Shlomo,
It is a routing problem. If you have a few network interfaces on the
router (either eth , ppp, vpn or whatever), and one has the 10.0.0.0/8
assigned to it, none of the other can use ip numbers in that range, or
route to other 10 net numbers.
Dani
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> Actually I didn't really get where the problem is. After all the private
> network ends at the NAT gateway and about anything outside you just don't
> care.
>
> If you connect to places that run a private net via some tunnel over the
> public IP net, then again you don't care wether part of this public IP
> runs over some fake nets or not since only your two gateways have to (and
> can) know about YOUR private nets.
>
> So, where could the private provider net possible be a problem ?
>
> Schlomo
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo wrote:
>
> > SS>> Well, now you know why it is better to pick 192.168.*.* for
> > SS>> private networks, even if you get to type more numbers :-)
> >
> > Guess which address space will the second provider take? Bingo!
> >
> >
>
> --
> Schlomo Schapiro
> Computation Authority
> Hebrew University of Jerusalem
>
> Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404
> Fax: 65-27349
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro
>
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]