On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:47:54AM +0200, Felix Shvaiger wrote:
> Hi All !
>
> May I develop proprietary application (executable) that uses LGPLed library
> in form of shared library and distribute nothing but:
> 1. executable file itself
> 2. my proprietary license for this executable
> 3. notic
Hi, Stanislav!
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:41:46PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> OZ>> While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
> OZ>> exactly for such a situation.
>
> More interesting question. Let's say we have some open source non-GPL
> application, which u
OZ>> While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
OZ>> exactly for such a situation.
More interesting question. Let's say we have some open source non-GPL
application, which uses LGPL-library.
1. Is such application legal?
2. Can LGPL library source be distibuted tog
While IANAL, my understanding of the situation is that LGPL was designed
exactly for such a situation.
The deciding point is whether your customer can customize your application
by modifying the LGPLed library and using his modified executable with
your application; and whether he can share his m
