Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I stand by my posting so far.
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's "Effective C++" confirms what I wrote: temps are co
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, David Harel wrote:
> #include
>
> #include
> #include
>
> #include
>
> void sigalrmHandler(int gotsig)
> {
> kill(getppid(), SIGUSR1);
> alarm(2);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char ** argv)
> {
> alarm(2);
> signal(SIGALRM, sigalrmHandler);
a-ha! and since when do
Interestingly, when I ran strace on ls it returned immediately. I tried
piping ls into more and it returned immediately also. Finally, I switched
from my X session to a console and tried ls /var/www/html. While it also
hung, when I broke out of it via Ctrl-C I got an error message about
smb_
Hi,
I have a server process that creates a child process. The server process
receives SIGUSR1 from the child process. The child exec an executable
that has either setitimer() or alarm() (I tried both) and a signal
handler that sends SIGUSR1 to the server.
If the parent doesn't receive SIGUSR1, i
Oleg Goldshmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I stand by my posting so far.
Well, while it was making the round trip to the list and back, I also
made a trip to the bookshelf to check myself. Item 15 of Scott
Meyers's "Effective C++" confirms what I wrote: temps are const, and
for the reasons I
Although this was refrenced in slashdot - I found this article an
interesting and potentially valuable read...
There are several existing consultants in this list and alot of future
consultants wannabe's (like me) so this may intrest that crowd ...
http://www.unixwiz.net/techtips/be-consultant.htm
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
>
> >Hi Shachar,
> >
> >Compilers generate const temporaries to prevent accidental passing of
> >such a temporary to a function that would be able to modify its
> >argument. If that were allowed the programmer would be surprized
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At last, I have time to post again. Thanks, Ira, for the little advices.
And thanks to all the other guys for making fun of Ira's single luser,
it cheered me up a bit.
Ira Abramov wrote:
| Quoting Amir Yalon, from the post of Wed, 19 Jan:
|
|>Hello agai
>>On a different topic, what is the recommended way for keeping a RedHat 9
>>system up to date?
>
>
> Check out http://fedoralegacy.org/
>
> If I'm not mistaken, though, they don't support Redhat 9 any more.
> You should seriously consider upgrading (to Fedora Core 3, probably).
>
Another po
Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Hi Shachar,
Compilers generate const temporaries to prevent accidental passing of
such a temporary to a function that would be able to modify its
argument. If that were allowed the programmer would be surprized
because only the compiler-generated temporary would be modified,
Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
>
> > class a {
> > public:
> > explicit a(int param);
> >
> > a &operator= ( a &that );
> > };
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > a var1(3);
> >
> > var1=a(5);
> >
> > retu
Next Monday (31/1/2005), 18:30, the Haifa Linux Club will once
again meet to hear Zeev Halevi talk about:
SNMP and OpenNMS
Hebrew Abstract available from http://haifux.org/lectures/118/snmp.html
Abstract
First hour will be a technical review of SNMP:
SNMP: Simple Network Manageme
On 30/01/05 18:56, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
If you use remap_page_range (e.g., via
/dev/mem) to mmap a physical address that's valid and unreserved (i.e.,
all of "normal" memory), it fails silently: the PTE is allocated but
left marked as not present (see mm/memory.c/remap_pte_range).
So far it s
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 05:38:07PM +0200, Eran Tromer wrote:
> "Some peculiarities" indeed!
I *am* practicing the art of understatement ;-)
> If you use remap_page_range (e.g., via
> /dev/mem) to mmap a physical address that's valid and unreserved (i.e.,
> all of "normal" memory), it fails si
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
a &operator= ( a &that );
};
int main()
{
a var1(3);
var1=a(5);
return 0;
}
Somewhat surprisingly, this does not compile:
g++ -Wall -gtestcompile.cc -o
Thanks all for the help.
I've tried before to replace the MAP_PRIVATE to MAP_SHARED, but then the
memory is mapped to 0x, and accessing the memory address later
fails with segmentation fault (since when I add 0x24, it yields a
pointer to 0x0023)
Using the nopage operation, go me to
On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 17:37 +0200, David Suna wrote:
> I have a RedHat 9 system. Everything seems to be working fine. I tried
> to do an ls /var/www/html and the command hangs. Doing the same on other
> directories is fine. I assume that some process has the directory open
> which is why the
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005, David Suna wrote about "ls doesn't return on
/var/www/html":
> I have a RedHat 9 system. Everything seems to be working fine. I tried
> to do an ls /var/www/html and the command hangs. Doing the same on other
> directories is fine. I assume that some process has the dir
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
No. What makes a block device a block device is that the actions done
on it (rad/write etc) go through the buffer cache.
I'm willing to be that the memory area in question is used to
communicate with some card/DSP/chip and the last thing Ilan want i
We are looking for trainers for various Open Source technologies.
Background
--
Some of you might know me. Besides trying to herd the Israeli Perl Mongers
I am also running a small training company called
Perl Training Israel. http://www.pti.co.il/
I used to focus on teaching Perl at var
"Alex Vinokur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
> Foo(5) is constant
Sorry, Foo(5) is not constant.
Here is an example.
-- foo.cpp --
#include
using namespace std;
struct Foo
{
int var_;
Foo(int var_i) : var_ (var_i) {}
const Foo& operator= (const
On 30/01/05 16:50, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
remap_page_range has some peculiarities. In particular, are you
setting the pages you are mapping to PageReserved first?
"Some peculiarities" indeed! If you use remap_page_range (e.g., via
/dev/mem) to mmap a physical address that's valid and unreserved
I have a RedHat 9 system. Everything seems to be working fine. I tried
to do an ls /var/www/html and the command hangs. Doing the same on other
directories is fine. I assume that some process has the directory open
which is why the ls is hanging. I tried restarting httpd but that didn't
he
Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
No. What makes a block device a block device is that the actions done
on it (rad/write etc) go through the buffer cache.
I'm willing to be that the memory area in question is used to
communicate with some card/DSP/chip and the last thing Ilan want is to
cache access to t
Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Ilan Finci wrote:
So, I have a char device, which is registered OK, open OK, have couple
of IOCTLs (for some other stuff I need there), and everything works
just fine.
Probably unrelated to your problem, but shouldn't it be a block device?
No. What makes a block device a b
Ilan Finci wrote:
Calling mmap from the user application returns an address, but trying to
access this address, yields an error message:
do_wp_page: bogus page at address 30027024 (page 0xc23358e0)
VM: killing process testSram
(0x30027000 is the address that mmap returned, and I tried to access
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:48:27PM +0200, Ilan Finci wrote:
> Then I've implemented the mmap function, using "remap_page_range",
> everything seems to be working fine (I've checked all returned codes to
> be sure, both in the driver, and in the user space application.
remap_page_range has some
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 01:12:24PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Ilan Finci wrote:
>
> >So, I have a char device, which is registered OK, open OK, have couple
> >of IOCTLs (for some other stuff I need there), and everything works
> >just fine.
>
> Probably unrelated to your problem, but shoul
"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
>
> > class a {
> > public:
> > explicit a(int param);
> >
> > a &operator= ( a &that );
> > };
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > a var1(3);
> >
> >
Ilan Finci wrote:
So, I have a char device, which is registered OK, open OK, have couple
of IOCTLs (for some other stuff I need there), and everything works
just fine.
Probably unrelated to your problem, but shouldn't it be a block device?
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Lingnu Open Source Co
"Shachar Shemesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'm wondering WHY temporary implicit variables
> should be considered const. It's clear that the compiler does consider
> them like that.
[snip]
See
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/browse_frm/thread/
Hi,
I've tried goodle, and reading as many manuals and books I've found, but
I still seems to miss something. So, and help or a pointer to the right
guide will be great.
We have a customized board, with a PPC cpu (MPC 5200 from Motorola),
that I've ported both U-Boot and linux to work with (li
"Omer Zak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Replying to myself, because I forgot one more point:
> From what I remember about C++, you need also a copy constructor in this
> case,
In this case a copy constructor is not invoked.
> because you strive to copy a value to
Omer Zak wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a small program for your viewing pleasure:
class a {
public:
explicit a(int param);
What is the meaning of 'explicit' declaration?
Is this a C++ keyword which was added since I learned C++?
Explicit means
34 matches
Mail list logo
