> But most people don't write 800 lines of configuration code for a mail
> filtering system, or have any filtering system at all, for that matter.
> Perhaps in order to get a broader audience linux-il should move to a
> newsgroup, like israel.comp.os.linux, israel.ilug, or whatever ?
Required me
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999, Ilya Konstantinov wrote about "Re: Lack of enthusiasm":
> What's a member of the ILUG basically? One who's reading the mailing
> list.
> Now, who without very much interest, whiling (able) to help other people
> and having efficient mail sor
Schlomo Schapiro wrote:
> I fully participate in your pain. Over the last year (or two) I tried to
> organize two linux *meetings* (nothing big, just plain meeting), but in
> both cases some poeple showed interest but never more than 3 or 4 and it
> never got anywhere. Now I know already more Lin
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ury Segal wrote:
> "Ralph S. Birnbaum" wrote:
>
> > It's kind of bizarre actually. It's not that the list is unfriendly to
> > newbies, as is evidenced by the list's help towards Dorit Ben
> > Shalom. Or is it only friendly towards female newbies?
>
> About that, I only sugg
"Ralph S. Birnbaum" wrote:
> It's kind of bizarre actually. It's not that the list is unfriendly to
> newbies, as is evidenced by the list's help towards Dorit Ben
> Shalom. Or is it only friendly towards female newbies?
About that, I only suggest you look in the archive for answers to
Mike the
Schlomo Schapiro writes:
> We have to make our ILUG (or GILI :-) more attractive to recruit more
> members, and not only newbies looking for free help but rather (and this
> is more important) professionals and specialists who can raise the level
> of discussion and meetings etc.
You forget t
hapiro
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Ira Abramov wrote:
>
>
> ok, I see noone is really interested in important guest lecturers and
> all, I was going to try and reach Jon Hall today and ask him to
> come, but...
>
> I'm a bit depressed about the lack of enthusiasm this LUG is s
