Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Have anyone noticed, in their hot pursuit of ADSL, how Bezeq in an
> obvious ingenious fashion,
> chose to make the entire 10.0.0.0/8 A class unusable for mere mortals?
There is no need to surrender the whole 10.x.x.x network to the ADSL
modem. I have just verified that
Hi, Schlomo!
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 02:52:43PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> Well, but the lo network (127.0.0.1) is usually defined with a netmask of
> 127.255.255.255 which would break your suggestion.
You probably meant netmask 255.0.0.0. But you misread his suggestion.
172.16.0.0/12 is
: "Gilad Ben-Yossef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Stupid Bezeq
>
>
> > Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for private
> > networks, even
- Original Message -
From: "Schlomo Schapiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gilad Ben-Yossef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Stupid Bezeq
> Well, now you know why it is better to pick
Shlomo,
It is a routing problem. If you have a few network interfaces on the
router (either eth , ppp, vpn or whatever), and one has the 10.0.0.0/8
assigned to it, none of the other can use ip numbers in that range, or
route to other 10 net numbers.
Dani
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Schlomo Schapiro wrot
Actually I didn't really get where the problem is. After all the private
network ends at the NAT gateway and about anything outside you just don't
care.
If you connect to places that run a private net via some tunnel over the
public IP net, then again you don't care wether part of this public IP
SS>> Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for
SS>> private networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
Guess which address space will the second provider take? Bingo!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ There shall be counsels taken
Stanislav Malyshev /\ Stronger than
Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for private
networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
Schlomo
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
>
>
> Have anyone noticed, in their hot pursuit of ADSL, how Bezeq in an
> obvious ingenious fashion,
> chose to make
Gilad,
I have pointed that in the HOWTO. Anyway, I believe you can log in to the
ADSL , change the netmask to class C , move the host to 10.0.0.x and use
the rest of the 10 net to whatever you find useful.
Dani
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
>
>
> Have anyone noticed, in their
Have anyone noticed, in their hot pursuit of ADSL, how Bezeq in an
obvious ingenious fashion,
chose to make the entire 10.0.0.0/8 A class unusable for mere mortals?
You see if you're running a private LAN, and there is any chance in the
world someone would
want to connect to it from the outs
10 matches
Mail list logo
