On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 09:46:35AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This also misses the include/linux/atomic/atomic-arch-fallback.h
> implementations. Those are generated from the scripts/atomic/fallbacks/*
> templates, and you'll need to adjust at least fetch_add_unless and
> inc_unless_negative. As
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 09:46:35AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> With that in mind, I note that this patch primarily modifies addition
> operations, but leaves subtraction operations unchanged (even though those
> permit the value to go below the minimum, or above the maximum if a negative
> value i
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:26:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Kees,
> In our continuing effort to eliminate root causes of flaws in the kernel,
> this series is the start to providing a way to have sensible coverage
> for catching unexpected arithmetic wrap-around.
>
> A quick word on lang
On January 22, 2024 6:22:13 PM PST, Kent Overstreet
wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:26:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> In our continuing effort to eliminate root causes of flaws in the kernel,
>> this series is the start to providing a way to have sensible coverage
>> for catching unexpecte
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:26:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our continuing effort to eliminate root causes of flaws in the kernel,
> this series is the start to providing a way to have sensible coverage
> for catching unexpected arithmetic wrap-around.
>
> A quick word on language: wh
Hi,
In our continuing effort to eliminate root causes of flaws in the kernel,
this series is the start to providing a way to have sensible coverage
for catching unexpected arithmetic wrap-around.
A quick word on language: while discussing[1] the finer details of
the C standard's view on arithmeti
