Hello list,
what is the current status/best practise for ipvsadm with ldirectord?
should ipvsadm --both defined as a clone resource?
which constraints or order should be taken?
currently I only run ldirectord on the active VIP.
I want to use LVS with DR.
Thanks for your reply in advance.
Tom.
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 10:19:08 schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
> Hello list,
>
> what is the current status/best practise for ipvsadm with ldirectord?
>
> should ipvsadm --both defined as a clone resource?
> which constraints or order should be taken?
> currently I only run ldirectord on the a
> I have ipvsadm replication started by the init system and ldirectord
> managed
> by the cluster (pacemaker). Works like a charm.
>
> Michael.
Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf.
So my ipvsadm.rules are currently empty.
which are the minimum ipvsadm.rules to w
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 10:34:17 schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
> > I have ipvsadm replication started by the init system and ldirectord
> > managed
> > by the cluster (pacemaker). Works like a charm.
> >
> > Michael.
>
> Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf.
> So
>> Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf.
>> So my ipvsadm.rules are currently empty.
>> which are the minimum ipvsadm.rules to work in your charming setup?
>> e.g. for 3 or 4 nodes?
>>
>> Thanks for your reply!
>>
>> Tom.
>
> Don't know. Rules are controlled by ldir
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 11:13:41 schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
> >> Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf.
> >> So my ipvsadm.rules are currently empty.
> >> which are the minimum ipvsadm.rules to work in your charming setup?
> >> e.g. for 3 or 4 nodes?
> >>
> >>
Am 25.02.10 11:13, schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
>
>>> Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf.
>>> So my ipvsadm.rules are currently empty.
>>> which are the minimum ipvsadm.rules to work in your charming setup?
>>> e.g. for 3 or 4 nodes?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply!
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Malte Geierhos
Sent: 25 February 2010 10:18
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] ipvssync/ldirectord
Am 25.02.10 11:13, schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
>
>> Does this mean - it doesnt matter what is in the ipvsadm.rules?
>> It just needs to have the ipvsadm started ?
>
> ipvsadm is responsible for the state sync.
> ldirectord for the rules.
So -- if i have a init script, which does a
ipvsadm --start-daemon=master --syncid=254 --mcast-interface=e
Hi there, I have a config setup in Ubuntu 9.10 with Pacemaker 1.0.5 here
it is
node $id="76df8738-d836-4a95-afe3-732bc5cc7b66" ewadata2 \
attributes standby="off"
node $id="fd56770d-eef2-47e5-97aa-813ae1e71d7f" ewadata1 \
attributes standby="off"
primitive IP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr \
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 11:37:24 schrieb bi...@antworte.me:
> >> Does this mean - it doesnt matter what is in the ipvsadm.rules?
> >> It just needs to have the ipvsadm started ?
> >
> > ipvsadm is responsible for the state sync.
> > ldirectord for the rules.
>
> So -- if i have a init scrip
Am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2010 11:54:57 schrieb Frank Lazzarini:
> Hi there, I have a config setup in Ubuntu 9.10 with Pacemaker 1.0.5 here
> it is
>
> node $id="76df8738-d836-4a95-afe3-732bc5cc7b66" ewadata2 \
> attributes standby="off"
> node $id="fd56770d-eef2-47e5-97aa-813ae1e71d7f" ewada
Hi, i want to edit a resource listed by crm configure show via
batch/cmdline.
current:
group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2
should be changed to:
group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2 vip_3
I tried
echo "group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2 vip_3" | crm configure
edit gp_LVS
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:45:23PM +0100, bi...@antworte.me wrote:
>
> Hi, i want to edit a resource listed by crm configure show via
> batch/cmdline.
>
> current:
>
> group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2
>
> should be changed to:
>
> group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2 vip_3
>
On 2010-02-25 14:01, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> This should do:
>
> cat < delete loadbalancer
> group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2 vip_3
> EOF
You will also need to insert "commit" before EOF. And of course, no need
for cat, "crm configure <".
Cheers,
Florian
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:45:16AM -0800, Bob Schatz wrote:
> Dejan,
>
>
> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>
> Comments inline with [BS] and questions with "QUESTION #"
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Dejan Muhamedagic
> To: General Linux-HA maili
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:17:32PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:
> On 2010-02-25 14:01, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > This should do:
> >
> > cat < > delete loadbalancer
> > group loadbalancer ldirectord vip_1 vip_2 vip_3
> > EOF
>
> You will also need to insert "commit" before EOF. And of course, no
Thanks a bunch Michael,
I want to share my current config ... which is working just perfectly like I
wanted it to .. with everyonemaybe it helps someone. :)
(note my uuids changed since my last post, and cli-prefer-clustergroup was
created automatically when I created the group)
node $id="3e
Hi Dejan,
Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Helmut Weymann wrote:
> > Hi Dejan,
> >
> > many thanks for your comments.
> >
> > I have no idea about the programming standards the linux-ha project uses.
> > I am just a simple
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 schrieb Helmut Weymann:
> Hi Dejan,
>
> Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:13:19PM +0100, Helmut Weymann wrote:
> > > Hi Dejan,
> > >
> > > many thanks for your comments.
> > >
> > > I have no idea about t
20 matches
Mail list logo
