Re: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode)

2000-05-02 Thread Evgeny Zemlerub
rought reiserfs mailing list archive. This question is asked a lot there. - Original Message - From: Mike Almogy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ury Segal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Linux-il <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 4:59 PM Subject: Re: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck a

Re: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode)

2000-05-02 Thread Ira Abramov
On Tue, 2 May 2000, Mike Almogy wrote: > Hi. > But if i want to use it in order to make my proxy server faster, will it > still have problems ? like Ury said, it's an NFS problem, and what he describes sounds too close to a bug I had with ex2 and NFS with sun machines mounting, it may be an nfsd

Re: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode)

2000-05-02 Thread Mike Almogy
later" - Original Message - From: "Ury Segal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Evgeny Zemlerub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2000 5:17 PM Subject: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode) > Evgen

Re: JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode)

2000-05-02 Thread Evgeny Zemlerub
Yep, kind of forgot about this one (I have read about it on mailinig list of reiserfs). But if you don't use NFS you are pretty safe (at least i am till now) > > I am sorry to tell you that ReiserFS have horrible bugs > in the caching mechanism. It occur when you remove > a file, and then re-c

JFS is bad ( was: Re: fsck and async mode)

2000-05-02 Thread Ury Segal
Evgeny Zemlerub wrote: > > > > crash) > > > > > > Sure! > > > You can use ReiserFS (or other journaling file systems like XFS or > EXT3) - I am sorry to tell you that ReiserFS have horrible bugs in the caching mechanism. It occur when you remove a file, and then re-create a file with the same na