ubject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] thunderbolt: Additional step for built-in module
> to
> power on
>
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:46:18PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> > Mika,
> >
> > I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 05:46:18PM +, mario.limoncie...@dell.com wrote:
> Mika,
>
> I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won't come
> in threaded right), but I
> was curious and reviewed it from the web:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg50034.html
>
Mika,
I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won't come
in threaded right), but I
was curious and reviewed it from the web:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg50034.html
Are you sure this is true? When I saw this I tried it myself and didn't find
the need fo
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:49:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The device will not appear until we rescan the bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
No, we definitely will not want to do anything like this. The controller
should appear without any action needed from user side.
--
To unsubsc
