Hi,
> Hi,
>
> Attached please find the debug fai.log from a failed attempt using
> setup-storage using a simple machine with two IDE drives, hoping to setup
> software raid. The logs indicate that everything seems to be working well,
> assigning the appropriate /dev/md number to the proper /de
[...]
>
> > Then, shouldn't setup-storage ignore errors and problems on disks that
> > should not be changed, aren't even mentioned in the setup storage
> > config file?
> > Is that possible, or does parted always try to analyze(or whatever)
> > all disks attached to the system, and in this case,
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Could one get any information how the disk label on the SAN was created?
>
> In case that is not known anymore - is there a command with which that
> can be checked, so we can send you the output?
>
I think the questi
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> Could one get any information how the disk label on the SAN was created?
In case that is not known anymore - is there a command with which that
can be checked, so we can send you the output?
Henning
--
Henning Sprang
http:/
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > Could one get any information how the disk label on the SAN was created?
>
> I'll try to get tha info as well as the parted version. It might a
> somewhat older version, as a mirror was used with Lenny, but not
> update
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> [...]
>
> Could one get any information how the disk label on the SAN was created?
I'll try to get tha info as well as the parted version. It might a
somewhat older version, as a mirror was used with Lenny, but not
updated to the newest
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:21:07PM +0100, Henning Sprang wrote:
> > And I can't try things (myself) - it was a customer system to which I
> > have no access anymore and won't too soon as it was only a one-time
> > Job.
> > I only have the full FAI logs of the host.
> > But probably they will find
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:21:07PM +0100, Henning Sprang wrote:
> And I can't try things (myself) - it was a customer system to which I
> have no access anymore and won't too soon as it was only a one-time
> Job.
> I only have the full FAI logs of the host.
> But probably they will find time to try
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Can you try that (if you are using xen)
No for both:
It wasn't Xen, but some "normal" HP Server. The special thing with the
system was a SAN that was attached - but actually we din't want to
touch the disks on the SAN, only install the syste
Hello Henning,
Quoting "Henning Sprang" :
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
Should I move this to the parted list?
Sorry for not being able to say anything about this, I've been very
busy and did not do anything with FAI the last months.
Now that I do some things wi
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Should I move this to the parted list?
Sorry for not being able to say anything about this, I've been very
busy and did not do anything with FAI the last months.
Now that I do some things with it again, it took me only 2 days until
I st
Citeren Rudy Gevaert :
partitioning inside dom-U.
I don't understand why this worked with my old fai
(setup_harddisks). And with setup-storage it doesn't.
I used this FAI setup, but configured it to use the old syntax of
setup_harddisks. Now it works...:
Partitioning local harddis
Hi Michael,
Citeren Michael Tautschnig :
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Michael,
I've been away, so I'm not back to follow up on this.
Quoting Michael Tautschnig :
>Could you do another run and run pa
> Hello Michael,
>
> I've been away, so I'm not back to follow up on this.
>
> Quoting Michael Tautschnig :
>
> >Could you do another run and run parted manually from the shell
> >you should get
> >dropped into? Like so:
> >
> >parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print (should produce said error)
> >par
Hello Michael,
I've been away, so I'm not back to follow up on this.
Quoting Michael Tautschnig :
Could you do another run and run parted manually from the shell you
should get
dropped into? Like so:
parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print (should produce said error)
parted -s /dev/sda mklabel ms
Hi Rudy,
sorry for the late reply.
[...]
>
> >I'm not entirely sure about this, but maybe this is a new error message that
> >parted prints if the disk does not contain a disk label (i.e., is
> >brand-new or
> >had been zeroed) or some disklabel that parted doesn't understand.
> >Could that be
Hi Michael,
Quoting Michael Tautschnig :
I'm not entirely sure about this, but maybe this is a new error message that
parted prints if the disk does not contain a disk label (i.e., is
brand-new or
had been zeroed) or some disklabel that parted doesn't understand.
Could that be
the case or
Hi Rudy,
[...]
>
> Partitioning local harddisks using setup-storage
> Starting setup-storage 1.2+exp
> disklist was: sda
> Using config file: /var/lib/fai/config/disk_config/SHIBBOLETH_IDP
> Input was:
> disk_config disk1 fstabkey:label bootable:1
> primary /boot 200 ext3rw creat
Citeren Thomas Lange :
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:18:36 +0100, Rudy Gevaert
said:
> INTERNAL ERROR in setup-storage:
> Table header not seen yet
> Please report this error to the Debian Bug Tracking System.
> (STDOUT) Error: Error initialising SCSI device /dev/sda -
Invalid ar
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:18:36 +0100, Rudy Gevaert
> said:
> INTERNAL ERROR in setup-storage:
> Table header not seen yet
> Please report this error to the Debian Bug Tracking System.
> (STDOUT) Error: Error initialising SCSI device /dev/sda - Invalid argument
> Start
Hello,
I'm trying to install with FAI a virtual xen machine. I'm exporting
in dom0 an lvm volume.
debug=1 is set.
Any idea what is wrong?
Thanks in advance,
Rudy
...
Performing FAI installation. All data may be overwritten!
^G^G^G
Calling task_install
Calling task_partition
Partitioning
Sorry for this full-quote; I think it might be useful if you could add your
information to the bug reported as #404927 (http://bugs.debian.org/404927) for
udev people to work around this or kernel folks fix this.
Best,
Michael
[...]
>
> I get the same problem here on an IBM 3950, my sda device
Le vendredi 15 mai 2009 à 14:13 +0200, Thomas Lange a écrit :
> > On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:48:17 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> > said:
>
> > Hi!
> >> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my
> case it is:
> >> > # ls -al /dev/sda
> >> > brw-rw 1 roo
Hi!
> If the ouput of
> bash -x /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
> is ok, I would guess it's because of the wrong group floppy.
> Check why your disk belongs to the group floppy. Maybe a
> broken udev configuration.
Debian Bug #404927 looks promising:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=404927
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 16:02:49 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
>> What does cat /proc/partitions say?
> # cat /proc/partitions
> major minor #blocks name
>8 0 143247360 sda
Looks fine.
If the ouput of
bash -x /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
is ok, I would guess it's bec
Hi again!
> >> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my
> case it is:
> >> > # ls -al /dev/sda
> >> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> > dmesg.log: http://paste.debian.net/36208/
> Your dmesg looks fine. One disk, called sda. So i
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:48:17 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
> Hi!
>> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case
it is:
>> > # ls -al /dev/sda
>> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> dmesg.log: http://paste.debian.n
Hi!
> > So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case
> it is:
> > # ls -al /dev/sda
> > brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
> Strange. please put your dmesg.log, fai.log and variables.log onto
> paste.debian.net. Then We may find the problem.
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 13:20:20 +0200, Alexander Bugl
> said:
> So disk-info tests if the group of /dev/sda is disk -- and in my case it
is:
> # ls -al /dev/sda
> brw-rw 1 root floppy 8, 0 May 15 10:36 /dev/sda
Strange. please put your dmesg.log, fai.log and variables.log
Hi!
>> So I think inside the NFSroot sda is visible without problems.
> I must agree, but will try again :-) . Can you run
> '/usr/lib/fai/disk-info' in your shell?
Yes, it produces no output. The reason seems to be:
# /usr/lib/fai/disk-info
[...]
stat -c %G /dev/$device
++ stat -c %G /dev/sda
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Oops, I 've missed this line in your former mail, disklist is not
supposed to be empty! Output should be at least "disklist was: sda".
It looks like the nfsroot doesn't see /dev/sda.
After the installation stops with the error, I have a shell on the still
running m
Hi!
>> disklist was:
> Oops, I 've missed this line in your former mail, disklist is not
> supposed to be empty! Output should be at least "disklist was: sda".
> It looks like the nfsroot doesn't see /dev/sda.
After the installation stops with the error, I have a shell on the still
running machi
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Tried that, after manually labeling the drive both "parted" commands
produced no errors, so I restarted the installation. But it still stops
with error:
++ debug=1
Calling task_install
Calling task_partition
Partitioning local harddisks using setup-storage
Starting set
Hi!
>>> Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
>>> used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
>>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
>>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
>> Both produce the same result:
>> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
>>
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Hi Nicolas!
Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
# parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
# parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
Both produce the same result:
# parted -s /d
Hi Nicolas!
> Could you post the result of the following commands, they are the ones
> used by setup-storage to find the disk configuration:
> # parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
> # parted -s /dev/sda unit chs print free
Both produce the same result:
# parted -s /dev/sda unit TiB print
Error:
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
thanks for your reply.
disk_config sda disklabel:msdos
primary / 12G ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro
primary swap4G swap rw
logical /tmp2G ext3 rw createopts="-m 1"
logical /var
Hi Nicolas,
thanks for your reply.
> > disk_config sda disklabel:msdos
> >
> > primary / 12G ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro
> > primary swap4G swap rw
> > logical /tmp2G ext3 rw createopts="-m 1"
> > logical /var50G-
Alexander Bugl a écrit :
[...]
disk_config sda disklabel:msdos
primary / 12G ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro
primary swap4G swap rw
logical /tmp2G ext3 rw createopts="-m 1"
logical /var50G-ext3 rw createopt
Hi all,
I am new to setup-storge, and on my second test machine I ran into an error:
-
Fully Automatic Installation - FAI
FAI 3.2.20, 04 May 2009 Copyright (c) 1999-2009
Thomas Lange
40 matches
Mail list logo
