Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-04 Thread Yaron Zabary
Once again a relevant quote (scene 10): " BRIAN: Brothers! Brothers! We should be struggling together! FRANCIS: We are! Ohh. BRIAN: We mustn't fight each other! Surely we should be united against the common enemy! EVERYONE: The Judean People's Front?! BRIAN: No, no! The Rom

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Itamar S Maltz
Actually.. I'm hardly a RH advocate, just wanted to read a decent debate about the subject, and yeah.. i've tried it.. still do.. run it on one of the machines here. i was expecting one of you to bring slackware on to the topic. oh well. Generic means for me atleast, out-of-the-box.. want a proxy

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Henry Ficher
Alex Shnitman wrote: > > Hi, Itamar! > .. so if anyone has suggestions of a good hardware > store in Jerusalem to make friends with, I'll be very glad to hear.) > > -- > Alex Shnitman| http://www.debian.org Ever heard of Aba Computers? Not a good hardware store, bu

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Yanai Krutman wrote: > Why SGI selected RH as their carrier to implement > the 4 Intel based LinuX machine? they claim their SGI-Linux is distribuution-free, but if you want it auto installed (i,e, not patch things manually and all) they have a self-installer for Red Hat, but

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Yanai Krutman
Hi, > > As the people in Aduva, and possibly all Debian addicts will tell you, > "Kakha lo bonim khoma". Red Hat is a mishmash of packages which are too > often badly coordinated with suboptimal defaults. Sadly in a way, it's > the de-facto standard in today's market, so use Mandrake instead of

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Alex Shnitman
Hi, Itamar! On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:27:53PM +0300, you wrote the following: > I really don't understand this whole flame RedHat deal. > I run it in my room as a workstation.. very stable and i hardly ever had any > problems with "package mismatch", all of Knet's Servers farm run on RedHat > i

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Itamar S Maltz wrote: > I really don't understand this whole flame RedHat deal. > I run it in my room as a workstation.. very stable and i hardly ever had any > problems with "package mismatch", all of Knet's Servers farm run on RedHat > including the NOC, and till now it's ve

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
IA>> As the people in Aduva, and possibly all Debian addicts will tell you, IA>> "Kakha lo bonim khoma". Red Hat is a mishmash of packages which are too Yeah. And if you ask Hapoel fans about how good Maccabi plays, you'd get best opinion available :) IA>> often badly coordinated with suboptimal

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Itamar S Maltz
I really don't understand this whole flame RedHat deal. I run it in my room as a workstation.. very stable and i hardly ever had any problems with "package mismatch", all of Knet's Servers farm run on RedHat including the NOC, and till now it's very stable. personally.. my choice to put on those

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Ira Abramov wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Yanai Krutman wrote: > > > Hi netters, > > > > Omer Musaev wrote about the "half-ignorance" of RH, concluding > > his remarks writing about the inability of RH to produce good > > software. Omer could you please give us few examples o

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Ira Abramov
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Yanai Krutman wrote: > Hi netters, > > Omer Musaev wrote about the "half-ignorance" of RH, concluding > his remarks writing about the inability of RH to produce good > software. Omer could you please give us few examples on bad results > using RH? As the people in Aduva, and

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Yanai Krutman
Hi netters, Omer Musaev wrote about the "half-ignorance" of RH, concluding his remarks writing about the inability of RH to produce good software. Omer could you please give us few examples on bad results using RH? Yanai == = Yanai

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Omer Musaev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo) wrote: > > OM>> Third - the problem with Mandrake is that they suck. > > > > Do they? Did you experience this personally or somebody told you? A friend of a friend of neighbour of my sister told me. Dont tell anyone. > > Was it good or at le

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Stanislav Malyshev a.k.a Frodo
OM>> I have to rant. First, MS does good things too. look at OM>> http://research.microsoft.com Yeah. Lots of good things there, like: Linda Stone Appointed To New Position Moving On Up: Rick Rashid And Dan Ling Promoted Hails to Linda, Rick and Dan! But, now microsoft has the answer for tho

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread OR
selling download's CD is legal. where you got the idea that is illegal? > >> Comparing linux to warez... well there is one american linux vendor, >> which sells warez, put it into nasty installer and >> claims that it is selling linux distro. Nowadys, there is one French >> one, too. > >Ouch. >Th

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Evgeny Zemlerub
> > Third - the problem with Mandrake is that they suck. The problem with RH And why exectly Mandrake suck ??? = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Omer Musaev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Moshe Zadka) wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Chen Shapira wrote: > > > > > Ouch. > > > The fact that Debian Gnu/Linux is the only free speach distribution doesn't > > > make RedHat and Mandrake illegal software trafficers. Not any more than Sun > > > is. > > > > Some of

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Moshe Zadka
On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Chen Shapira wrote: > Ouch. > The fact that Debian Gnu/Linux is the only free speach distribution doesn't > make RedHat and Mandrake illegal software trafficers. Not any more than Sun > is. Some of us treat propriety software as uniform badness. This isn't strictly true (noti

Re: My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Omer Musaev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chen Shapira) wrote: > > > Comparing linux to warez... well there is one american linux vendor, > > > which sells warez, put it into nasty installer and > > > claims that it is selling linux distro. Nowadys, there is one French > > > one, too. > > > > Ouch. > > The fac

My distro is better ( was RE: need 4 RH-6.2)

2000-06-01 Thread Chen Shapira
> Comparing linux to warez... well there is one american linux vendor, > which sells warez, put it into nasty installer and > claims that it is selling linux distro. Nowadys, there is one French > one, too. Ouch. The fact that Debian Gnu/Linux is the only free speach distribution doesn't make