Original Message
Subject: Re: Debian Reference Card Hebrew translation
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:07 +
From: W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 19:30, Dan Armak wrote:
> There's also a parameter 'konsole -ls' that starts a login shell.
Hmmm... just like xterm(1)... so I started looking for other
compatible options:
1. While the konsole --help shows all "long" options starting
with a '--' (like getopts_long lik
Hi Guys,
Could you help in answering? LaTeX isn't my field of expertise.
--
Regards,
Lior Kaplan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Guides.co.il
Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)
Original Message
Subject: Re: Debian Reference Card Hebrew translation
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:10:07 +
F
Adir Abraham wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Omer Zak wrote:
I would like to know whether it is OK to use a 512MB PC-2700 (333MHz)
module in the same system, and whether I can mix both DDRAMs (to have
total of 768MB).
It is OK. It will do the work. Both modules will work at their lower,
agreed speed.
Well, faster memory *should* work on lower speed slots, however, it
doesn't always work. It's issue with the CAS latency, and it might (or
might not) fit your current memory. Although it's likely your new
memory will work on your board, it is more likely it will not work
together with the curre
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:06:02PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Is this a bet with someone? If so, would consulting a user group be
> considered cheating? If so, can I squirm you out of another dinner for
> keeping it secret? :-)
Heh, there's a real world problem there, trust me. If it wasn'
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Nah, I consider kernel modules just a semi-organized way of patching
the kernel, and kernel changes are not allowed.
*insert standard rant about why "oh, we don't modify the kernel, we
just load a driver!" doesn't mean squat in Linux, and it very much
_does_ modify the kern
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Agreed, in this specific case. I was thinking ps/top might be doing
something funky with the /proc/$PID/* files they read, but it looks
like a very simple open/read/close, e.g.:
open("/proc/6/cmdline", O_RDONLY) = 8
read(8, "", 2047) = 0
close(8)
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 09:41:46PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:15:56PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
>
> > [nitpicking follows]
>
> [nitpickers are us]
The nits have all been picked now, and no disagreements remain.
While we're at it though, here's a considerably
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:15:56PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> [nitpicking follows]
[nitpickers are us]
> I'm not suggesting replacing the file (impossible in /proc w/o changing
> the kernel or the mounting), I'm suggesting replacing the
> *descriptor*.
I'm not suggesting replacing the fi
Hi,
I want to manage a special machine's tree with cvs, but when trying to
import the tree with cvs import(... ), cvs aborts soon with this message:
cvs [import aborted]: reading dev/eda: No such device or address
:-(
How do I bypass this? I know of the cvsignore facility but AFAIK it can
ignore
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 06:42:35PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > Can you surreptitiously modify LD_PRELOAD for the user who'll be running
> > ps/top (by modifying their startup files or whatever)? If you can, write
> > a tiny library that redirects open() to itself and, in
> > case a process
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Omer Zak wrote:
> The motherboard is of 2002 vintage (478 socket, P-4 1.7GHz) and the
> memory is a single PC-2100 256MB DDRAM module (PC-2100 is rated at 266MHz).
My not-so-wild guess is that you have a i845 chipset, or VIA-compatible
chipsets.
> I would like to know whethe
On Monday 30 August 2004 23:25, Oron Peled wrote:
> On Monday 30 August 2004 22:14, David Harel wrote:
> > How do you make konsole add the -l option to the bash
> > invocation or, how do you make things behave as they should?
>
> on "Settings"->"Configure Konsole" there is a session pane.
> You can
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 06:52:51PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> >Make a process which is running with root capabilities appear in a
> >standard ps output as though it belongs to user 'foo'. I can't change
> >ps; I can't change the kernel. I can only use the standard POSIX
> >APIs. I do have ro
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 05:34:15PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> Can you surreptitiously modify LD_PRELOAD for the user who'll be running
> ps/top (by modifying their startup files or whatever)? If you can, write
> a tiny library that redirects open() to itself and, in
> case a process is try
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 05:21:45PM +0300, Alon Altman wrote:
> Can you load a kernel module? If so, you can load one that intercepts the
> access to the /proc filesystem.
Nope, that as well as any other method of patching the running kernel
(there are several...) is covered by the "no kernel ch
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:52:14PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:33:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Muli - could you give a little more background on what are you trying to
> > achieve?
>
> Make a process which is running with root capabilities appear in a
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:33:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Muli - could you give a little more background on what are you trying to
> > achieve?
>
> Make a process which is running with root capabilities appear in a
> standard ps output a
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Yosef Meller wrote:
>
> > Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
> > >
> > > BTW: The Bank Hapoalim site that I'm using as well is even worse... In
> > > fact, it does not work at all. It's been 6 months now that Hapoalim tries
> > > to
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:33:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Muli - could you give a little more background on what are you trying to
achieve?
Make a process which is running with root capabilities appear in a
standard ps output as though it belongs to user 'fo
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:33:40PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Muli - could you give a little more background on what are you trying to
> achieve?
Make a process which is running with root capabilities appear in a
standard ps output as though it belongs to user 'foo'. I can't change
ps; I
Here's what the 1st match in google's groups section had:
PC2100 RAM can run up to 266MHz while PC2700 RAM can
run up to 333MHz. The actual speed is dependant on the motherboard.
Both can run at lower speeds.
The search was for `PC-2100 vs. PC-2700'. Usual disclaimer applies. If
no
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:48:53PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
Depending on whom you wish to deceive (human or another program) and how
clever they are, you may want to try something as simple as
(oh-dear-God-I-don't-believe-I'm-gonna-say-it) naming uid 0 something
ot
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:48:53PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:56:50PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> > Salutations!
> >
> > I would like to have a process that will
> > - run with de-facto root priviledges (can do anything root can do)
> > - appears to be running u
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:56:50PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> Salutations!
>
> I would like to have a process that will
> - run with de-facto root priviledges (can do anything root can do)
> - appears to be running under a different user with standard ps / top
> and friends
Depending on who
My desktop has 256MB memory, and nowadays the swap area gets used once
in a while (RedHat 8.0 together with Mozilla, httpd and mysqld).
So, I would like to add more memory to the computer.
The motherboard is of 2002 vintage (478 socket, P-4 1.7GHz) and the
memory is a single PC-2100 256MB DDRAM
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:33:30PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: I'm not the process you think I
> am":
> > You can try doing this with Linux's little-known "capabilities" feature.
> > This allows you to have any user id, but with some of root's c
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:21:47PM +0300, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> You can try doing this with Linux's little-known "capabilities" feature.
> This allows you to have any user id, but with some of root's capabilities,
> like binding any network address or writing any file (for example)
> magically tur
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: I'm not the process you think I
am":
> On second thought, while it's easy to have a root (uid 0) owned process
> with lesser privelges (useful for enhanced security), it's less clear how
> to use the "capabilities" mechanism to elevate the capabi
Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Yosef Meller wrote:
Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
BTW: The Bank Hapoalim site that I'm using as well is even worse... In
fact, it does not work at all. It's been 6 months now that Hapoalim tries
to fix the problem with wire transfers through
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Re: I'm not the process you think I
am":
> You can try doing this with Linux's little-known "capabilities" feature.
> This allows you to have any user id, but with some of root's capabilities,
> like binding any network address or writing any file (f
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Yosef Meller wrote:
> Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
> >
> > BTW: The Bank Hapoalim site that I'm using as well is even worse... In
> > fact, it does not work at all. It's been 6 months now that Hapoalim tries
> > to fix the problem with wire transfers through internet.
>
Alexander V. Karelin wrote:
BTW: The Bank Hapoalim site that I'm using as well is even worse... In
fact, it does not work at all. It's been 6 months now that Hapoalim tries
to fix the problem with wire transfers through internet.
Actually the reason I stay with Poalim and do not move my accou
Salutations!
I would like to have a process that will
- run with de-facto root priviledges (can do anything root can do)
- appears to be running under a different user with standard ps / top
and friends
Any ideas on how to achieve this? I tried setting the real UID to X
and the effective UID to
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004, Ira Abramov wrote about "OT: changing banks and customer service
(was: Bank Leumi's old site - works (again) with mozilla)":
> I think I actually PREFFER a bank with no online access these days...
Why? Especially when with "social engineering" much more damage could be
done
Shachar,
1) Yashir Ha Rishon is a branch of Leumi. It's official banking ID is
10-678.
2) Their site doesn't work with IE either, btw. I'm using it once in a
while, but there are a lot of functions that do not work. And when it
comes to something like foreign exchange operations - it's impossi
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
SS>> I have closed my account with Hayashir Harishon due to their
SS>> indifferent behavior. MAYBE Leumi will be better.
Isn't Hayashir and Leumi the same company? Their web banking seem to be
indentical, even the same login works for it, and Hayashir seems to be
just a
Quoting Shachar Shemesh, from the post of Tue, 31 Aug:
>
> They didn't give me much more, but a little more. See
> http://www.consumer.org.il/
>
> I have closed my account with Hayashir Harishon due to their indifferent
> behavior. MAYBE Leumi will be better.
well, I'm sorry that of all the ba
SS>> I have closed my account with Hayashir Harishon due to their
SS>> indifferent behavior. MAYBE Leumi will be better.
Isn't Hayashir and Leumi the same company? Their web banking seem to be
indentical, even the same login works for it, and Hayashir seems to be
just a branch of Leumi given sep
40 matches
Mail list logo
