On Wed, 1 Jan 2003 03:53:56 +0200
Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have heard lately on 2 different occasions here that there could be
> a problem when copying a new version of a binary over the old one while
> the old one is running.
Time for testing:
[oron@mercury test]$ cp /
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Erez Boym wrote:
> I have a small problem with my Internet and NIC. I
> suppose it's a small thing but I cant find the answer
> to that.
[... snipped ...]
> So to avoid waiting on boot I have used netconfig
> again to install my NIC with an imaginary IP
> 118.118.0.0 and net
Hi,
I have a small problem with my Internet and NIC. I
suppose it's a small thing but I cant find the answer
to that.
I have a Modem and a NIC on the same machine. As long
as my NIC is set with a dynamic IP (Configured using
netconfig) my Mozilla browser works perfectly, but my
NIC, since I dont
Someone I worked with is looking for a capable Linux programmer for a
porting project on a free-lance basis.
Required knowledge:
- Linux (obviously)
- GCC tool-chain (Cross compilation a big plus)
- C (read/write)
- Java (read/write)
- Makefiles
Good to have:
- Fortran (read only)
- Portin
I have heard lately on 2 different occasions here that there could be
a problem when copying a new version of a binary over the old one while
the old one is running. I have also read the opposite and I believe that
many Debian users who actively track the Debian archive will testify for
the oppo
after a year of experience with adsl i want to add 3 nis:
1) assumming u want to use persist, u must understand it doesn't do any pinging, just
reconnect
if pppd knows it has been disconnected. inorder for it to know it was disconnected u
need to use
lcp-echo-interval n to ping the other peer. and
Quoth Oron Peled:
> On 31 Dec 2002 21:05:21 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i tried adding:
> > CMserv1.foo.org
> > DMfoo.org
>
> Nobody these days edits sendmail.cf directly, you should use
> the m4 technique to configure sendmail (covered in Oreily's Bat-Book).
Oron, come on! You're getting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I keep seeing people talk about pinging the other side of their
ADSL line in order to discover whether it's still up and re-run
pppd if ping fails.
Have anyone of them tried pppd's "persist" option and decided that
it's not good enough?
Except for cases when pppd
At 20:17 +0200 on 31/12/2002, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
"no dual pentuim 5 required"? [too technical, and will get out-dated]
How about "does not require a supercomputer"?
Herouth
--
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOME PAGE: http://herouth.port5.com/
===
sorry, this is another of the old mails resurrected by evolution ;-)
cheers,
erez.
Oron Peled wrote:
On 31 Dec 2002 21:05:21 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i tried adding:
CMserv1.foo.org
DMfoo.org
to /etc/sendmail.cf
Nobody these days edits sendmail.cf directly, you should use
the
On 31 Dec 2002 21:05:21 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i tried adding:
>
> CMserv1.foo.org
> DMfoo.org
>
>
> to /etc/sendmail.cf
Nobody these days edits sendmail.cf directly, you should use
the m4 technique to configure sendmail (covered in Oreily's Bat-Book).
Than, you may send us a meaning
i think this is a very smart bug in evolution.
evolution foresaw that tzafrir will anser me so it sent him a thank-you
email ahead of time ...
twilight zone .. ;-)
erez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, the messages were sent by smtp before i understood whats
happened. and the smtp server
On Tuesday, Dec 31, 2002, at 21:08 Asia/Jerusalem, Ilya Konstantinov
wrote:
1. How can I configure Konqueror to render the pages using the Mozilla
engine? I like using Konqueror because of its better usability but I'm
getting tired of all those khtml bugs.
There was a thing called KMozilla o
On 31/12/2002 21:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i need to connect to an ssl-imap server.
currently i use stunnel, but it's stripped binary is 700k in size
which is too much.
does anyone knows on a smaller ssl-wrapper (client only) ?
I think that fetchmail can do that. Just checked, and the
well, the messages were sent by smtp before i understood whats happened.
and the smtp server is out of my control ...
it looks like for some reson, evolution started resending my old mails
to the original recepients.
so except for confusion, i do not think any harm was done.
( mistook inbox for
thanks tzafrir,
at last, someone answers the question i asked.
openssl s_client looks promising.
no offense guys/girls, but all other answerd the question i didn't ask.
thanks again tzafrir
erez.
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 23:18, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
>
> > On Tue
Shlomi Fish wrote:
1. How can I configure Konqueror to render the pages using the Mozilla
engine? I like using Konqueror because of its better usability but I'm
getting tired of all those khtml bugs.
There was a thing called KMozilla once. I don't know if it's still
maintained, but at its time
hi
i need to connect to an ssl-imap server.
currently i use stunnel, but it's stripped binary is 700k in size
which is too much.
does anyone knows on a smaller ssl-wrapper (client only) ?
erez.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [E
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 17:17, Michael Sternberg wrote:
>
> Just a proposition - can't you use port forwarding capabilities of SSH ?
is there a way to use ssh to connect to an ssl imap server ?
ssh imap-server 993 ?
i dont think so, but correct me if I'm wrong
erez.
>
> --
>
hi
my evolution got crazy and started to mail some of the emails from my
inbox to people on my adresbook.
before i could stop it it already sent hundreds of mails
does anyone know on such a virus ???
btw: system: linux redhat 8.0
erez.
=
On Tuesday, Dec 31, 2002, at 20:42 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
2. Is there any way I can build Konqueror's enhanced browsing
pseudo-URLs
into Mozilla?
Here you go:
http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html
=
To u
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 19:11, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On 2 Jul 2002, Erez Doron wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 17:17, Michael Sternberg wrote:
> > >
> > > Just a proposition - can't you use port forwarding capabilities of SSH ?
> >
> > is there a way to use ssh to connect to an ssl imap server ?
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 13:32, Henry Ficher wrote:
> Erez Doron wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > i have a server called serv1.foo.org
> >
> > whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
are there any ipaq on linux users on this list ( except me ) ?
erez.
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
i have a server called serv1.foo.org
whenever i send unqualified mail from root, it is sent from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the problem is that though foo.org exists, serv1.foo.org does not, so my
isp returns the mail because unqualified sender domain.
i tried adding:
CMserv1.foo.org
DMfoo.org
Oron Peled wrote:
Completely true. That's why I think we should change strategy.
The emphasis should be on:
- The web team you hired doesn't follow web standards.
- Many clients (e.g: people with other IE versions)
may be affected.
- You wouldn't know it (it looks ok on your computer).
- It
1. How can I configure Konqueror to render the pages using the Mozilla
engine? I like using Konqueror because of its better usability but I'm
getting tired of all those khtml bugs.
2. Is there any way I can build Konqueror's enhanced browsing pseudo-URLs
into Mozilla? What I went is typing "gg:he
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Guy Cohen wrote:
> > Surely you are joking? To make a site (as complex as it is) to be compliant
> > with all browsers (or rfcs) is, roughly estimated, 5% more work to someone
> > who knows what he's doing (i.e. any second level programmer in Ind
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This remoinds me - I'm reading now "The Complete DHTML refference"
> (or something like that) from O'Reilly (don't sniger - this book
> is all about portability) and was wondering how feasable would it
> be to stick an "IE compatibility module" in Moz
On 31 Dec 2002 14:34:56 +0200
Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's all awareness. Neither the web development company nor their client
> think that there are any normal people in their right mind who are not
> using IE. I think it never even gets to the point where they count
> percentag
Hi,
I keep seeing people talk about pinging the other side of their
ADSL line in order to discover whether it's still up and re-run
pppd if ping fails.
Have anyone of them tried pppd's "persist" option and decided that
it's not good enough?
I just put it on (with "maxfail 0" so it will retry for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can not get it to show hebrew on my ipaq (linux)
it does work on my pc though.
what am i doing wrong ?
ipaq terminal:
bash-2.03# export LC_ALL=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# export LC_TYPE=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# export LANG=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# gpe-mail
You
I thought this might interest the list.
I created a Word document at work. Since I wanted to be able to read it at
home, I saved as RTF. The document was created by pasting from the Palm Pilot
desktop on Windows to MS Word. I guess that because of incompatibilities
between the two programs, I g
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 04:41:06PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> well, i managed to save it to pdf compressed as someone suggested.
> it compressed from 17mb ps to 230kb pdf which is the size of jpeg printed.
> isn't there a compressed psz(pg.gz) or something?
> the problem with the small programs t
i can not get it to show hebrew on my ipaq (linux)
it does work on my pc though.
what am i doing wrong ?
ipaq terminal:
bash-2.03# export LC_ALL=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# export LC_TYPE=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# export LANG=iw_IL.ISO-8859-8
bash-2.03# gpe-mail
(process:4785): Gdk-WARNING **:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> well, i managed to save it to pdf compressed as someone suggested.
> it compressed from 17mb ps to 230kb pdf which is the size of jpeg printed.
> isn't there a compressed psz(pg.gz) or something?
> the problem with the small programs to convert jpeg2ps an
On 31 Dec 2002, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:47, Omer Zak wrote:
>
> > I have a simple suggestion:
> >
> > As a pretty good approximation, "no one" knows about Linux, but "everyone"
> > knows about Mac.
> >
> > So an effort focused at getting Israeli Web masters to make thei
well, i managed to save it to pdf compressed as someone suggested.
it compressed from 17mb ps to 230kb pdf which is the size of jpeg printed.
isn't there a compressed psz(pg.gz) or something?
the problem with the small programs to convert jpeg2ps and things like that is that i
don't know how
to add
Quoting Geoffrey S. Mendelson, from the post of Tue, 31 Dec:
>
> We just went to an online food ordering site for lunch. Depsite that 90%
> of the users here get a popup on every screen complaining that they are
> not using I.E. (most people use mozilla, which does work) and yours
> truely complai
Guy Cohen wrote:
> Surely you are joking? To make a site (as complex as it is) to be compliant
> with all browsers (or rfcs) is, roughly estimated, 5% more work to someone
> who knows what he's doing (i.e. any second level programmer in India, Europa,
> USA (though more expensive), Australia and so
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 15:47, Omer Zak wrote:
> First of all, I am taking the liberty of renaming the thread's Subject to
> reflect the current reality.
Good! :-)
> I have a simple suggestion:
>
> As a pretty good approximation, "no one" knows about Linux, but "everyone"
> knows about Mac.
>
> S
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 04:07:52PM +0200, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
> Omer Zak wrote:
> > As a pretty good approximation, "no one" knows about Linux, but "everyone"
> > knows about Mac.
> >
> > So an effort focused at getting Israeli Web masters to make their Web
> > sites accessible to Mac by
This remoinds me - I'm reading now "The Complete DHTML refference"
(or something like that) from O'Reilly (don't sniger - this book
is all about portability) and was wondering how feasable would it
be to stick an "IE compatibility module" in Mozilla? Has anyone
though of that? I don't know Mozill
Omer Zak wrote:
> As a pretty good approximation, "no one" knows about Linux, but "everyone"
> knows about Mac.
>
> So an effort focused at getting Israeli Web masters to make their Web
> sites accessible to Mac by modifying the Web sites to comply with
> standards is likely to be more successful
Here here to that!
Education can be found the source of many solutions. Maybe aproaching
such schools and offering them help with setting up Linux-based classes
will be beneficial to both parties - the schools get lower cost of ownership
(should probably be shown very good return on investment (R
Quoting Oron Peled, from the post of Tue, 31 Dec:
> (politely and rationaly) complain to, thus conveying the message:
>"It's better be standard compliant then to deal with bad
> publicity from tech savy people about the quality of your
> web site".
and the PHB hears "please a small bun
Quoting Alex Shnitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It usually goes like this. The boss wants a web site, so he hires a web
> development company to create one. The developers in this company are
> obviously not people with a dozen years of computing experience, but
> people who have gone through a coup
First of all, I am taking the liberty of renaming the thread's Subject to
reflect the current reality.
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Alon Altman wrote:
> What do you think? Any more suggestions?
I have a simple suggestion:
As a pretty good approximation, "no one" knows about Linux, but "everyone"
knows
> From: Oron Peled
>
> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:41:55 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think you missed the main point:
> >
> > 5. Bottom line - drives away potential business (customers,
> partners) and
> > misses the whole point of having a web site.
>
> Very good, but now we should th
I suggest doing an online poll of user browsing prefrences.
Ask questions such as:
1. Rate each of the following factors from 1(not important) to 5(very
important) for your browsing experience:
FACTORS: Loading speed, navigation speed, lack of popup windows, does it
work on my sy
On Tuesday 31 December 2002 14:34, Alex Shnitman wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 09:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > > I think you missed the main point:
> > >
> > > 5. Bottom line - drives away potential business (customers, partners)
> > > and misses the whole point of having a web site.
> >
> > Thi
"Tzahi Fadida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a bit OT: I want to create a postscript file from a bmp file. when i
> print to a file, it creats a huge 17mb postcript file, which loads
> and shows ok, but its too big. is there any way to create a
> compressed .PS file? p.s: when i print a jpg to a
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 08:41:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think you missed the main point:
>
> 5. Bottom line - drives away potential business (customers, partners) and
> misses the whole point of having a web site.
Very good, but now we should think of means to substantiate this
claim. Ot
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> a bit OT:
> I want to create a postscript file from a bmp file.
Linux comes with a lot of to utilities
at least on my Mandrake 9.0 installation.
Try pnmtops (while first using the GIMP and/or pngtopnm). I also have
imagetops. ;-) It seems to have come w
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 02:20:57PM +0200, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
> a bit OT:
> I want to create a postscript file from a bmp file. when i print to a file, it creats
> a huge 17mb postcript file, which loads and shows ok, but its too big. is there any
> way to create a compressed .PS file?
> p.s: when
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 09:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> > I think you missed the main point:
> >
> > 5. Bottom line - drives away potential business (customers, partners) and
> > misses the whole point of having a web site.
>
> This they won't agree with, on the basis of "98% of customers use IE
>
Quoting Shaul Karl, from the post of Mon, 30 Dec:
> Summary: Can you advise why I have a problem with www.penguin.org.il?
> The browser trims the page according to its own window width but does
> not provide an horizontal scroll bar.
>
I see it perfectly with Galeon 1.2.7 (Debian Sid)
--
Rebe
a bit OT:
I want to create a postscript file from a bmp file. when i print to a file, it creats
a huge 17mb postcript file, which loads and shows ok, but its too big. is there any
way to create a compressed .PS file?
p.s: when i print a jpg to a file, i get the same result, so i think its something
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Shoshannah Forbes wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, Dec 31, 2002, at 09:50 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>
> > Another point is that users would like more minimalistic and
> > standards-compliant sites better than sites with a lot of
> > bandwidth-overloading, DHTML/JS, useless bell
On
http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Linux/maillists/02/12/msg00445.html
Daniel Ariel spoke about nano and mentioned that as far as he knows
there is no packaging of the fribidi in Debian. This is wrong. The
debianized version of fribidi is avialable as libfribidi0.
--
Shaul Karl, [EMAIL
On Tuesday, Dec 31, 2002, at 09:50 Asia/Jerusalem, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Another point is that users would like more minimalistic and
standards-compliant sites better than sites with a lot of
bandwidth-overloading, DHTML/JS, useless bells and whistells madness.
Making your site basic and portable w
Yes, that's the spirit of my message.
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Shlomi Fish
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ilshell.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Mila Tova on Bank Leumi site and linux/mozilla client
>
>
> On 31 Dec 2002,
Well, we are drifting into the web and user interface design territory, but
the point I made can be concluded from other points in the original list -
pop-ups,
annoying graphics, heavy load, relliance on particular browser version (even
particular IE versions) all will drive away potential customer
On 31 Dec 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I think you missed the main point:
> >
> > 5. Bottom line - drives away potential business (customers, partners) and
> > misses the whole point of having a web site.
>
> This they won't agree with, on the basis of "98% of cus
64 matches
Mail list logo
