Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-30 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 03:59:52PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 06:46:50PM +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > > > > On May 29, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Ira Abramov wrote: > > How much is going to be broken? > > Any script that assumes that the Linux version number is > 2.6. . I'

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On May 29, 2011, at 11:24 PM, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: That's old news. That switch was over 5 years ago. Since then Linux (the kernel) has avoided that long development cycles. It may have been, but it took a long time to finally die. I will say I was dumbstruck when I finally upgraded my R

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, May 29, 2011, geoffrey mendelson wrote about "Re: Linux 3.0": > As for your using Linux for 18 years, that would put you starting in > 1993. That surprises me because I have been using Linux since mid 1995 > and in those days it was not much more than a curiosity, an

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread guy keren
why do you think you are not both right? each of you had different uses for Linux, different needs, and different experiences. the same can be said for other operating systems too. personally, i have been using Linux as my home desktop OS since October 1993. were there problems? yes, there were

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread guy keren
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 18:29 +0300, Ira Abramov wrote: > I see no one else mentioned it on the list, so here it is, fresh from > the kernel liׁ•t - Linus is considering a switch from 2.6.X to 3.X soon. > No technical reason I can see, only that the kernel is going to be > entering its third decade o

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
Hi, On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:16:49PM +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > > On May 29, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: >> >> I know you said this as a joke, but to rain on your parade, BSD is not >> GNU- >> free. As far as I know *BSD distributions typically use quite a number >> of GNU >>

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On May 29, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Nadav Har'El wrote: I know you said this as a joke, but to rain on your parade, BSD is not GNU- free. As far as I know *BSD distributions typically use quite a number of GNU packages, such as gcc, groff, bc, and probably a bunch of others. They also include,

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Sun, May 29, 2011, geoffrey mendelson wrote about "Re: Linux 3.0": > Good time to switch to BSD? It's GNU free :-) I know you said this as a joke, but to rain on your parade, BSD is not GNU- free. As far as I know *BSD distributions typically use quite a number of GNU pac

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 06:46:50PM +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote: > > On May 29, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Ira Abramov wrote: > >> I see no one else mentioned it on the list, so here it is, fresh from >> the kernel liׁ•t - Linus is considering a switch from 2.6.X to 3.X >> soon. >> No technical reason

Re: Linux 3.0

2011-05-29 Thread geoffrey mendelson
On May 29, 2011, at 6:29 PM, Ira Abramov wrote: I see no one else mentioned it on the list, so here it is, fresh from the kernel liׁ•t - Linus is considering a switch from 2.6.X to 3.X soon. No technical reason I can see, only that the kernel is going to be entering its third decade of life