Quoting Eli Marmor, from the post of Thu, 24 Oct:
> 2. If you use AMD (or Transmeta/Geode?), compile for i586 even if you
>have i686-compatible processor (e.g. Athlon etc.).
why not compile for athlon? I thought gcc knows how to optimize for
it...
--
|)0|\|7 /\/\355 \/\/1|O /\/\'/ /\/\4|)
To summarize the thread, let me repeat something which I wrote in
personal, and expand:
(convention: iXXX refers to compilation, while XXX refers to the CPU
itslef):
1. i586 is superior to i386, in any case (of course assuming the CPU is
586 or up...).
2. i686 is superior to i586, only when mu
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:51:27AM +, Meir Kriheli wrote:
> I apply other optimization as well to my system including
> -fomit-frame-pointer
> -funroll-loops -falign-functions=4 etc. Note that this will result in larger
> binaries/libs.
At least the 'omit-frame-pointer' part might make deb
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 20:35, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> áéåí ùìéùé 22 àå÷èåáø 2002, 02:08, Meir Kriheli ëúá:
> > Something gone wrong here. kde 3.X should load faster than 2.2.2 (and it
> > does here).
> >
> > This times are closer to the Gentoo I run on a machine at the office
> > (celleron 4
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:07:49PM +0200, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
> áéåí ùðé 21 àå÷èåáø 2002, 23:37, Eli Marmor ëúá:
> > Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> > > This is not accurate.
> > > What these results mean is that the gcc optimizations for 586 and for
> > > 686 are not very different. The CPU it
áéåí ùìéùé 22 àå÷èåáø 2002, 02:08, Meir Kriheli ëúá:
> Something gone wrong here. kde 3.X should load faster than 2.2.2 (and it
> does here).
>
> This times are closer to the Gentoo I run on a machine at the office
> (celleron 400 + 256MB) running kde 3.0.4, not to the hardware you describe.
>
> Ko
áéåí ùìéùé 22 àå÷èåáø 2002, 11:32, Ira Abramov ëúá:
> Quoting Eli Marmor, from the post of Tue, 22 Oct:
> because some people prefer "plain vanilla" with no extra optimizations.
> that's what Gentoo is for - for the people who DO.
>
> and you'll be surprised, ppl still run a few 486 machines here a
áéåí ùðé 21 àå÷èåáø 2002, 23:37, Eli Marmor ëúá:
> Yedidyah Bar-David wrote:
> > This is not accurate.
> > What these results mean is that the gcc optimizations for 586 and for
> > 686 are not very different. The CPU itself might optimize things quite
> > differently, with or without the help of th
reboot mandrake 9, open konsole and do "tail -f /var/log/messages" (as
root) -
then plug the modem and see what it's writing on the log.
As soon as I plug the modem in, Linux hangs.
I will try what you suggested though - maybe it will print something before
hanging.
Alexander Maryanovsky.
A
Hi,
This is a "micro" version of how-to to use the Rotal ADSL modem - it's quite
simple:
1. Download the CVS snapshot (the driver is ECI ADSL version 0.6pre3) from
http://www.penguin.org.il/~hetz/usb-adsl-cvs.tar.gz
2. untar (tar zxvf usb-ads-cvs.tar.gz) ; cd into the directory and simply do
Quoting Kairo Kalamees, from the post of Tue, 22 Oct:
> Subject: Re: unsubscribe
I'm sorry, Dave, but I just can't allow you to do that.
msg22665/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 19:50, Alexander Maryanovsky wrote:
> >huh?? What linux distribution do you use? I use redhat 7.3 with their
> >2.4.18-10 kernel with Intel 82801 chipset - no crashes here while
> > rebooting,
>
> I've tried both RedHat 8.0 and Mandrake 9.0 with the exact same result -
huh?? What linux distribution do you use? I use redhat 7.3 with their
2.4.18-10 kernel with Intel 82801 chipset - no crashes here while rebooting,
I've tried both RedHat 8.0 and Mandrake 9.0 with the exact same result - if
the modem is plugged in, it gets hung on "Finding Module Dependencies"
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 15:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
> > > Is this another modem that does NAT on its own?
> >
> > No no, it's those cheap-o modem, a.k.a Win ADSL modem - totally dumb
> > thing;)
>
> Does that mean that the mo
> I'm simply thrilled to hear about your success. I've been struggling for a
> week now to get my Rotal ALE070 USB ADSL modem to work (obviously without
> success). Currently, my computer (Linux partition) will not boot at all if
> the modem is plugged in (it gets stuck at "Finding Module Dependenc
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Hetz Ben-Hamo wrote:
> > Is this another modem that does NAT on its own?
>
> No no, it's those cheap-o modem, a.k.a Win ADSL modem - totally dumb thing;)
>
Does that mean that the modem uses the hosting machine hardware for
tasks which more expensive
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 10:55, FW Admin wrote:
> Hello list,
>
>
> I have significant amount of the below messages in /var/log/messages for
> Bind:
>
> client 10.106.3.15#3771: updating zone 'xx.com/IN': update failed:
> 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSET)
Title: Strange Bind messages
Hello list,
I have significant amount of the below messages in /var/log/messages for Bind:
client 10.106.3.15#3771: updating zone 'xx.com/IN': update failed: 'RRset exists (value dependent)' prerequisite not satisfied (NXRRSET): 1 Time(s)
All the clients
> Huh? That makes no sense. If it works, it's probably because it's
> using one of the "generic" modules supplied with the kernel. Could you
> find out which? I'm willing to bet that UML doesn't have anything to
> do with it in this case.
it's uploading some .bin file into the modem, resets the mo
Hetz wrote:
> > Surprisingly, at the moment you don't need any additional kernel modules which
> > are outside the kernel, so I think SuSE, Red Hat, Mandrake prebuilt kernel
> > should do the trick and the modem is using some UML (user mode Linux) tricks
> > to make it work.
Huh? That makes no s
Hez,
I would be glad to host these file along with the adsl-howto.
that will be in
http://damyen.technion.ac.il/~dani
Dani
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi People,
>
> I have been asked by Rotal Management to support their ALE070 USB modem (the
> blue modem)..
>
> After 3 hours of
21 matches
Mail list logo
