-----Original Message----- From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Malte Geierhos Sent: 25 February 2010 10:18 To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] ipvssync/ldirectord
Am 25.02.10 11:13, schrieb bi...@antworte.me: > >>> Sounds good. IMHO the ipvsadm rules are controlled by ldirectord.cf. >>> So my ipvsadm.rules are currently empty. >>> which are the minimum ipvsadm.rules to work in your charming setup? >>> e.g. for 3 or 4 nodes? >>> >>> Thanks for your reply! >>> >>> Tom. >>> >> Don't know. Rules are controlled by ldirectord. So I don't deal with the >> rules >> direct. >> >> Minimum needed: One virtual server and at least one real server. >> Maximum: Lots! >> > Does this mean - it doesnt matter what is in the ipvsadm.rules? > It just needs to have the ipvsadm started ? Yes, this is exactly what it means, ipvsadm rules are controlled via ldirectord in most cases. Most people which to have their ressources actively monitored and reacted on failed hosts / services . So ldirectord enables / disables hosts / services according to the configured test rule(s). ipvsadm.rules was meant to have static rules reloaded on reboot - without something else controlling them. kind regards, Malte Geierhos ---------------------- Previously I didn't have ipvsadm chkconfig'd on, ldirectord just loaded rules itself. Now I have the ipvsadm init script start on boot, just so it loads the ipvsadm.rules so I can run the sync daemon. - Darren _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
