Mika,

I'm not CC on patch 2/2 of this series (so apologies this probably won't come 
in threaded right), but I 
was curious and reviewed it from the web:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-doc/msg50034.html

Are you sure this is true?  When I saw this I tried it myself and didn't find 
the need for rescanning.
1) I compiled thunderbolt.ko into the kernel.
2) I compiled latest fwupd which contains both thunderbolt and  
thunderboltpower plugins.
3) Ran /usr/lib/fwupd/fwupd -v
4) Looked for thunderbolt and thunderboltpower related messages.

I saw that:
1) Thunderbolt Power was forced to 1
2) shortly later the thunderbolt uevent showed and device did enumerate in 
fwupd successfully.
3) Thunderbolt power was set to 0
4) Thunderbolt remove event showed up soon (fwupd ignores the remove when 
forcepowered though).

Is there something else needed to reproduce your behavior that prompted this 
doc change?

If there is a situation like this, it makes sense for fwupd to also do the 
rescan, but I would like to be able
to reproduce it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to