Re: bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-16 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
! Already added to the Bugzilla. I'm not near my machine right now, so I can't check this. Anyway: generally bugs with the bidi mozilla should be reported to the netscape.public.mozilla.i18n group (I CC this message to their mailing list) -- Tzafri

Re: bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-16 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
Hi Tzafrir, On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 12:07:43PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > You can find it at: > ftp://linux.org.il/pub/Hebrew/Netscape/mozilla-bidi-20010109-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz First of all, thanks. Been working with your compiled version all day and it seems to be very good. One bug I

Re: bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-16 Thread yossia
I wish to thank all who have made it possible, to have that Hebrew support in Mozilla. For a long time now I've been hearing that there is bidi ... - This time it actually works - Thanks to you and others who had put the effort. Now I can stick to Linux 99.9% of the time (At home at least), no

Re: bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
uch time configuring this. > > btw when gtk will be bidi too, won't it make problems ? (mozilla uses gtk, > so maybe it'll reverse the reveresed-already text ? It works now on hebrew windows, which is even a bigger problem, because hebrew windows (at least win9x, IIRC from the t

Re: bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-15 Thread Ely Levy
I got a weird error after compiling mozilla I try to run it and it just doesn't open the window or try to access the display the DISPLAY var is set it doesn't seg fault no errors anyone got something like that and know how to fix it? Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel

bidi-mozilla 20010109

2001-01-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi I built the latest sources from ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/warpzilla/bidi-source-01-09-2001.zip You can find it at: ftp://linux.org.il/pub/Hebrew/Netscape/mozilla-bidi-20010109-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz As always: * not much tested * built on mandrake 7.2 (gcc 2.95-2, XFree4, etc

Re: bidi mozilla again

2001-01-04 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
TC>> BTW: the source was full of files with CR chars, which annoyed cpp on many TC>> occasions, and thus had to be removed. TC>> TC>> crlf from fixDos ( http://e.co.za/marius/downloads/misc/ ) proved to be TC>> very handy for the job. Actually, I guess perl -npi.bak -e 's/\r\n$/\n/g' would do the

Re: bidi mozilla again

2001-01-03 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Hi all > > A later visit to the ftp directory in which the win32 build of bidi > mozilla resides, shows a file called bidisrc: > > ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/warpzilla/bidisrc-12-11.zip > from: > ftp://ftp.soft

Re: bidi mozilla again

2000-12-17 Thread Ely Levy
there is a BIDI cvs tree for mozilla which is preety advanced and not broken take a look at it Ely Levy System group Hebrew University Jerusalem Israel On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: | On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:13:10PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: | > Anybody wants to try to

Re: bidi mozilla again

2000-12-15 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, "Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm ready to vote for it twice a day :) That's realy _only_ thing why I > can't say "Mozilla is an usable browser". I don't need and probably won't > need MathML in coming 10 years, On the other hand, I need MathM

Re: bidi mozilla again

2000-12-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
this code, the least we should do is help maintaining it: supply builds (as building mozilla isn't that easy) and report bugs. (Actually, a year ago it was on the top of my priorities list. But now that there is a browser for linux that supports logical hebrew, bidi mozilla is slowly losing pri

Re: bidi mozilla again

2000-12-15 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
IK>> there in the US. I wonder if we should start a major Bugzilla issue IK>> and make everyone vote for it, or maybe just flood Bugzilla with IK>> bugs such as "msn.co.il displays reversed" ? I'm ready to vote for it twice a day :) That's realy _only_ thing why I can't say "Mozilla is an usable

Re: bidi mozilla again

2000-12-15 Thread Ilya Konstantinov
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:13:10PM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Anybody wants to try to build this and (hopefully) give us a build of > mozilla with logical hebrew support for linux? The other day I asked Mike Kaply (mkaply on irc.mozila.org #mozilla) from IBM to pack those sources. After 39MB o

bidi mozilla again

2000-12-14 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi all A later visit to the ftp directory in which the win32 build of bidi mozilla resides, shows a file called bidisrc: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/warpzilla/bidisrc-12-11.zip from: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/warpzilla/ Anybody wants to try to build this and (hopefully

bidi-mozilla updae

2000-11-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi nothing much to update on, except that there is a build for win32 with what's supposed to be a more stable code: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/ps/products/warpzilla/bidi-win32-rel-11-13.zip There is currently a bidimozilla branch in the mozilla cvs, but it contains some older code. Unfortunetel

bidi mozilla

2000-10-22 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi This is somewhat off-topic. I'm currently a bit lazy (and lacking some disk space) to check this: Recently the bidi code for mozilla was added to a seperate branch in the mozilla CVS. Any ideas if and when is it going to be merged into the main branch? I heard something about M18, but I figu