(even windows to windows) is
ALWAYS have a password.
When you share between a pi and Gnu/Linux machines , sometimes it is easier to
just use sshfs and nfs to share data than using SMB.
On Sunday, 3 January 2021 14:14:18 IST Shlomo Solomon wrote:
> After mounting with either of the above,
I have a samba share on a Raspberry PI
I can map it to a Windows 10 computer (and the PI does not ask for a
password - as intended since this is a home network for the family).
If I mount it on my Kubuntu machines, I DO need a password when
mounting manually with:
sudo mount //pi/PI-PUBLIC
I am not sure if that was the only problem but it seems the card
reader was partially broken.
Plugging the memory unit into another machine that has a built-in
reader made wonders.
That machine also runs Windows 7 but I don't think that was the point :)
Gabor
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Ome
1. Do you have a memory card inside the reader (before or after
connecting the reader to the PC)?
2. Did you expect the memory card to be automounted?
3. Does manual mount work?
4. Do the various udev scripts work properly to create the
appropriate /dev special file?
--- Omer
On Thu, 2011-06-16
Running Ubuntu 10.10 I connected a Zeikos memory card reader via usb 2.0
in /var/log/messages I get the following but the disk is not mounted.
Jun 16 21:55:08 localhost kernel: [475372.063775] usb 2-1: new high
speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 20
Jun 16 21:55:08 localhost kernel: [4753
On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:31:32 Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have an external USB hard-disk ( Maxtor 500 GB). Up to a few weeks ago, I
> was able to mount it and access it properly on my Mandriva Cooker system.
> Recently, however I got this error:
>
> {{{
> shlomi:~$ echo "Before c
After all these results, maybe it's worth to try usb storage device as
built in instead of module.
On 7/26/09, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I should note that after rebooting to my Debian partition, the
> external hard-disk is successfully mounted and I can see the
> partition. So it's likely
Hi all!
I should note that after rebooting to my Debian partition, the
external hard-disk is successfully mounted and I can see the
partition. So it's likely a problem with the Mandriva kernel or
something like that. I'll investigate.
Regards,
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote
On Saturday 25 July 2009 16:29:29 sara fink wrote:
> I also see that you have a new kernel that you installed lately. Did
> you check usb support in the kernel? Module or built in? lsmod will
> show you which modules you have autoloaded.
>
> grep -i usb /usr/src/linux/.config will show you what's g
On Saturday 25 July 2009 16:22:53 sara fink wrote:
> Hi Shlomi
>
> Your /etc/fstab suggests that the usb hd isn't mounted automatically
> upon boot. So when you mount as root sometimes you can specify ext3 as
> filesystem and sometimes you don't need. I had this case once. This
> was solved.
>
> a
Hi Shlomi
Your /etc/fstab suggests that the usb hd isn't mounted automatically
upon boot. So when you mount as root sometimes you can specify ext3 as
filesystem and sometimes you don't need. I had this case once. This
was solved.
as root mount /dev/sdd1 /mnt/external or mount -t ext3 /dev/sdd1 /
Hi all!
I have an external USB hard-disk ( Maxtor 500 GB). Up to a few weeks ago, I
was able to mount it and access it properly on my Mandriva Cooker system.
Recently, however I got this error:
{{{
shlomi:~$ echo "Before connecting the external disk"
Before connecting the external disk
n. Can it be mounted as a
> file and read? Under Linux, I would try mounting it as a loopback
> device, but will even that work?
>
> I know that some file systems store data as sector addresses and DD
> images can only be put back on a disk of the same geometry and in the
> same pla
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:52:57PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> I saw this question on another mailing list, not related to Linux.
>
> Someone has a DD dump of a ReiserFS partition. Can it be mounted as a
> file and read? Under Linux, I would try mounting it as a loopback
&
I saw this question on another mailing list, not related to Linux.
Someone has a DD dump of a ReiserFS partition. Can it be mounted as a
file and read? Under Linux, I would try mounting it as a loopback
device, but will even that work?
I know that some file systems store data as sector addresses
Kfir Lavi wrote:
Hi,
My hard disk failed and I had to ddrescue it to an image file.
What I did is copy the whole HD to image file.
So now I have hda.img
The problem is that now I want to work on the separate partitions in the
image, which I don't know how to do.
'fdisk -l hda.img' will not work
Hi,
My hard disk failed and I had to ddrescue it to an image file.
What I did is copy the whole HD to image file.
So now I have hda.img
The problem is that now I want to work on the separate partitions in the
image, which I don't know how to do.
'fdisk -l hda.img' will not work.
How do I proceed fr
On Tuesday, 10 בOctober 2006 01:07, guy keren wrote:
> NFS soft-mounting means data could be lost.
I beg to differ. Both type of mount may loose data on
different scenarios:
* With hard mount -- the client machine retries forever and never
return an error to the application. If the server
NFS soft-mounting means data could be lost. you never use this option on
a production host that serves important data. instead, you make sure the
server it mounted the file-system from, is more reliable then the server
mounting the NFS share.
this is because, a soft-mount may lose data in case
Dan Shimshoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hello, In a thread from linux-il from about half a year a go , there was a
discussion about nfs mounting to a machine (on which is afterewards there is a
shut down). see:
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il/msg43493
Hello, In a thread from linux-il from about half a year a go , there was a discussion about nfs mounting to a machine (on which is afterewards there is a shut down). see:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il/msg43493.htmlOne of the suggestions there was to use umount -f , and one
Oops...
I rechecked:
on that x86_64 :
instead
/mkufs -O=1 /test/disk-imag
it should have been
/mkufs -O 1 /test/disk-imag
and now mkufs and mount works ok on that x86_64 machine.
Regards,
Rami Rosen
On 9/27/06, Rami Rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Well following this I had launched a t
Hi,
Well following this I had launched a trial on x86_64
running fedora core 4 kernel.
THere were problems with the mkufs :
/mkufs -O=1 /test/disk-imag
gives:
=2: bad file system format value
and also
/mkufs -O=2 /test/disk-imag
gives:
=2: bad file system format value
So maybe there is a pr
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:02:44PM +0300, Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi Muli,
>
> >I doubt it (did you try it?).
>
> Now I tried it, on Fedora Core 4 (on x86).
>
> It works like a charm! feel free to try it ...
I did, on Suse 9 SP2 (x86-64) with a 2.6.18 kernel with both -O1 and
-O2 and neither worked
Hi Muli,
I doubt it (did you try it?).
Now I tried it, on Fedora Core 4 (on x86).
It works like a charm! feel free to try it ...
Aftrer applying the patch and "modprbe ufs" I ran that series of commands,
but mkfus like this :
/mkufs -O 1 /test/disk-image
Rhere was no error in mount , and
run
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:47:28PM +0300, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> Did anyone had success with this ?
Ok, I took a quick look at it. It appears that mkufs and fs/ufs/ do
not agree about the superblock location and/or the magic number:
UFSD (/home/muli/w/iommu/calgary/linux/fs/ufs/super.c, 612):
u
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:32:08PM +0300, Rami Rosen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try ./mkufs -O 1 /test/disk-image instead of
> /mkufs /test/disk-image
>
> there are 2
> file system formats for mkufs : 1 => UFS1, 2 => UFS2
>
> see also : mkufs -help.
>
> This should work.
I doubt it (did you try it?).
y ? Did anyone succeeded with creating and mounting ufs
on a loopback device on linux ?
Dan
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:56:10PM +0300, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> mount -o loop -t ufs /test/disk-image /loopDir
>
> I get:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop1,
> or too many mounted file systems
> (could this be the IDE device where you in fact use
>
Yedidyah,> Doesn't the kernel ('dmesg | tail') say anything?Yes , it does.running: mount -r -o loop,ufstype=old -t ufs /test/disk-image /loopDir
the kernel logs emits: ufs_read_super: bad magic numberperhaps is this mkufs problem (or because of running it in conjunction with loop device, which is l
Helllo,from man mount : Mount options for ufs ufstype=value...old Old format of ufs, this is the default, read only. (Don't forget to give the -r option.)
the other options (like 44bsd,sun,sunx86 ) seems unrelevant since this ufs was created on linux.Anyhow I
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:12:55PM +0300, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> perhaps is this mkufs problem (or because
> of running it in conjunction with loop device, which is less
> likely).
It's not the loop device, I get the same thing with a raw partition.
Cheers,
Muli
ne succeeded with creating and mounting ufs on a loopback device on linux ? Dan
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 03:47:28PM +0300, Dan Shimshoni wrote:
> Helllo,
>
> from man mount :
>
> Mount options for ufs
> ufstype=value
> ..
> oldOld format of ufs, this is the default, read only.
> (Don't forget to give the -r option.)
>
> ...
> the other opt
Hi Greg,
I came across your email from google when I was
seeing if I could mount a Solaris UFS volume on a Linux machine in READ only
mode for backup.
1. We are using StoreAge virtualization, and a
FastT 600. Customer has three SUN solaris machines.
2. We are using StoreAge virtualizati
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Mon, 12 Sep:
> I know of two solutions. One is called "GFS". It's originally by RedHat.
> It's GPL. I'm not aware of a Solaris version for it, however.
>
> The second is a proprietary solution called "CXFS". It's based on SGI's
> XFS (now GPL), but the SAN
Greg Pendler wrote:
> How can i correct this (if that's possible). Your suggestions are
> welcome.
What you need here is a filesystem that was built to be simultaneously
accessed over a SAN. If the only thing you did was connect the same
"disk" to two machines, then this is not it. All such files
Hi all,
I manage a SAN system composed of:
1) Disk array (IBM FastT200)
2) Fiber channel switch
3) Several servers (Linux/Solaris/Win2X/Novel)
4) Storage virtualizator, that manages it (out-of-band so i can hardly
believe i can blame it for my problems).
I need same files to be accessibl
On 8/23/05, Itay Duvdevani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
> without specifying its limits (size) ? What if I have another
> partition at the end of the one I need - isn't there a chance it will
> be overwrit
On 8/23/05, Itay Duvdevani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
> without specifying its limits (size) ? What if I have another
> partition at the end of the one I need - isn't there a chance it will
> be overwritten?
Not if the filesystem
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Monday 22 August 2005 22:58, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > In other words, "mount the whole file as a disk rather than a
> > partition". I'm not familiar with a comfortable way of doing it.
>
> Interesting scenario. If the file contains a disk image (with
>
On Monday 22 August 2005 22:58, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> In other words, "mount the whole file as a disk rather than a
> partition". I'm not familiar with a comfortable way of doing it.
Interesting scenario. If the file contains a disk image (with
partition table etc.) than what is actually needed
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 10:29:42PM +0300, Itay Duvdevani wrote:
> When specifying an offset for the partition, can it be used safely
> without specifying its limits (size)?
Interesting question. I believe so - at least for the file systems
I've used this with, the file system always knows where i
nd).
> > 3. dd-ing that partition off the image to a separate file.
> > 4. mounting that file directly, taking away my file.
> >
> > Mission successful - although I'd like to ask if there's a better
> way.
>
> mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/wha
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 8/22/05, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the filesystem im
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:01:37AM +0300, Peter wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the f
On 8/22/05, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> > mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
>
> What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
> indicate the offset of the filesystem image in the file ? If so, what
>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:01:37AM +0300, Peter wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> >mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
>
> What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
> indicate the offset of the filesystem image in the file ?
Ye
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
mount -o loop,offset=xxx myfile /dev/whatever
What does the offset=xxx do ? It does not exist on my version. Does it
indicate the offset of the filesystem image in the file ? If so, what
version of mount etc is this ?
thanks,
Peter
===
fsets in the image of my desired
> partition (start + end).
> 3. dd-ing that partition off the image to a separate file.
> 4. mounting that file directly, taking away my file.
>
> Mission successful - although I'd like to ask if there's a better
way.
mount -o loop,offset=xxx
+ end).
3. dd-ing that partition off the image to a separate file.
4. mounting that file directly, taking away my file.
Mission successful - although I'd like to ask if there's a better way.
Problems with this method are:
1. You can losetup a file with an offset, but I couldn't fin
Hi list.
I have a web server where /tmp is mounted on a disk image /tmp/tmpdisk. I
mainly do this so I can mount /tmp as nodev,noexec and to limit its size -
I've been hit a couple of times by crackers who managed to get a web site to
store an executable on /tmp and run it.
Anyway - I have th
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Kfir Lavi wrote:
> Hi,
> i have linux and windows xp box.
> The linux is Debian Sarge.
>
> I have some mount points on the xp shared to the local network.
> After i restart linux, i can mount the shared on the xp.
> If i boot the xp, then i cann't mount an
Hi,
i have linux and windows xp box.
The linux is Debian Sarge.
I have some mount points on the xp shared to the local network.
After i restart linux, i can mount the shared on the xp.
If i boot the xp, then i cann't mount and i get:
6931: protocol negotiation failed
SMB connection failed
Now if
Amir Spivak wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Red Had 7.0
system, when trying to mount a partition onto a mounting pointing point
i've created for it, it just hangs forever, i tried mounting it as both
ext2 and ext3.
when running fsck on the
partition everything seems to be fine.
Hi all,
I have a Red Had 7.0 system, when trying to
mount a partition onto a mounting pointing point i've created for it, it just
hangs forever, i tried mounting it as both ext2 and ext3.
when running fsck on the partition
everything seems to be fine. what might have gone wrong here?
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marc's List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: nfs mounting query
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "
defrent kernel if you want .
Thanks
Erez Kirson
- Original Message -
From: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erez Kirson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marc's List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Nove
have the SRPM for the version of the util-linux package RH
shipped with that system, I'd like to see it. That's where the
userspace NFS mounting code lives.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
"the nucleus of linux oscill
To: "Erez Kirson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marc's List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: nfs mounting query
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:41:51AM +0200, Erez Kirson wrote:
>
> > From my knowledge it does fal
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:41:51AM +0200, Erez Kirson wrote:
> From my knowledge it does fall back to UDP,
> I have tried this with NETAPP filers where you can just turn off "nfs tcp
> support",
> The linux client tries to mount tcp and then falls back to udp.
> I have even tried to ues the -o pro
nnections are disabled )
Hope it helped
Erez
- Original Message -
From: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marc's List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: nfs mounting query
==
Howdy,
Assume the following situations:
- A Linux NFS client
- An NFS server, listening on either UDP or TCP (the client doesn't
know which).
The client will try contacting the server on TCP first. Assuming it
fails, will it fallback to UDP? looking at the code in the kernel,
nope. Looking at
Two unrelated CDROM issues - the first should interest KDE users and the
second should interest MDK9.0 users.
1 - I came across a really nice program to make it easy to mount an ISO image
as a virtual CDROM in KDE. After installing the program, right clicking on an
ISO shows a new menu item - *
I'm experiencing problems on mounting an exported / directory (I know
it's not safe practice - no choice and in secure intranet).
I can export the "/" but when I try to mount it I get a permission
denied error.
I've looked for configuration flags both on the export and
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 18:45:19 +0200, Lior Kesos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm experiencing problems on mounting an exported / directory (I know
> it's not safe practice - no choice and in secure intranet).
> I can export the "/" but when I try to mount
I'm experiencing problems on mounting an exported / directory (I know
it's not safe practice - no choice and in secure intranet).
I can export the "/" but when I try to mount it I get a permission
denied error.
I've looked for configuration flags both on the export and
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:18:44AM +0200, Alon Barzilai wrote:
> any adea ?
Something was very weird in the script.
I've fixed it now and an updated version is online. In fact, this new
version works better than the original, since it handles both relative
and absolute paths correctly, e.g.:
un
thanks,
works great.
Alon.
Ehud Karni wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 00:13:39 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>
>>1. Mount the ISOs into different directories.
>>2. Use my "union" utility to consolidate the different directories into one
>>single directory. It creates dire
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 00:13:39 +0200, Ilya Konstantinov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> 1. Mount the ISOs into different directories.
> 2. Use my "union" utility to consolidate the different directories into one
> single directory. It creates directories and symbolic links as necessary, so
> that the
.95-mark/example/mount.c Thu Jan 10 16:09:02 2002
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+/*
+ FUSE: Filesystem in Userspace
+ Copyright (C) 2001 Miklos Szeredi ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
+
+ This program can be distributed under the terms of the GNU GPL.
+ See the file COPYING.
+
+ This example shows mounting of single directory (whate
thnaks, that what I was looking for.
I tried it, and it does not produce anything.
I do not know much perl.
I used the debugger and saw that in the lines
foreach my $name (grep(!/^(\.|\.\.)$/, readdir(DIRHANDLE)))
and
while (($key,$value) = each %symlinks)
the script never continue inside the
On Monday 07 October 2002 16:01, Alon Barzilai wrote:
> mount -t iso9660 -o ro 1.iso /mnt/disk1
> mount -t iso9660 -o ro 2.iso /mnt/disk1
This is called "union mount". Linux does not have this feature (I think BSD
has it).
> I remember a few months ago someone metioned something similar here, b
Quoth Alon Barzilai:
> how can mount few iso images to the same mount point ?
You cannot mount two anyhthing on the same mount point. Or, rather, you
can but the second mount is, in fact, an overmount - hiding the
previous device's files.
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to M
hi,
how can mount few iso images to the same mount point ?
I tried
mount -t iso9660 -o ro 1.iso /mnt/disk1
mount -t iso9660 -o ro 2.iso /mnt/disk1
and I can see only the 2nd image files.
I remember a few months ago someone metioned something similar here, but
I could not find this message.
A
he more I'm convinced this approach should work.
HTH
-Cedar
PS. Let us all know what works in the end.. :)
> --
>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 22:22:14 +0300
> From: Yedidyah Bar-David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: mounting iso9660 as rw
On Tue, May 28, 2002, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about "Re: mounting iso9660 as rw":
> I am not in the business of duplicating NT CDs, or any copyrighted CD for that
> matter.
> However, I wonder what is it that you are saying - is it impossible to extract
> the 1.44Mb bootab
> >
> > I think I could copy all the files from the iso, and my own, and rebuild the
> > whole bunch, but I just don't like the idea.
>
> But this seems to me to be the only clean way.
> Of course, it might won't work for you at all (e.g. if the image is of
> a bootable CD which you can't create
Hi,
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:46:46AM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> This may sound odd at first, and useless later, but I would like to add some
> files to a iso9660 filesystem.
>
> To be more exact, I have an iso of a CD and would like to update it with my own
> stuff. I tried to loop-mount i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tzahi Fadida
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:30 PM
> To: Dan Kenigsberg
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: mounting iso9660 as rw
>
>
> here are some leads, maybe
s.Com
* - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - *
WARNING TO SPAMMERS: see at http://members.lycos.co.uk/my2nis/spamwarning.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Kenigsberg
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 10:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mounting iso9660
On Mon, May 27, 2002, Dan Kenigsberg wrote about "mounting iso9660 as rw":
> This may sound odd at first, and useless later, but I would like to add some
> files to a iso9660 filesystem.
>..
> I think I could copy all the files from the iso, and my own, and rebuild the
>
This may sound odd at first, and useless later, but I would like to add some
files to a iso9660 filesystem.
To be more exact, I have an iso of a CD and would like to update it with my own
stuff. I tried to loop-mount it with rw option and even have
/c/redhat/valhalla-i386-disc3.iso on /rh73/d3 t
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 December 2001 19:22 pm, Refael Ackermann wrote:
> I have two windows 2000 dynamic disks on my computer (and a third drive
> formated ext3)
> On each disk there is an simple volume and one striped-volume on both
> disks.
I see.
> Is there any why to mount this volumes on RH 7.2
I have two windows 2000 dynamic disks on my computer (and a third drive
formated ext3)
On each disk there is an simple volume and one striped-volume on both disks.
Is there any why to mount this volumes on RH 7.2 (2.4.9-13 kernel)?
OT: do you know of a program to resize W2K dynamic volumes or r
Hi,
I've just freed some 6GB on IGLU by loopback-mounting RedHat 7.1 to the
ISOs. Mind the directory contents might not match exactly the one on
ftp.redhat.com (e.g. various index files here and there) but all the
RPMs, SRPMs and docs are there mounted, so you could download single
RPM
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 08:31:34PM +0200, Adi Schwartz wrote:
> as you probably know you cant mount larger then 2G
> Fat Partitions on Linux
Good old FAT partitions couldn't be >2GB by definition.
FAT32 extended it (allowing >2GB paritions since Windows 95 OSR2 /
Windows 98). FAT32 is supported
Hi
I am using slackware 7. on a 9GB scsi. 1 partation is 250MB that is /boot
but the rest is all in a single partation... almost 8 & 1/2 GB!!! & its
working fine
regards.
rajesh
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Adi Schwartz wrote:
> hii all subscribers.
>
> as you probably know you cant mount la
hii all subscribers.
as you probably know you cant mount larger then 2G
Fat Partitions on Linux
im running RH 6.2 and i was wondering if there is a
solution for that by now.
adi.
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 06:08:21PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> OUCH. I'd love to know if you can connect to surfree from linux with
> windows running in a VMWare window :-)
If MS-Windows was the kind of operating system that includes
out-of-the-box IP forwarding just so that its users are happy,
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:58:32PM +, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> The man has decided to use SurFree (the free payment ISP) - and in order to
> connect - you must use THEIR dialer program and NOT something else. Their
> program will give you after connecting - a window with advertisement and
> y
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 09:58:22PM +, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> You should look for a program called: explore2fs or something like that (I
> don't remember the name exactly), which lets you read/write to ext2fs..
When I last tried it, it was buggy enough to make it almost impossible
to use (rea
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Boltyansky Boris wrote:
> My ISP doesn't support internet connection using linux so I have to
> download Linux software in Windows.
you're the sysadmin at your company, demand your boss to pay your
internet bills and get a standard PPP account.
> Recently I've downloaded 6 M
moria"
>Sent: Thu March 09 2000 15:14
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:Mounting floppy.
>
>
>Hi!
>
>My ISP doesn't support internet connection using linux so I have to
>download Linux software in Windows.
>
>
>
AX: +972-3-5364060
http://www.breakt.co.il | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Boltyansky Boris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] "Boria viydi is moria"
Sent: Thu March 09 2000 15:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Mounting floppy.
Hi!
My ISP doesn'
Boltyansky Boris wrote:
>
>
> [b@localhost /dev]$ mount /dev/fd1 /diskette001
>
> I've got a message that told me to specify the file system, how will I
> do that? (how should the command line look like?)
mount /dev/fd1 /diskette001 -t msdos
or use the mtools package: mcopy a:/* /diskette001
Hi there!
Chen Shapira wrote:
>
> > Recently I've downloaded 6 MB and I wanted to copy them to my Linux
> > partition.
> > I don't have VMware, and I don't have a CD-Writer so I have to use
> > floppy (3.5").
> > I've zipped those 6 MB into 5 floppys, and then restarted the computer
> > and boot
You should look for a program called: explore2fs or something like that (I
don't remember the name exactly), which lets you read/write to ext2fs..
Hetz
At 15:13 09/03/2000 +0200, Boltyansky Boris wrote:
>Hi!
>
>My ISP doesn't support internet connection using linux so I have to
>download Linux
Hi!
My ISP doesn't support internet connection using linux so I have to
download Linux software in Windows.
Recently I've downloaded 6 MB and I wanted to copy them to my Linux
partition.
I don't have VMware, and I don't have a CD-Writer so I have to use
floppy (3.5").
I've zipped those 6 MB into
99 matches
Mail list logo
