On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Beni Cherniavsky wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote on 2003-11-03:
>
> > Now, for the choice of language:
> >
> > Perl - my favourite language (;-)). There's more than one way to do it.
> > Very flexible. A lot of different ways to accomplish the same thing. Some
> > people love it. S
Shlomi Fish wrote on 2003-11-03:
> Now, for the choice of language:
>
> Perl - my favourite language (;-)). There's more than one way to do it.
> Very flexible. A lot of different ways to accomplish the same thing. Some
> people love it. Some people hate it. You can't know until you've tried.
>
>
>> > Python,perl,tcl/tk,qt,gtk+
Are you looking for a language or a toolkit ?
You have FLTK, vxWindows and GLUI (over OpenGL).
This e-mail message has been sent by Elbit Systems Ltd.
and is for the use of the intended recipients only.
The message may contain privileged or confidenti
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 21:40, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:03, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego I
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:03, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Here is my opinion: any one of t
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 22:02, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2003 20:39, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > Although I believe that if you use dynamic linking you can still mix GPL
> > and closed source (as you are not actually including the source in you
> > program).
>
> The type of linking is
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 20:39, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Although I believe that if you use dynamic linking you can still mix GPL
> and closed source (as you are not actually including the source in you
> program).
The type of linking is irrelevant, the determining factor is if it's derived
work
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:03, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > > > downsides o
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > > > downsides of each ap
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:03:02AM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > >
Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:22:50 +0200 (IST)
From: Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GUI language for beginners
Hi!
Did you mean to send this E-mail to the list?
On Tue
> Well it's a bit weird,
> for once I remember it was fully GPLed few month ago
> now they seem to change it so although there is GPLed
> version of QT for windows only academic people can download it
> but since it's fully GPLed I don't see how they how they can stop
> anyone who isn't academic fr
> On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:07:05PM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>>
>> Was waiting for someone else to mention that, but no one did.
>> Perhaps PyGTK (Python + GTK bindings) is the best to go these
>> days. There are thousands of small and large examples out there
>> to copy from ;-). Ruby + GT
btw if you want to even get more confuzed
http://www.trolltech.com/download/index.html
notice the educational version is under the GPL section
if you look on the licence part of the page it would tell you
it's under educational license
so I guess their webpage is a bit not updated to one side
(eith
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
>> Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
>> downsides of each approach.
>>
>> gtk:
>> * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop
>> language)
>
> I beg your pardon? Gtk+ is Object-Oriented. And you
Well it's a bit weird,
for once I remember it was fully GPLed few month ago
now they seem to change it so although there is GPLed
version of QT for windows only academic people can download it
but since it's fully GPLed I don't see how they how they can stop
anyone who isn't academic from copying i
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> >
> > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > > downsides of each approach.
> > >
> > > gtk:
> > > * not object oriented (looks u
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
> > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > downsides of each approach.
> >
> > gtk:
> > * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
> > * looks fu
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> downsides of each approach.
>
> gtk:
> * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
> * looks funkey on win32
>
> qt:
> * not free in win32
Actually
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> downsides of each approach.
>
> gtk:
> * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
I beg your pardon? Gtk+ is Object-Oriented. And you can do OOP in
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi Aviad,
>
> I've decided that a lot of voices make for a more interesting
> conversation. I'm therefor forwarding your email to a mailing list I
> read (and occasionally even write to). I'm sure the good people here
> will have plenty to say. You may
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:07:05PM -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>
> Was waiting for someone else to mention that, but no one did.
> Perhaps PyGTK (Python + GTK bindings) is the best to go these
> days. There are thousands of small and large examples out there
> to copy from ;-). Ruby + GTK seem
Was waiting for someone else to mention that, but no one did.
Perhaps PyGTK (Python + GTK bindings) is the best to go these
days. There are thousands of small and large examples out there
to copy from ;-). Ruby + GTK seems good too, but Ruby is not a
language I bother myself learning, when I can
Kylix rulez ! :-)))
- Original Message -
From: "Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Linux-IL mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "aviad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: GUI language for beginners
> Hi Aviad,
>
> I've decided that a lot of
Quoth Ariel Biener:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
> Heh, you programmers, never pragmatical, always aiming at the overkill.
Note, also, that these are NOT languages ;-)...
> > gtk:
> > * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
> > * looks funkey
aviad wrote:
> i wonder if you could help me choose between
> several languages to develop gui based application
> i got lost between :
> Python,perl,tcl/tk,qt,gtk+
> i need a language that will help me to develop
> a small gui that will communicate with a non gui linux
> program (send parameters v
Quoth Shachar Shemesh:
> aviad wrote:
>
> >Python,perl,tcl/tk,qt,gtk+
SNOBOL/TK!
--
---OFCNL
This is MY list. This list belongs to ME! I will flame anyone I want.
Official Flamer/Cabal NON-Leader [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003, Ariel Biener wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
>
> > A good begginer's GUI tool for a univ. project. Which would be best?
>
> tcl/tk probably.
Ugghh. Tcl/Tk's sorta dying, IMHO...
How about Ruby? Fully OO. Now with Gui hooks (none of which I've
us
you can always claim i was aiming for language... :)
ביום ראשון, 2 בנובמבר 2003, 23:45, נכתב על ידי Ariel Biener:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
>
>
> Heh, you programmers, never pragmatical, always aiming at the overkill.
>
> --Ariel
>
> > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Heh, you programmers, never pragmatical, always aiming at the overkill.
--Ariel
> Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> downsides of each approach.
>
> gtk:
> * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> A good begginer's GUI tool for a univ. project. Which would be best?
tcl/tk probably.
--Ariel
>
>Shachar
>
> aviad wrote:
>
> > i wonder if you could help me choose between
> > several languages to develop gui based application
> > i gotlo
Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
downsides of each approach.
gtk:
* not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
* looks funkey on win32
qt:
* not free in win32
* does not compile with mingw or friends on win32
java:
* funky loo
32 matches
Mail list logo
