Hi,
>
> As the people in Aduva, and possibly all Debian addicts will tell you,
> "Kakha lo bonim khoma". Red Hat is a mishmash of packages which are too
> often badly coordinated with suboptimal defaults. Sadly in a way, it's
> the de-facto standard in today's market, so use Mandrake instead of
> RedHat as the "best of the average", but if I was to build my entire
> company's network and servers from scratch, there is a good chance RPMs
> would have been left outside the door and Debian would have ruled.
>
Do you mean for example RH 6.0 mistake(s)?
Why SGI selected RH as their carrier to implement
the 4 Intel based LinuX machine?
I am working with RH since August 98. We have a program which
calculates ionizing radiation distribution in order to determine
the optimal treatment in radiotherapy. The program is written in
LISP and we have an experimental version ranning in a Intel based
system. We have some troubles on how to translate CT-image into
gray scale but it was solved by a script in C. The way from RH 5.1
to RH 6.0 was quite problematic, but from that version to RH 6.1
was smoothly and now we are preparing RH 6.2. I hope without problems!
Suggestions?,! I am leaving now! Would like to hear from you Tomorrow!
Yanai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
