On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 07:48:31PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi Darrick,
>
> I don't see patch 2/2 anywhere (my inbox, email archives)...
Probably because it's moving a lot of files around, so the diffs were 276k.
>
> --
> ~Randy
On 10/5/18 8:22 AM, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 07:48:31PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> Hi Darrick,
>>
>> I don't see patch 2/2 anywhere (my inbox, email archives)...
>
> Probably because it's moving a lot of files around, so the diffs were 276k.
Oh, yeah. Thanks.
--
~Ra
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:59:44PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong
>
> Move the ext4 data structures book to Documentation/filesystems/ext4/
> since the administrative information moved elsewhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong
Thanks, applied and pushed out to the ex
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 06:06:03PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So my eyesight still hasn't fully recovered, so in the meantime it's
> been difficult to read the online documentation. Here's some stylesheet
> overrides I've been using to make it easier for me to read them:
> https://dj
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:18:11PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This series converts the existing in-kernel xfs documentation to rst
> format, links it in with the rest of the kernel's rst documetation, and
> then begins pulling in the contents of the Data Structures & Algorithms
>
On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
Dave Chinner wrote:
> Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> point - if it's OK I'll to pull this into the XFS tree for the 4.20
> merge window. If not, we'll go b
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:01:20PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:51:54 +1000
> Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > Can you let us know whether the CC-by-SA 4.0 license is acceptible
> > or not? That's really the only thing that we need clarified at this
> > point - if it's OK I'll t
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:25:51AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin
> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:25:54AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet
> Cc: Michal Hocko
> Cc: Andrew Morton
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin
> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:25:49AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:25:50AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin
> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Reviewed-by: Rashmica Gupta
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
sed on top of next-20181005):
https://github.com/ojeda/linux.git compiler-attributes-rebased
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
The following changes since commit 17b57b1883c1285f3d0dc2266e8f79286a7bef38:
Linux 4.19-rc6 (2018-09-30 07:15:35 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://
Arm v8 architecture supports multiple page sizes - 4k, 16k and
64k. Based on the active page size, the Linux port supports
corresponding hugepage sizes at PMD and PUD(4k only) levels.
In addition, the architecture also supports caching larger sized
ranges (composed of multiple entries) at the PTE
On 09/12/2018 01:35 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
> v3->v4:
> - Drop patch 4 as it is just a minor optimization.
> - Add a cc:stable tag to patch 1.
> - Clean up some comments in patch 3.
>
> v2->v3:
> - With confirmation that the dummy array in dentry_stat structure
> was never a replacemen
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 21:57 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:47AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > Indirect branch tracking provides an optional legacy code bitmap
> > that indicates locations of non-IBT compatible code. When set,
> > each bit in the bitmap represent
> On Oct 5, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 21:57 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:47AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>>> Indirect branch tracking provides an optional legacy code bitmap
>>> that indicates locations of non-IBT com
On Fri, 5 Oct 2018, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> > And a user would need to specify ALL lsms on the "lsm=" line?
> >
>
> Yes, the ones they want enabled.
If they're overriding the kconfig value.
--
James Morris
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:58 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 10:49 AM, James Morris wrote:
>> > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> Then someone boots the system with:
>> >>
>> >> selinux=1 security=selinux
>> >>
>> >> In what order
This adds the build infrastructure for checking DT binding schema
documents and validating dts files using the binding schema.
Check DT binding schema documents:
make dt_binding_check
Build dts files and check using DT binding schema:
make dtbs_check
Currently, the validation targets are separat
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 09:28 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Oct 5, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 21:57 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:47AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > > > Indirect branch tracking provides an o
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:03 AM Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 09:28 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Oct 5, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 21:57 +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 08:05:47AM -0700, Yu
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 10:07:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 10:03 AM Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 09:28 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > > On Oct 5, 2018, at 9:13 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 21:57 +0200, Eugen
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 18:05:22 -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Texas Instruments INA3221 is a triple-channel shunt and bus
> voltage monitor. This patch adds a DT binding doc for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen
> ---
> Changelog
> v7->v9:
> * N/A
> v6->v7:
> * Restored three channel examples and
Hi Paul,
Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and _sched
API references as is, since I don't think its a good idea to remove them till
the APIs themselves are removed, however I did remove seve
call_rcu_bh is now implemented in terms of call_rcu, so the suggestion
to use a different API for speed benefits is not accurate anymore.
Update the document accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 dele
RCU consolidation effort causes the update side of the RCU API to be
consistent across all the 3 RCU flavors (normal, sched, bh). Update the
full API in the whatisRCU document accordingly so we are encouraging
folks to use the consolidated API than using the ones for the individual
flavors (which i
It could be clarified better why rcu_read_lock_sched is better than
using preempt_disable, add the same.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.txt b/Documentation/
The checklist suggests rcu_barrier_bh for RCU-bh and similarly for
sched, however these APIs are now implemented as rcu_barrier itself due
to the RCU consolidation. It may also be removed in the future, so lets
correct the doc to encourage use of the rcu_barrier() API itself.
Similar changes are ma
Since the RCU mechanisms have been consolidated, this checklist item
seems no longer useful or relevant. Probably even a bit misleading. For
example, synchronize_rcu will now guarantee that all interrupt disabled
regions have finished executing. So lets remove this checklist item.
Signed-off-by: J
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>
> Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and _sched
> API references as is, since I don't think its a good idea to rem
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and _sched
> API references as is, since I don't think its a good
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >
> > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> > checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 05:13:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> > checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left severa
's.
>
> The conflicts are trivial to solve, but if you want a reference, take
> a look at (rebased on top of next-20181005):
>
> https://github.com/ojeda/linux.git compiler-attributes-rebased
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
>
> The following changes since
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >
> > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU and
> > checklists. Hopefully you agree with them. I left several old _bh and
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:45:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:45:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 07:46:28PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:09PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > >
> > > Here are this week's rcu doc updates based on combing through whatisRCU
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 08:45:40PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Shouldn't the synchronize_rcu() precede the loop doing the kfree()
> calls? Or am I missing something subtle?
No, that was a cut and paste error on my part. I was removing the
rcu_read_unlock() before the kfree loop, and acci
38 matches
Mail list logo
