o direction control semantics.
Doron
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: charset
iso-8859-8-i":
Both the last sentences are not exactly accurate.
Care to back up this claim with a reference?
I don't nee
IL PROTECTED]>
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
charset iso-8859-8-i
Hi,
My question refers to an old message of yours (about one year ago) in
which ou mention this character set:
What is the difference between this set and the iso-8859-8 ?
On my system (debian/testing, kernel 2.4.?? ) ican find on
TED]
Sent by: mavram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
21/08/2004 12:23
To
"Nadav Har'El" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
charset iso-8859-8-i
Hi,
My question refers to an old message of yours (about one year ago) in
which ou mention this character set:
What is t
Nadav Har'El wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: charset iso-8859-8-i":
Both the last sentences are not exactly accurate.
Care to back up this claim with a reference?
I don't need to. You agree with it yourself. Let me try to rephrase in
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004, Shachar Shemesh wrote about "Re: charset iso-8859-8-i":
> Both the last sentences are not exactly accurate.
Care to back up this claim with a reference?
> When logical Hebrew became popular, people wanted to use ISO-8859-8 for
> logical Hebrew pages. T
Nadav Har'El wrote:
iso-8859-8 (without -i), the "visual order", is the old encoding used in
legacy applications that had no bidi support. There's no reason to use it
nowadays, and especially not in long plain texts (documents, emails, etc.).
It is unfortunate that the standard bodies chose to make
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about "charset iso-8859-8-i":
> My question refers to an old message of yours (about one year ago) in
> which ou mention this character set:
> What is the difference between this set and the iso-8859-8 ?
> On my system (debi
Hi,
My question refers to an old message of yours (about one year ago) in
which ou mention this character set:
What is the difference between this set and the iso-8859-8 ?
On my system (debian/testing, kernel 2.4.?? ) ican find only the latter.
If there are differences, please indicate where can I
