On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Ohad Levy wrote:
> what about git?
>
Well, my take on the problems with git are that:
1. Its Windows-support may be lacking. See:
http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/33825
2. It is more complex than Subversion:
<<
shlomi:~$ git-
Display all 132 possibilities
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> Ohad Levy wrote:
> > what about git?
>
> Git main attraction is distributed development. For something like the
> Linux kernel it is indispensable.
>
> The thing is, most software development, even in the Open Source world,
> is not really dist
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:57:32 +0200
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc Volovic wrote:
>
> > Good heavens...
> >
> > Subversion and/or CVS - take your choice.
> >
> I'll go with that recommendation if you only give me one thing that CVS
> does better than SVN.
>
> Between the tw
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:21:56 +0200
Gilad Ben-Yossef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ohad Levy wrote:
> > what about git?
> >
>
> Git main attraction is distributed development. For something like the
> Linux kernel it is indispensable.
>
> The thing is, most software development, even in the Open
svn (subversion) is relatively easy to use and has both gui and cli frontends
(windows maybe only gui). there is tortoise svn which integrates into explorer.
cvs is mostly the same.
The big difference is that with cvs commits are per file (if you made dependent
changes on two different files the
On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Shahar Dag wrote:
> Hi
>
> the advantage of SVN over CVS is:
> 1. if you commit several files, in SVN it is an atomic action while in CVS
> it is not. Than mean that with CVS some file may be updated while other
> wont ==> your repository is not consistent
From what I
Ohad Levy wrote:
what about git?
Git main attraction is distributed development. For something like the
Linux kernel it is indispensable.
The thing is, most software development, even in the Open Source world,
is not really distributed. Also, I don't think there is a Windows git
client :-
Oi,
Git is a silly that.
M
- "Ohad Levy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about git?
>
--
---MAV
Marc A. Volovic Swiftouch, LTD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-544-676764
===
what about git?
On Feb 19, 2008 8:16 PM, Shahar Dag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> the advantage of SVN over CVS is:
> 1. if you commit several files, in SVN it is an atomic action while in CVS
> it is not. Than mean that with CVS some file may be updated while other
> wont
> ==> your
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 02:16:39PM +0200, Shahar Dag wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> the advantage of SVN over CVS is:
> 1. if you commit several files, in SVN it is an atomic action while in CVS
> it is not. Than mean that with CVS some file may be updated while other
> wont ==> your repository is not
Hi
the advantage of SVN over CVS is:
1. if you commit several files, in SVN it is an atomic action while in CVS
it is not. Than mean that with CVS some file may be updated while other wont
==> your repository is not consistent
2. when renaming, CVS will loose the history while SVN whill han
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I'll go with that recommendation if you only give me one thing that CVS does
better than SVN.
Between the two, I fail to find a single reason to prefer the former over the
later.
Well, given that subversion was written to be an improved replacement for
CVS, it's unli
Marc Volovic wrote:
Good heavens...
Subversion and/or CVS - take your choice.
I'll go with that recommendation if you only give me one thing that CVS
does better than SVN.
Between the two, I fail to find a single reason to prefer the former
over the later.
Shachar
On Monday 18 February 2008, Maxim Kudelya wrote:
> David Suna wrote:
> > I am interested in setting up a simple source code control system for a
> > SOHO setup.
>
> ..
>
> >Any suggestions?
>
> You could use Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) as version
> control system,
> Trac (http://trac
Good heavens...
Subversion and/or CVS - take your choice.
I am not sure what you mean by "graphic management", but both have graphic and
web CLIENTS.
Management is something completely different :-).
Me
=
To unsubscribe, send
CVS or SVN are pretty straight forward. Most IDEs have integration with
them.
Both have nice windows shell extensions (TortoiseSVN/CVS)
http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/
http://subversion.tigris.org/
Regards
Alex Dover
On Feb 18, 2008 3:50 PM, David Suna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in
David Suna wrote:
I am interested in setting up a simple source code control system for a
SOHO setup.
..
Any suggestions?
You could use Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) as version
control system,
Trac (http://trac.edgewall.org/) as web-based front end and TortoiseSVN
(http://tor
17 matches
Mail list logo
