Dotan Cohen writes:
>> It's not dialing anything, just DHCP. I insist on this way of
>> connection for the last 5 years, and it works flawlessly. Dialer is
>> only trouble for me.
>
> Really? How did you convince them?
You just tell them you want direct DHCP. I have not used a dialer in
the last
> Is pretty much an almost-default nowdays with Bezeqint (isn't @014 for DSL
> connections only?) when you connect with Hot.
>
> If you don't have it, calling tech support and saying "I want MPLS/without
> dialer" (you can say "my router has issues with the dialup server" in case
> you fall on a n
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > It's not dialing anything, just DHCP. I insist on this way of connection
> for
> > the last 5 years, and it works flawlessly. Dialer is only trouble for me.
> >
>
> Really? How did you convince them?
>
> You just plug the router into the mod
> It's not dialing anything, just DHCP. I insist on this way of connection for
> the last 5 years, and it works flawlessly. Dialer is only trouble for me.
>
Really? How did you convince them?
You just plug the router into the modem and it gets an address? No
username (usually something like u...@
On Feb 28, 2010, at 2:55 PM, Geoff Shang wrote:
Probably using STUN. I don't understand how it works either but it
does. Am also using Callweaver behind a router with no ports
forwarded and it just works, as long as I use a STUN server.
STUN is VoIP over TCP/IP tunneling. You open a TCP
On Sun, 28 Feb 2010, Yuval Hager wrote:
It is working now, connected to my own router, as a client. it started
working right after plugging in, without any port forwarding (not sure how -
Probably using STUN. I don't understand how it works either but it does.
Am also using Callweaver behind
On Sunday 28 February 2010, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Yuval Hager wrote:
> > According to their support guy (who sound very knowledgable), since
> > I have
> > HOT infrastructure, no dialer, and a router, they simply connect
> > their box
> > to *my* router, as an add
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Yuval Hager wrote:
According to their support guy (who sound very knowledgable), since
I have
HOT infrastructure, no dialer, and a router, they simply connect
their box
to *my* router, as an additional client. This means that no port
blocking,
nor QoS is poss
I have a bezeqint landline install set up for tomorrow, and your post
alarmed me, so I called them and asked if this was the case in my setup.
On Thursday 18 February 2010, Alex Shnitman wrote:
> One thing to note is that they put this adapter in front of your PC /
> router (i.e. it connects to
> Since you bought the phone after 1 January 2009, the new consumer protection
> law should have been in effect. You may be able to sue them or get a new
> phone.
>
> The first thing to do is to contact the Orange company Ombudsman (a consumer
> advocate works for them). If you get nothing from th
> I don't know anyone who uses Orange as their landline ISP nor their VoIP
> services, so comments good or bad would be appreciated.
>
After nine years as a happy Orange cellular subscriber, I bought an
N95 last June. It was sent for repair 12 times, and each time it came
back with the same issue.
Thank to all of you for the info.
I think for now I'll stay with Bezek
Valery.
--- On Sat, 2/20/10, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> From: geoffrey mendelson
> Subject: Re: OT: Bezek via netvision
> To: "Valery Reznic"
> Cc: "linux-il."
> Date: Saturday
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Valery Reznic wrote:
Hi, list
Recently Netvision representative contacted me and offered to use
Netvision instead of Bezek as my "phone provider"
Just to keep this in a related thread, Friday's Yediot in their "7
Days" section had a two page ad for Orange as
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:21 PM, Alex Shnitman wrote:
And reliability probably does depend on the area, but also very much
on luck, it appears. I had it working fine here for a year until
disconnections started, and then 9 (!!) visits by HOT technicians
weren't enough solve the problem. This
> > I'm using this service. If your infrastructure (HOT/ADSL) is reliable, it
> > works pretty reliably as well.
> >
> > They give you the AudioCodes MP202 adapter, as someone has already
> > mentioned. One thing to note is that they put this adapter in front of your
> > PC / router (i.e. it co
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:21:05 -0800
> From: alext...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: OT: Bezek via netvision
> To: valery_rez...@yahoo.com; linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using this service. If your infrastructure (HOT/A
On Feb 18, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Alex Shnitman wrote:
I'm using this service. If your infrastructure (HOT/ADSL) is
reliable, it works pretty reliably as well.
If I were offered this deal now I wouldn't go for it.
I've had good luck so far using Spikko (www.spikko.com) for low volume
calli
n -- and
let me tell you that you don't realize how unreliable Internet infrastructure
is here until you put your phone on it.
If I were offered this deal now I wouldn't go for it.
--Alex
- Original Message
From: Valery Reznic
To: linux-il.
Sent: Wed, February 17, 201
On 17 February 2010 17:39, geoffrey mendelson
wrote:
>
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Valery Reznic wrote:
>
>> Hi, list
>>
>> Recently Netvision representative contacted me and offered to use
>> Netvision instead of Bezek as my "phone provider"
>>
>> Do you have any experience with them ?
>
>
> N
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Valery Reznic wrote:
Hi, list
Recently Netvision representative contacted me and offered to use
Netvision instead of Bezek as my "phone provider"
Do you have any experience with them ?
No, but AFAIK they give you a "box" which connects to your aDSL line
or ca
Hi, list
Recently Netvision representative contacted me and offered to use
Netvision instead of Bezek as my "phone provider"
Do you have any experience with them ?
Regards,
Valery
___
Linux-il mailing list
Linux-il@cs.huji.ac.il
http://mailma
21 matches
Mail list logo
