On Tuesday 19 February 2008, Ohad Levy wrote: > what about git? > Well, my take on the problems with git are that:
1. Its Windows-support may be lacking. See: http://use.perl.org/~Alias/journal/33825 2. It is more complex than Subversion: <<<<<<<<<< shlomi:~$ git- Display all 132 possibilities? (y or n) >>>>>>>>>> 3. The command line syntax of operating it, should be less CVS-like and less intuitve than Subversion's. 4. Possibly have some gotchas that are not present in Subversion. Like no support for keywords: http://www.mail-archive.com/haifux%40haifux.org/msg02971.html -------------- git should be a fine version control system, but Subversion may be good enough or better for the usecase of the OP. Regards, Shlomi Fish > On Feb 19, 2008 8:16 PM, Shahar Dag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > the advantage of SVN over CVS is: > > 1. if you commit several files, in SVN it is an atomic action while in > > CVS it is not. Than mean that with CVS some file may be updated while > > other wont > > ==> your repository is not consistent > > 2. when renaming, CVS will loose the history while SVN whill handle it OK > > > > I think that the installasion of CVS is easier > > window client will depand on your development environment, for example > > you can get a plugin for Eclipse (one for CVS & one for SVN) > > I also worked with WinCVS/CvsNT as a client for windows > > > > Have fun > > Shahar > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > >____________________ I am looking for old Vinyl record. > > If you have any that you don't need please mail me > > > > Thanks > > Shahar > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Suna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il> > > Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:50 PM > > Subject: Source code control system > > > > >>I am interested in setting up a simple source code control system for a > > >>SOHO setup. There is a Linux server running Ubuntu that can act as the > > >>repository server. Clients would be Windows and Linux. I am looking > > > > for > > > > >>recommendations for a system that will be easy to set up and not have a > > >>steep learning curve (i.e. less than two hours to get the basic system > > > > up > > > > >>and running and configured). There will only be one or two people > > >> using the system to begin with and all access will be over the local > > >> network. Ideally, there would be a graphical or web based front end to > > >>administering the system and an easy to use client for both Windows and > > >>Linux. Any suggestions? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> David Suna > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > >> ================================================================= > > >> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > >> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > > >> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ================================================================= > > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.shlomifish.org/ I'm not an actor - I just play one on T.V. ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
