Re: [RFC v2 0/5] mm: introduce THP deferred setting

2025-02-17 Thread Nico Pache
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 7:54 AM Usama Arif wrote: > > > > On 11/02/2025 00:40, Nico Pache wrote: > > This series is a follow-up to [1], which adds mTHP support to khugepaged. > > mTHP khugepaged support was necessary for the global="defer" and > > mTHP="inherit" case (and others) to make sense. >

Re: [RFC v2 0/5] mm: introduce THP deferred setting

2025-02-17 Thread Usama Arif
On 11/02/2025 00:40, Nico Pache wrote: > This series is a follow-up to [1], which adds mTHP support to khugepaged. > mTHP khugepaged support was necessary for the global="defer" and > mTHP="inherit" case (and others) to make sense. > Hi Nico, Thanks for the patches! Why is mTHP khugepaged a

[RFC v2 0/5] mm: introduce THP deferred setting

2025-02-10 Thread Nico Pache
This series is a follow-up to [1], which adds mTHP support to khugepaged. mTHP khugepaged support was necessary for the global="defer" and mTHP="inherit" case (and others) to make sense. We've seen cases were customers switching from RHEL7 to RHEL8 see a significant increase in the memory footprin