Since receiving double postings is somewhat annoying, are there any guide
lines about double posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
If it was up to me then I would accept such double posts until most of us will
learn by experience when to double post (perhaps not at all) and when t
As far as I know new kernels does not write the correct time to the bios clock
every 11 min even if the system has a good time reference (ntp or such). This
is contrary to what older kernels used to do.
Can someone give a good reference to prove whether I am right or wrong?
I tried the kernel do
Actually, to turn color off _completely_
in RH6.1 boot sequence,
you also need to comment out the relevant
2 lines in
>/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit
=
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word "unsubscribe" in the mess
We are trying to put together a new Linux system with a CD-RW (Multi) on
it. However, the various suppliers have a dearth of information about
the CD-RW's imported to Israel.
It goes something like this:
We have the HP 9210i, which is the best around, but we don't know what
MMC compatibility is. A
Yaacov Fenster - System Engineering Troubleshooting and other miracles
wrote:
>
> We are trying to put together a new Linux system with a CD-RW (Multi) on
> it. However, the various suppliers have a dearth of information about
> the CD-RW's imported to Israel.
If it wasn't obvious, the followi
guy keren wrote:
>
[my original ramblings snipped]
>
> omer, you need to make one major distinction here between suggestions to
> programmers and suggestions to systems administrators.
Guy, I have no clue how you dragged programmers into it.
If a program knows to multiplex or not is really not
Is there any1 one here, better in Rehovot area, who has Suse 6.3 the
original (not the ISO from linuxberg) and can make me a copy?
--
Noam Meltzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 4853872
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
|now, if you wish to show us of a pop server that works in a multiplexing
|manner, and can actually scale up to supporting many clients - _that_
|would be a good contribution to our knowledge. i personally will be happy
|to know that. please tell us, and let us see the light :)
Are you sure it wil
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
> I won't be correcting you in regards to qpopper (I don't know
> it), but it's a well-established practice that you should not
> run heavily used services out of inetd, as it likes to barf
> at high loads (esentiallycutting off all the services running
> f
Getting kind of OT here, so in short...
I won't be correcting you in regards to qpopper (I don't know
it), but it's a well-established practice that you should not
run heavily used services out of inetd, as it likes to barf
at high loads (esentially cutting off all the services running
from withi
Correct me if I wrong, but qpopper works only with inetd and it is single
thread program so even it was compiled without inetd it would fork for
each request
Leonid Igolnik aka LiM
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Omer Efraim wrote:
|Actually, my reasoning against using this method
|on a loaded machine i
Actually, my reasoning against using this method
on a loaded machine is not due to any problem with tcpd,
but rather with inetd. Linking qpopper against libwrap
and using tcp wrappers that way is just fine even for
loaded machines, but inetd is just too costly in these
situations (forking a comple
|I have never used qpopper, and therefore do not know
|if it has built-in support for tcp wrappers, but you
|if performence is not that much of an issue (i.e., this
|is not a machine servicing thousands of users per minute),
Actually even if your machine is "servicing thousands" I still would
sugg
I have never used qpopper, and therefore do not know
if it has built-in support for tcp wrappers, but you
if performence is not that much of an issue (i.e., this
is not a machine servicing thousands of users per minute),
just stick it in inetd and launch thru tcpd.
Aviram Jenik wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
Hi, Shaul Karl!
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 06:02:17PM +0200, you wrote the following:
> > How can I run qpopper through tcp wrappers?
>
> Can someone post a short explanation about what tcp wrappers are?
It's a mechanism to allow/deny access to a network service (TCP or
UDP) based on the IP that
The tcp wrapper software's function is to provide application-indipendent
access control to inetd-based servers. If you look at /etc/inetd.conf you
can see something like this:
ftp stream tcp nowait root/usr/libexec/tcpd ftpd -A -l
telnet stream tcp nowait root/usr/l
> Hi.
>
> How can I run qpopper through tcp wrappers?
Can someone post a short explanation about what tcp wrappers are?
Thank you.
> Does it require a recompilation of qpopper?
>
> Thanks.
>
I believe that as this list agreed upon on the past, such messages are
regarded on topic and can be posted here.
Hey Gang,
Sorry if this is considered as spam, but I tried sending mail to the list
administrators (As Ira Abramov suggested - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and got a
notice that there's no s
Hey,
i've heard theres gonna be a W2K and Linux comparison
in the upcomming Internet World (i mean the israeli one) exhabition
and then i thought...
are we gonna have a linux booth? and is someone gonna bring some
free linux discs we can give to ppl? (i can give them... and im sure many
others
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 11:41:38AM +0200, Chen Shapira wrote:
> Esteemed IGLU members,
>
> For the past month people have been discussing the state of our website. The
> good people of IGLU were suggesting improvements, writing alternative pages
> and complaining.
Well, that is too what I've hea
Hi.
How can I run qpopper through tcp wrappers?
Does it require a recompilation of qpopper?
Thanks.
-
Aviram Jenik
"Addicted to Chaos"
-
Today's quote:
Success always necessitates a degree of ruthlessness.
Given the choice of friendship or succ
Hey Gang,
Sorry if this is considered as spam, but I tried sending mail to the list
administrators (As Ira Abramov suggested - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and got a
notice that there's no such mailbox.
I would like to point out that this is a *real* job advertisement, and no
attempt at spam whatsoever.
22 matches
Mail list logo
