On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the
> > > > downsides of each approach.
> > > >
> > > > gtk:
> > > > * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language)
> > > > * looks funkey on win32
> > > >
> > > > qt:
> > > > * not free in win32
> > > Actually it is now.
> > >
> >
> > Free as in speech? I don't think so. Care to enlighten us?
>
> Isn't it dual licensed as GPL/QPL?Doesn't GPL mean free as in
> speech?
>

Qt for UNIX/X is dually licensed as GPL/QPL and as such is free software.
However, from last I heard, this was not the case for the version of Qt
for Win32. I believe the latter is distributed as a binary that is
intended only for the development of open source software. (unless of
course you buy it)

Regards,

        Shlomi Fish

> > Regards,
> >
> >     Shlomi Fish
> >
> >
> > > Ely
>
> behdad
>
> =================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
> echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:         http://t2.technion.ac.il/~shlomif/

Writing a BitKeeper replacement is probably easier at this point than getting
its license changed.

        Matt Mackall on OFTC.net #offtopic.


=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to