Hello Stephen,
.
> > I think we should use parent device's node, not the paren node in DT,
> > right? But I agree, we should only look "one level up in the chain".

> Are these two things different? I'm suggesting looking at
> device_node::parent and trying to find a #clock-cells property.

I thought that MFD sub-devices may completely lack the DT node but I will 
verify this tomorrow. BTW, I already did the patch version 6 which checks the 
dev->parent->of_node if #clock-cells is not found from device's own node or if 
own node is NULL.

Br. Matti Vaittinen 

Reply via email to