http://www.x.org/Downloads_ReleaseNotes.html
anyone tried it?know if it got into xfree?
does it work?:)
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsub
Quoting David Harel, from the post of Wed, 19 Feb:
> Ok,
>
> Unplug works but it is clumsy. Here is a better one. I use the command
> modprobe with -r printer to release it and omitting the -r to reload it.
> trivial, isn't it?
> Since this is a privileged command I had to wrap it with a small p
Quoting Aviram Jenik, from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
>
> 2. Ira mentioned something about linux.org.il's owner being hostile (or
> specifically, Ira-hostile). Looking at the whois records, the zone
> contact is one "Ira Abramov", from Eliezer Yaffe 13/5 Ra'anana. The
> email points to ira.abramov.o
Ok,
Unplug works but it is clumsy. Here is a better one. I use the command
modprobe with -r printer to release it and omitting the -r to reload it.
trivial, isn't it?
Since this is a privileged command I had to wrap it with a small program
I wrote in C that does just what we said and to it's ex
Hi,
I believe that people who _don't_ want two copies can deal with it quiet
easily: for instance, for procmail, see the formail -D option (and the
procmail W flag). I don't know what other means people use to filter
mail, but I guess there are similar methods for other mail filterring
programs.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:01:36PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I believe it worked for me in the past. However today I have tried it
> with some other module and got:
>
> kernel-source-2.4.20$ make SUBDIRS=drivers/pnp modules
> gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -o
>
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 13:36, Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
> > "Nadav" == Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Nadav> Too Stallman-like? Gilad, you can take that as a compliment
> Nadav> :)
>
> I don't have anything against Gilad, and indeed believe that he did an
> excellent job ov
On http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Linux/maillists/02/05/msg00170.html
Dan Aloni wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:09:09PM +0300, Amir Sela wrote:
>
> > Is there a way, to compile a single module out of the kernel source
> > tree, without fiddling about manually with the Makefiles and such
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 09:58, Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
> > "Ira" == Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ira> anyone been there and cares to share any news and views they
> Ira> collected? how was GBY's talk about Hamakor?
>
> I was there. I thought that GBY's talk was quite g
I personally do this too, though... sometimes I forget.
Since I don't post that often, it's not too much of a problem
to edit the "To:" field, and I never have more than 1 address
for the list there to edit anyway.
Eli
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:21:34 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not famil
On Tue, 2003-02-18 at 17:34, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> Maybe this is a case of 'dumbed down users' unable to operate the
> Outlook mail client? (if this is a case, maybe we should re-open the
> "Linux for Grandparents" thread)
FYI: a recent thread on the linux-elitists mailing list recently
discusse
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Aviram Jenik wrote:
> The recent discussion left me with two questions:
> 1. How did everyone (namely Ira, Muli and Amos) come to the conclusion
> outlook can't do "reply-to-all" and show the mailing list name in the
> 'to'? Fact is, it can. Granted, it requires the use of the
The recent discussion left me with two questions:
1. How did everyone (namely Ira, Muli and Amos) come to the conclusion
outlook can't do "reply-to-all" and show the mailing list name in the
'to'? Fact is, it can. Granted, it requires the use of the
"reply-to-all" button on the toolbar, which is so
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote about "Bork, Bork, Bork!":
> According to
> http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-2439013,00.html
>
> Opera has a new special version which "messes" with MSN.com, translating its
> text into "swedish chef" language [1].
By the way, for Swedish Chef fans,
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003, Ira Abramov wrote about "Re: Guessing filesystem while
unmounted":
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> > That was unintentional and might go to show my point that I couldn't
> > tell (or it was very obscure to me) whether your message was private
> >
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> No, I just press, as always, "reply all" which doesn't include the
> mailing list's address but only the sender's address.
> From: "Ira Abramov"
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> "Reply all" gave me the following two:
>
> Ira Abramov; [EMAIL
No, I just press, as always, "reply all" which doesn't include the
mailing list's address but only the sender's address.
Here are the headers of your current message:
Received: from webcollage.com (199.203.179.226 [199.203.179.226]) by
On 18/02/2003 14:52, Assaf Flatto wrote:
Does anyone remember the name of the hardware store that had a table in
the Raanana insta -party ?
Barinbox Computers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
04-6222990
Sagi
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> That was unintentional and might go to show my point that I couldn't
> tell (or it was very obscure to me) whether your message was private
> or public.
if your MUA is so "dumbed down" that you can't tell if a mail was sent
to you, the lis
That was unintentional and might go to show my point that I couldn't
tell (or it was very obscure to me) whether your message was private
or public.
> -Original Message-
> From: Muli Ben-Yehuda
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone remember the name of the hardware store that had a table in
the Raanana insta -party ?
Can any one provide me they details off list ?
Thanks
=
Assaf Flatto
System Administrator
IBM Global Services Israel
Tel : 972-8-9182218
cellular 972-52-385094
e-m
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> I have nothing against iglu, it's just that "linux.org.il" sounds
> "cleaner", that's all.
you better explain yourself, mister! what's dirty about IGLU?
> > well, it's been going on for 6 years since the linux.org.il domain was
> > bought
Hi,
I am looking for a way to deactivate/reactivate a USB device on Linux
(RH7.3), in my case a Lexmark printer.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the comman
Dear Amos,
When I replied privately to you in the message you quote, I did it
for a reason. By replying to the list, you are making tje unforgivable
sin of making private a public correspondence. With every additional
message you send, you take another gigantic leap towards my
killfile. Please ha
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> > >
> > > so was I until I switched from pine to mutt :)
> >
> > Currently I read it on Outlook at work (tried to forward
> back to home
> > but things got weared).
>
> why not subscribe your home address instead?
It's a long (techni
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:59:35PM +0200, Ira Abramov wrote:
> Quoting Reuven M. Lerner, from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
> >
> > But I still would have liked to hear more of an overview of where
> > things have come from, and where they're going -- and why an amuta is
> > necessary and good. (I hap
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:41:01PM +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Why can't people learn to use procmail? it's annoying!
> >
> > Because part of supporting open standards is that you don't
> have to use
> > specific software in order to enjoy a forum properly. I
> can't use procmail
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Can you give a few more details? What generally-useful features of OpenOffice
> won't be available in Hebrew initially?
> (shameless plug) at least somebody is working on a spellchecker :)
And someone else is beta-testing AbiWord on Hebrew documents. :-
Quoting Reuven M. Lerner, from the post of Tue, 18 Feb:
>
> But I still would have liked to hear more of an overview of where
> things have come from, and where they're going -- and why an amuta is
> necessary and good. (I happen to think that Hamakor is one of the
> best things that has happened
I didn't assume anything, it's just that when I do a "reply all" to
messages like yours (which I assume to have arrived to me via the list,
due to the list's "signature" at the bottom) I get
"Shachar Shemesh; [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
as the "To" addresses.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shachar S
> -Original Message-
> From: Muli Ben-Yehuda
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:29 PM
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Guessing filesystem while unmounted
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
> >
> > Why can't the mailing list server put itself in t
> "Nadav" == Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nadav> Too Stallman-like? Gilad, you can take that as a compliment
Nadav> :)
I don't have anything against Gilad, and indeed believe that he did an
excellent job overall. And it may well be that the forum *needed* a
"free as in fr
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
>
> Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field?
> It's annoying!
Why can't people learn to use procmail? it's annoying!
ObLinux: Alan Cox has decreed that 2.5 is "approaching usability". (My
words, not his). G
> -Original Message-
> From: Ira Abramov
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> lshell.com
> ]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Reply to list vs. no - suggeted solution to accomodate
> everyo ne
>
>
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED], from the post of Tue,
That's part of the problem. You don't have to change them. For example,
not only is it ok, but I actually prefer if you just click "reply to all".
The problem is that you don't know whether I prefer that or not. You are
ASSUMING that, since you don't like to get two copies, I wouldn't like
this
I'm not familiar with previous instances of this discussion, I just know
I'm very annoyed from having to keep editing the "to" field every time I
reply to this list.
Why are there three addresses for this list?
> -Original Message-
> From: Shachar Shemesh
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2
Hi,
It seems that there are two types of people on this list, with the
following motives (both I can understand).
A. People who want the people who click "reply to all" to send them two
messages when replying to them.
B. People who only want to get each message once, regardless of whether
they
Reuven M. Lerner wrote:
"Ira" == Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ira> anyone been there and cares to share any news and views they
Ira> collected? how was GBY's talk about Hamakor?
Havn't been to the last session about open source - had to leave in
order to get
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003, Uri Itscowits wrote about "Re: Guessing filesystem while
unmounted":
> First I want to thank everybody for the time & effort,
> ( although some responses show,
> some guys did NOT spend enough time reading my problem all the way {:< )
:)
I hope my response wasn't on
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003, Reuven M. Lerner wrote about "ISOC day at Kfar HaMakabiya":
> Ira> anyone been there and cares to share any news and views they
> Ira> collected? how was GBY's talk about Hamakor?
>...
> (c) he was too Stallman-like for my taste,
Too Stallman-like? Gilad, you can ta
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 11:09:36AM +0200, Arik Baratz wrote:
>
> Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field? It's annoying!
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yedidyah Bar-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> [snip]
>
> > In practice, it happened to me quite many t
Why can't the mailing list server put itself in the Reply-To: field? It's annoying!
> -Original Message-
> From: Yedidyah Bar-David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
[snip]
> In practice, it happened to me quite many times that a used FAT
> partition was mke2fsed, used (as ext2), and then mount
> "Ira" == Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ira> anyone been there and cares to share any news and views they
Ira> collected? how was GBY's talk about Hamakor?
I was there. I thought that GBY's talk was quite good, although (a)
he was the final speaker, (b) he was cut off du
43 matches
Mail list logo
