Hi, On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Thankfully, Hamakor has a couple of representatives at the committee, > and one of them (yours truly) did his best to make the process as > transparent as possible. The best way to get your feedback considered by > the committee (before reaching the public comments stage, that is) is by > reading all the comments on the blog post Tzafrir pointed to, and then, > if what you said is not redundant to what was already said, leave a > comment with it. I think it is the only sane way to make sure your > comments actually get considered by the standard while it is being > drafted. Well, you asked for comments. I tried it. I liked it. But I really missed a certain key. This is my comment. This is the format of comments I best understand. If that key won't be included at all, I figure I won't go manually editing every system around. If this key ends up elsewhere, I'll probably just get used to it (it is already not exactly where it is in the lyx mapping I used before). I do want a single useful standard. However I'm all for trying it out (which I already do). So I have no intention in forking anything. This is just my way of trying it out. Please do keep up your good work there. Cheers, -- Tzafrir Cohen | tzaf...@jabber.org | VIM is http://tzafrir.org.il | | a Mutt's tzaf...@cohens.org.il | | best tzaf...@debian.org | | friend _______________________________________________ Linux-il mailing list Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il http://mailman.cs.huji.ac.il/mailman/listinfo/linux-il
