Hello Stephen,
.
> > I think we should use parent device's node, not the paren node in DT,
> > right? But I agree, we should only look "one level up in the chain".
> Are these two things different? I'm suggesting looking at
> device_node::parent and trying to find a #clock-cells property.
I thoug
Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-12-03 23:13:15)
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:35:10PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > If the DT doesn't have the #clock-cells property in the node being
> > registered then calling clk_get() will fail for any consumer devices
> > that point to the node with a phandle
Hello Again Stephen,
I did already send v5 prior to your reply but I will create v6 today
based on this discussion.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:35:10PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-30 02:50:22)
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > Thanks a bunch for taking the time and revi
Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-30 02:50:22)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Thanks a bunch for taking the time and reviewing this!
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03:55:58)
> > > With MFD devices the clk properties may be contained
Hello Stephen & All,
I created v5 where I fixed obvious issues. I'll send it in few minutes.
Please note following topics:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:06:53AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > Hello Stephen,
> >
> > Thanks a bunch for taking the time and reviewing this!
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:50:22PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Hello Stephen,
>
> Thanks a bunch for taking the time and reviewing this!
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03:55:58)
> > > With MFD devices the clk propertie
Hello Stephen,
Thanks a bunch for taking the time and reviewing this!
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:54:10AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03:55:58)
> > With MFD devices the clk properties may be contained in MFD (parent) DT
> > node. Current devm_of_clk_add_hw_prov
Quoting Matti Vaittinen (2018-11-13 03:55:58)
> With MFD devices the clk properties may be contained in MFD (parent) DT
> node. Current devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider assumes the clk is bound to MFD
> subdevice not to MFD device (parent). Add
> devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider_parent to tackle this issue.
With MFD devices the clk properties may be contained in MFD (parent) DT
node. Current devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider assumes the clk is bound to MFD
subdevice not to MFD device (parent). Add
devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider_parent to tackle this issue.
Also clkdev registration lacks of managed registratio
10 matches
Mail list logo
