On 12/7/23 00:16, justinst...@google.com wrote:
Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
ethtool_puts() would suffice.
The two cases are:
1) Use ethtool_sprintf() with just two arguments:
| ethtool_sprintf(&data, driver[i].name);
or
2) Use ethtool_sprintf() with a stan
> -Original Message-
> From: justinst...@google.com
> Sent: 2023年12月7日 7:16
> To: David S. Miller ; Eric Dumazet
> ; Jakub Kicinski ; Paolo Abeni
> ; Shay Agroskin ; Arthur
> Kiyanovski ; David Arinzon
> ; Noam Dagan ; Saeed
> Bishara ; Rasesh Mody ;
> Sudarsana Kalluru ; gr-linux-nic-...@
On 12/7/23 00:16, justinst...@google.com wrote:
Use strscpy() to implement ethtool_puts().
Functionally the same as ethtool_sprintf() when it's used with two
arguments or with just "%s" format specifier.
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt
---
include/linux/ethtool.h | 13 +
net/ethtool
This patch converts some basic cases of ethtool_sprintf() to
ethtool_puts().
The conversions are used in cases where ethtool_sprintf() was being used
with just two arguments:
| ethtool_sprintf(&data, buffer[i].name);
or when it's used with format string: "%s"
| ethtool_sprintf(&data, "
Add some warnings for using ethtool_sprintf() where a simple
ethtool_puts() would suffice.
The two cases are:
1) Use ethtool_sprintf() with just two arguments:
| ethtool_sprintf(&data, driver[i].name);
or
2) Use ethtool_sprintf() with a standalone "%s" fmt string:
| ethtool_sprintf(&d
Use strscpy() to implement ethtool_puts().
Functionally the same as ethtool_sprintf() when it's used with two
arguments or with just "%s" format specifier.
Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt
---
include/linux/ethtool.h | 13 +
net/ethtool/ioctl.c | 7 +++
2 files changed, 20 inser
Hi,
This series aims to implement ethtool_puts() and send out a wave 1 of
conversions from ethtool_sprintf(). There's also a checkpatch patch
included to check for the cases listed below.
This was sparked from recent discussion here [1]
The conversions are used in cases where ethtool_sprintf() w
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 06:49:11PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> On 05/12/2023 11:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:07:38PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
> >> On 04/12/2023 10:17, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> Check for additional CPUID bits to identify TDX guests
On 05/12/2023 14:26, Huang, Kai wrote:
>>
>
> Hm. Okay.
>
> Can we take a step back? What is bigger picture here? What enlightenment
> do you expect from the guest when everything is in-place?
>
All the functional enlightenment are already in place in the kernel an
On 05/12/2023 11:54, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:07:38PM +0100, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 04/12/2023 10:17, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
Check for additional CPUID bits to identify TDX guests running with Trust
Domain (TD) partitioning enabled. TD partitioning i
10 matches
Mail list logo
