Hi, Anson,
We're missing ACK from the maintainers for patch 4/5 and 5/5, if we
want to shipped the patch via thermal tree.
For patch 2/5, as it introduces a new API for OF_THERMAL, I'd like to
get Eduardo' feedback before taking them.
thanks,
rui
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 03:16 +, Anson Huang w
s is not linked
> to
> the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Acked-by: Zhang Rui
should I apply this patch or you have a separate tree for all these
changes?
thanks,
rui
> ---
> ...pu-cooling-api.txt => cpu-cooling
On 二, 2019-06-25 at 10:53 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:40:11 +0800
> Zhang Rui escreveu:
>
> >
> > On 二, 2019-06-18 at 18:05 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > >
> > > Rename the thermal documentation files to ReST, ad
Hi, Viresh,
I will queue it for 4.17, with just one minor fix below.
On 二, 2018-01-16 at 15:22 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This extends the sysfs interface for thermal cooling devices and
> exposes
> some pretty useful statistics. These statistics have proven to be
> quite
> useful specially whi
On 二, 2018-03-13 at 15:02 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Hi, Viresh,
>
> I will queue it for 4.17, with just one minor fix below.
>
I got the following warning from checkpatch.pl
---
WARNING: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol
fully
#147: FILE: dri
On 二, 2018-03-20 at 09:38 +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-03-18, 13:44, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > I got those warnings as well, and I quietly ignored them :)
> >
> > I ignored the renaming part for the sake of consistency. The other
> > existing
> > routines for similar purpose are named as:
On 三, 2018-11-07 at 18:09 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch set adds a new flag and mechanism in thermal trip points
> in
> DT. The old implementation in thermal zone in DT sets the same
> configuration for all internal trip points. It does not work for all
> HW. There are SoCs
an be confussing
> and 'passive' (whic is passive cooling) might be interpretted
> wrongly.
>
> This mechanism prevents from missue and adds explicit setting
> for hardware which support interrupts for pre-configured temperature
> threshold.
>
> Cc: Zhang Rui
>
Hi, Lukasz,
On 四, 2018-12-06 at 20:55 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>
> On 12/6/18 8:18 PM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rui,
> >
> > On 12/5/18 4:09 PM, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > >
> > > On 三, 2018-11-07 at 18:09 +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> >
On 一, 2018-04-23 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin DuBois wrote:
> The current implementation casted away its sign.
> It was also using '0' to disable emulation, but 0C is a valid
> thermal reading. A large negative value (below absolute zero) now
> disables the emulation.
Makes sense to me.
>
> Test: Build
cause the trip points
> to be updated again.
>
> If .set_trips is not implemented, the framework behaves as before.
>
> This patch is based on an earlier version from Mikko Perttunen
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang
> Cc: Zhang Rui
> Cc:
On 二, 2016-06-21 at 09:42 +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> Do you have other ideas for the following patches? :-)
> Even if only took two weeks feel after a long time.
>
> 9157919 New [v5,1/5] thermal: Add support for hardware-
> tracked trip points
> 9157917 New [v5,2/5] thermal: of
12 matches
Mail list logo
