On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 07:02:30AM +0200, ik wrote:
> > > I don't like the fact that they do not write the official version of
> > > zaptel and libpri, but refer it according to the Asterisk version
> > > itself.
> >
> > Actually, that is not exactly true. Indeed there is Zaptel 1.2 and 1.4.
> > B
On Dec 25, 2007 11:13 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 10:22:46PM +0200, ik wrote:
> > It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
> > issues that where fixed).
>
> 1.*4*.16.2 is indeed important if you had 1.4.16 or 1.4.16.1 as it ha
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 10:22:46PM +0200, ik wrote:
> It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
> issues that where fixed).
1.*4*.16.2 is indeed important if you had 1.4.16 or 1.4.16.1 as it has
fixed the fix. OTOH, there's a later commit to the same spot in the SVN
wi
It's very important to use the latest version: 1.6.16.2 (some security
issues that where fixed).
I don't like the fact that they do not write the official version of
zaptel and libpri, but refer it according to the Asterisk version
itself.
My 0.0002 cents :)
Ido
On Dec 25, 2007 8:16 PM, Oron Pel
On Tuesday, 25 בDecember 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Regarding asterisk packages in distributions:
>
> There is still no Fedora package. There is a good package at at-rpms.
> And other packages of lesser quality.
Well. Things change:
# yum list 'asterisk*'
Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
L
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:02:35AM +0200, Eli Marmor wrote:
> I haven't read the thread so far, so I apologize if it was already
> mentioned, but there are live-CDs booting with Asterisk, such as
> Medianix (based on Morphix):
>
> http://trac.medianix.org
>
> I have no experience with any o
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 11:07:30AM +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> 3. What didn't Voicetronix deserve? Someone using "OpenPBX" as the name of
> their project?
Yes. The project was renamed. But the domain openpbx.org is still in
dispute.
Anyway, I'm still waiting for CallWeaver to come up with a rel
On Tuesday 25 December 2007, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > If I use OpenPBX.org, does this change things?
>
> I suppose you meant CallWeaver. http://callweaver.org/ (note: they don't
> use trac).
>
> OpenPBX is a free PBX program written by Voicetronix in PERL.
> Voicetronix is an interesting company (h
I haven't read the thread so far, so I apologize if it was already
mentioned, but there are live-CDs booting with Asterisk, such as
Medianix (based on Morphix):
http://trac.medianix.org
I have no experience with any of of them.
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet T
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:06:55AM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> What is the easiest way to install an Asterisk system?
Regarding asterisk packages in distributions:
Several distributions have decent packages of Asterisk. Debian ones are
rather well-maintained, though the Lenny ones are c
Hi,
Astrisk.org.il is your friend .
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
What is the easiest way to install an Asterisk system?
There was a CD that called "astrisk now" (or something ..) that include
astrisk and a web interface to configure it.
Assume I have an X86 computer with a blank hard driv
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
What is the easiest way to install an Asterisk system?
There are specific Asterisk Linux distros which you can download and
install. There seem to be a number of choices.
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+Install+CDROM
The most popular of these seems
You can have ubuntu running asterisk in less than an hour.
I bought a generic-brand compatible modem for $15 on ebay. Installed
it and drivers.
This gave me one physical line, and as many SIP devices as the
computer could handle.
On Dec 24, 2007 4:56 AM, sammy ominsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 24/12/2007, at 10:06, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
What is the easiest way to install an Asterisk system?
Do you want this system to run physical phones or as a registration
server for sip devices? The former is more difficult than the
latter. You need hardware!
As for the latter, I
14 matches
Mail list logo
