Re: [PATCH] hrtimers, timers: eliminate some jiffies-backed code

On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 19:40 +0400, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > This patch provides an attempt to get away from jiffies in msleep() > and msleep_interruptible() to hrtimers-backed usleep_range() and > usleep_range_interruptible(). Both of the latter now returns an amount > of microseconds really spent i

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > On 02/07/2012 11:43 PM, Andrew Richardson wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I'm experiencing what appears to be a minimum clock resolution issue in > > using clock_gettime() on a PandaBoard ES running ubuntu. > > > > *> uname -r* > >

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:21 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > On Feb 7, 2012, at 7:30 PM, John Stultz wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 00:16 +0100, Zygmunt Krynicki wrote: > > Hrm. No, that shouldn't be the case. CLOCK_MONOTONIC and > > CLOCK_REALTIME > > are driv

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 21:21 -0800, Dmitry Antipov wrote: > BTW, I have no ideas why clock_getres(CLOCK_REALTIME,...) returns {0, 1} > regardless of underlying clock source. I expect {0, 30517} for 32K timer > and {0, 26} for MPU timer. Yea. I had proposed to export the underlying clocksource's res

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 04:32 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > Ah, very interesting. > > dmesg | grep clock > [0.00] OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER1 at 32768 Hz > [0.00] sched_clock: 32 bits at 32kHz, resolution > 30517ns, wraps every 131071999ms Hr

Re: Minimum timing resolution in Ubuntu/Linaro on the PandaBoard ES

On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 04:32 -0500, Andrew Richardson wrote: > Ah, very interesting. > > dmesg | grep clock > [0.00] OMAP clockevent source: GPTIMER1 at 32768 Hz > [0.00] sched_clock: 32 bits at 32kHz, resolution > 30517ns, wraps every 131071999ms Hr

Re: Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 12.02 is available

On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 00:16 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > The tree is here: > git://git.linaro.org/people/ynk/linux-linaro-tracking.git > branch: linaro-android > tag: linux-linaro-3.3-rc3-2012.02-1-android-0 Zach, now that Andrey is running the kernel show, you might need to ge

Re: Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 12.02 is available

On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 17:19 -0600, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Paul, > > Would you get Andrey setup to push to android.git.linaro.org? > > We should name it > > kernel/kwg.git > > Sound good with everyone? Why not reuse the existing kernel/linaro-android.git ? thanks -john __

Re: Call for topics for the 12.03 release of linux-linaro kernel

On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 00:07 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > Greetings, > > I've pushed the baseline for the 12.03 linux-linaro kernel tree to > git://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git , linux-linaro branch. > > Currently this is v3.3-rc6 plus: > - 4 topics from the ARM LT > - few c

[RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this for 12.04, and doing so early so we can make sure that all the desired config options are present in

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 06:40 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote: I suspect we'll need an ubuntu specific fragment as well as all the other board fragments. The Ubuntu packaging scripts check that various config options are set, using these I have cr

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/27/2012 01:48 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote: Hi John, On 26 March 2012 20:20, John Stultz <mailto:john.stu...@linaro.org>> wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose merging this

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 06:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Sorry, there's a bug in the ubuntu config, CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR should be 32768, not 0. Thanks! I'll make sure that gets fixed. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 09:37 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/28/2012 10:17 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/27/2012 12:50 AM, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pa

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express [ was: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel]

On 03/29/2012 02:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:20 -0700, John Stultz wrote: So after talking about it at the last Linaro Connect, I've finally gotten around to making a first pass at providing config fragments for the linaro kernel. I'd like to propose me

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/28/2012 09:37 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: On 03/28/2012 10:17 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 03/28/2012 05:24 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: I have not validated the changes in android.conf, but by merging linaro-base.conf and origen.conf, I was able to boot my kernel the way I would have expected

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/29/2012 09:57 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: The new log messages are because of this config entry. CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y But the information is useful, hence better it stays that way. Yea. The lockdep output is super useful for catching really hard to trigger bugs. Take those warnings seri

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express [ was: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel]

On 03/30/2012 01:19 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 11:00 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/29/2012 02:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: John, I've attached a config fragment for Versatile Express. Great! I've merged that in! There's a few warnings though:

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 03/30/2012 10:07 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 09:33 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/30/2012 01:19 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: To do that the vexpress config fragment will need to be a topic branch on the ARM Landing Teams git, and every topic which changes a

Re: [RFC] First pass config fragment breakout for linaro kernel

On 03/30/2012 12:00 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Right, some of the config options should better move to the feature branches. I have cleaned up origen.conf so that we can now boot linux-linaro-tracking kernel till the console. Code dropped at [1]. With the help of a couple of patches[2], I was abl

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 10:15 -0700, John Stultz wrote: In that case, just go ahead and push the full config to the config tree. If we need to do have fullly-enabled vs upstream builds we can deal with the warnings in the latter case (or maybe

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 10:29 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:37 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: We almost certainly need board specific android and ubuntu fragments as well, so I'll add vexpress-android.conf and vexpress-ubuntu

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 06:58 AM, Andy Green wrote: On 04/02/2012 09:40 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 21:10 +0800, Andy Green wrote: If you want to do it with this complex directory scheme, please don't so anything to the definitive sources that makes it mandatory.

Re: Config fragment for Versatile Express

On 04/02/2012 11:58 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 11:18 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 04/02/2012 10:29 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 08:37 -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 03/31/2012 02:17 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: We almost certainly need board

qemu & hardware gfx acceleration

So the Google Android team just posted this: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/hsDu/~3/OCt1AQzfyWI/faster-emulator-with-better-hardware.html Which shows their device emulator running w/ hardware acceleration. Since I know they started with qemu, I was curious if there was any details as

Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1. You can grab it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase thanks -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists

Re: Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

On 04/09/2012 03:18 PM, John Stultz wrote: I went ahead and forward ported the AOSP-3.3 tree to 3.4-rc1. You can grab it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase Sigh. Looks like the Google devs are following close behind and released their own

3.4 based config-fragment tree for 12.04

Hey Andrey, I rebased the config-fragment tree to 3.4-rc2, and you can find it here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-configs-3.4 Let me know if you run into any issues. thanks -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@

Re: Linaro 12.04 3.4-rc1 based androidization branch is available

On 04/13/2012 03:22 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Hi John When using the linaro-android-3.4 branch the mouse buttons don't seem to work. I've tracked the problem down to something you fixed in linaro-android-3.4-jstultz-rebase, namely: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/android.git;a

Re: Fix for Ubuntu networking [Re: Preliminary 12.04 linux-linaro kernel tree]

On 04/19/2012 04:03 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 11:17 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 10:22 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 00:22 +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, I updated (overwrote) the current linux-linaro t

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 04/24/2012 08:24 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 04/25/2012 11:12 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: We're still undergoing uplevel on tilt-tracking and didn't get back to tilt-3.3 functionality yet (OMAP4 boot is busted, although hopefully we have a fix for that today), so I put off th

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

merge conflicts; guess later today. Is the resolution simple enough? Otherwise, feels that the better scalable approach is that the topic owner (e.g. John Stultz for the time being) gets notified and asked to fix the merge conflict on his side. Your daily merge scripts would then pick it up automati

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

On 05/03/2012 09:16 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: On 05/03/2012 08:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: So Andrey mailed me that there was a conflict between Linus' v3.4-rc5 and the Android tree, but when I went to updated the tree sort it out, v.3.4-rc5 merged in without any issues. I suspec

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created / update frequency

On 05/03/2012 09:31 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:10 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 05/03/2012 07:15 AM, Alexander Sack wrote: On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Sorry for the delay. I've updated the linux-linaro-core-tracking, but it curr

Re: linux-linaro-core-tracking tree created

On 05/07/2012 02:09 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: 07.05.2012 09:05, Andy Green написал: Since it's still there in today's llct and making me see double, I tracked it down to this from Androidization series 109a3af ARM: Make low-level printk work Author: Tony Lindgren Date: Mon May 9 14:10:26

android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds some items like earlysuspend and classic wakelocks in order to provide better compatibility with old (and by old, I really mean

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/18/2012 06:57 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote: On 17 May 2012 22:09, Zach Pfeffer wrote: On 17 May 2012 20:49, John Stultz wrote: Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tr

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/21/2012 03:27 AM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote: hi, On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andy Green > wrote: So I just wanted to check first with folks to make sure there are no objections to merging in the -compat changes, and that the

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/17/2012 09:00 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 18/05/12 09:49, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Hey Andrey, Zach, So I'm back from my vacation, and have found that the Android team has released a -compat tree for their 3.4 kernel. Basically this tree re-adds some items like earlysuspend

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/21/2012 09:21 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 22/05/12 01:58, Somebody in the thread at some point said: On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:33:47AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: like Andy, I am a bit concerned that we merge the android stuff into the linaro-core and that we get android candies in 'va

Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hsmmc: probe of omap_hsmmc.0 failed with error -22 With

Re: android-3.4 or android-3.4-compat

On 05/23/2012 05:25 PM, Andy Green wrote: On 24/05/12 06:42, Somebody in the thread at some point said: Am I right in thinking the issue you're running into here is that your customer has direct expectations for the tree you're maintaining, which makes adding unexpected instability on a vanilla

Re: Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot fails after not finding the root device. Looking at the boot log I'm seeing: omap_hs

Re: Panda mmc issue w/ Linus' current 3.5-rc tree

On 05/24/2012 06:27 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thursday 24 May 2012, John Stultz wrote: On 05/23/2012 05:05 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, So it looks like something has gone awry in the 3.5 pull with Panda's mmc functionality. Trying to boot the current 3.5-rc tree, the boot

Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HDMI failure I'm seeing w/ the current 3.5-rc with my Panda Board. [2.973693] omapdss error: HPD IRQ request failed [2.978759] omapdss HDMI error: failed to power o

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 05/25/2012 07:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 19:49 +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HD

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 05/25/2012 07:24 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 19:49 +0530, S, Venkatraman wrote: On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, John Stultz wrote: Hey Arnd, Rob, So after Arnd's help sorting a workaround for the mmc driver, I'm now trying to sort out the following HD

Re: Panda HDMI issue w/ 3.5-rc?

On 06/01/2012 06:18 PM, S, Venkatraman wrote: If it helps, I am forwarding Tomi's pull request to Florian for 3.5 merge window. I haven't checked very closely, but looks like the fixes are in that pull request. Thanks so much! -john ___ linaro-dev m

Re: Are we going to start using config fragments?

On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: Are we going to start using the config fragments we created a while ago? (Or did we not reach consensus on that?) I wouldn't say there was a strong consensus. But I think we should push to make it available at an infrastructure level so those w

Re: Are we going to start using config fragments?

On 06/07/2012 12:45 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 06/06/2012 07:09 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: I have attached a couple of patches for the config fragments (3.5 removed the PERF_COUNTERS config). Thanks, I'll create a new branch for 3.5 and merge your changes, so they don't get lost

Re: Git repo for kernel config fragments created

On 06/11/2012 06:14 AM, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: I have created an git repo for the kernel config fragments we produced a while ago, this is at git://git.linaro.org/kernel/configs.git The config-core-tracking branch in this repo is intended to be added to the linux-linaro-core-tracking branch

Re: android-3.4 ... / Audit of OOT android code

On 06/10/2012 02:53 AM, Andy Green wrote: On 05/24/2012 11:06 PM, the mail apparently from Andy Green included: Putting it another way if Linaro isn't going to take even a modest amount of care about the OOT Android content making problems in vanilla case, we probably aren't ready to add this l

Mumble server having issues?

So I've been having trouble with the mumble server and the behavior is odd enough that I don't think its a problem just on my end. I'm seeing cases where: * Only one of two members in a room can hear me talk * One member could hear both parties talking * I can't hear either of them talk As well

Re: Call for topic updates and new topics for linux-linaro-core-tracking tree

On 08/10/2012 11:57 AM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: Greetings, The linux-linaro-core-tracking tree (llct, see http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-tracking.git;a=summary for some more details) is planned to be moved to v3.6-rc1 (or v3.6-rc2 if it is out) early next week. There wil

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

appears between v3.5 and v3.6-rc1. It is not easy to reproduce but after taking some time to dig, it seems to appear with this commit: 1e75fa8be9fb61e1af46b5b3b176347a4c958ca1 is the first bad commit commit 1e75fa8be9fb61e1af46b5b3b176347a4c958ca1 Author: John Stultz Date: Fri Jul 13 01:21:53 2012

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/07/2012 02:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/07/2012 07:22 PM, John Stultz wrote: On 09/07/2012 07:20 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/06/2012 11:18 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/06/2012 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/10/2012 12:45 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: On 09/10/2012 07:14 PM, John Stultz wrote: In the meantime, I'll try to reproduce on my T61. If you could send me your .config, I'd appreciate it. http://pastebin.com/qSxqfdDK The header of the config file shows for a v3.5-rc7 because

Re: TI LT 3.0 Tracking branches

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:04 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > The status is currently on linus HEAD, Panda EHCI is broken which is a bit > > of a downer; Jassi is taking a look at it. Also video is coming up nicely > > with 1080p raster, but it is stuck at 640 x 480 framebuffer viewport inside > > t

Re: TI LT 3.0 Tracking branches

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 14:39 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > Half a year ago when I did ask for comments about the usefulness of the > linaro-next tree, I got almost no responses as I suspected, and I > therefore dropped that tree to concentrate my efforts on the Linaro > "stable" branches. If eve

Pandaboard broken in Linus' git tree

Booting Panda with Linus' current git tree (3.0-rc5-130) and got the following: [2.066558] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver [2.073730] Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406) at 0x [2.081146] Internal error: : 1406 [#1] SMP [2.085540] Mo

Re: Pandaboard broken in Linus' git tree

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 18:00 -0700, john stultz wrote: > Booting Panda with Linus' current git tree (3.0-rc5-130) and got the > following: > > [2.066558] ehci_hcd: USB 2.0 'Enhanced' Host Controller (EHCI) Driver > [2.073730] Unhandled fault: imprec

Re: Pandaboard broken in Linus' git tree

On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 20:32 -0500, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:16 PM, john stultz wrote: > >> So is there a fix in the works or should I request Linus just revert > > that? > > Other then the discussion on linux-usb that found it and mentioned it

linaro-android-3.0 git tree is up!

I've just pushed a 3.0 based branch to the Linaro+Android git tree, which can be found here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.0 See the revision log here: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/android.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linaro-android-3.0 At the m

Re: linaro-android-3.0 git tree is up!

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:48 -0700, john stultz wrote: > Known issues: > - > o The ADB code has changed in 3.0, and requires some commands from > userland at boot in order to be enabled. See bug #807230 for details. > > o EDID isn't yet working, so to get gr

Re: linaro-android-3.0 git tree is up!

On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:52 -0700, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:48 -0700, john stultz wrote: > > Known issues: > > - > > o The ADB code has changed in 3.0, and requires some commands from > > userland at boot in order to be enabled.

Re: Consistent names for Linaro kernel trees and releases

On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 1 July 2011 12:14, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > Each of the trees have various tags and branches based on how each > > team and developer > > works and I don't want to ask folks to change what they are doing for > > their day to work. > > Wh

Re: Please tag commits referred to by pinned and release manifests in Android builds

On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 09:11 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with > each commit explicitly listed. We also use this method to create a > release. We depend on these pinned commits - if they don't exist the > "released" builds can no longer

Re: Please tag commits referred to by pinned and release manifests in Android builds

On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 04:07 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Zach Pfeffer > > wrote: > >> In-order to make reproducible builds we create pinned manifests with > >> each commit explicitly listed. We also us

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Add ARM cpu topology definition

On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 18:23 +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote: > From: Vincent Guittot > > (Patch accepted by Russell for 3.1: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg131273.html) > > The affinity between ARM processors is defined in the MPIDR register. > We can identify which processors are in th

Re: The Linaro-3.0 kernel branch is now open

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> Please let me know if you want to see something merged into the > >> linaro-3.0 tree before Thursday

Re: The Linaro-3.0 kernel branch is now open

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote: > > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > >> Please let me know if you want to

Re: The Linaro-3.0 kernel branch is now open

On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:47 -0700, john stultz wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 16:34 -0700, john stultz wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:18 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > > > On 21 July 2011 15:08, john stultz wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:57 -0400, Nicola

The Linaro+Android 11.07 freeze kernel is now available

So unfortunately its a few days late due to me being on vacation and the omap dss merge snafu I hit Thursday that has since been resolved (thanks Nico & Deepak!) Anyway, the 11.07 freeze kernel is available here: git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git linaro-android-3.0 And is tagged as

Re: The Linaro+Android 11.07 freeze kernel is now available

On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 20:14 +0100, Andy Green wrote: > On 07/25/2011 06:40 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > So unfortunately its a few days late due to me being on vacation and the > > omap dss merge snafu I hit Thursday that has since been resolved (thanks > > Nico& Deepak!) > >

Re: Kernel WG Android session

On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:33 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Landing teams and other interested parties, > > John Stultz will be in the Android hacking room from 11:00-13:00 > (possibly earlier for working with Andy) on Monday. Err. I think you meant Tuesday, right? Monday is team meeti

Re: Update on Gerrit deployment

On Sat, 2011-08-27 at 21:29 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 08/27/2011 02:15 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > Gerrit is that it doesn't care if the tree has been rebased. It will > > just try and merge the changeset on top of the current tree, whatever > > the history so in that cas

[Request] Can Linaro-dev not send duplicate mail to recipients?

So being on vacation for a few days and checking my mail and have found an explosion of emails. Unfortunately most of them are duplicates. It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who are already recipients of the email. So if you're on linaro-dev and you're also To/CC'ed

Re: [Request] Can Linaro-dev not send duplicate mail to recipients?

On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:45 +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 21:05 -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > It seems the linaro-dev list isn't configed to avoid mailing folks who > > are already recipients of the email. > > Go to http://lists.linaro.org/

Re: Update on Gerrit deployment

On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 10:35 +0800, Andy Green wrote: > On 08/28/2011 05:20 AM, Somebody in the thread at some point said: > > But I've got an open mind and am willing to try it out and figure out a > > workflow. I suspect for me it really won't be anything other then a > > different location to "gi

Re: Choosing the timer to use in benchmarking

On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:43 +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > I was quite impressed with how steady the process clock was under > different CPU loads. It doesn't seem to round up or down to a > scheduler tick either which is nice. Hmm. Very interesting results! Its been a little while since I've looke

Re: [ACTIVITY] Kernel WG Weekly Status report for week ending 2011-09-02

On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:04 -0300, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > > > John S, can you give more details or at least pointers to your talk, > so we can see if this can be useful for our kernel packaging > maintenance in some sort? Its more of a BOF, so I'll try to summarize the talk as well as the feed

Re: Export kernel defconfig through android-build

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:13 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > git clone git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git > cd android > git checkout linaro-android-3.0 Minor nit here, going forward I think we want to point folks to the tree here: git://android.git.linaro.org/kernel/linaro-androi

Re: Export kernel defconfig through android-build

On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 14:13 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > On 16 September 2011 14:10, john stultz wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:13 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > >> git clone git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/android.git > >> cd android > >> git checkout

11.09 Snapshot Linaro+Android Baseline Release

Just wanted to announce the availability of the September 2011 Linaro/Android baseline development snapshot: linux-linaro-3.0-2011.09-0-android-1 This is based on the linux-linaro-3.0-2011.09-0 kernel + the upstream Android branch from Google, and provides the base kernel tree that LT android tre

SCHED_MC dropped from ARM configs?

Hey Amit, In updating our tree to 3.1, I noticed the SCHED_MC config option dropped out of the savedefconfig and it doesn't seem to be found in the arm Kconfig. Is that expected? Or are there out of tree patches that provide the SCHED_MC option for 3.1? thanks -john

Re: Which kernel version fo 11.10?

On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 17:03 -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote: > Here are the kernels we're using on the second Android pre-release: > > Tracking Panda > Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ > > Staging Panda > Linux version 3.1.0-rc9+ (coincidence) > > Beagle xM, Beagle, Panda > Linux version 3.1.0-rc9-09767-g52e3

Re: Linaro Kernel October 2011 Release

On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 03:11 -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote: > The Linaro Kernel Working Group (KWG) is excited to announce the > availability our October 2011 development snapshot: > > linux-linaro-3.1-2011.10-1 > > As the word "snapshot" implies, these are meant as development kernels > and have not

Initial linaro-android-3.1 kernel for 11.11

Just wanted to announce that the initial Linaro+Android-3.1 kernel for 11.11 is available. I've tagged it as: linux-linaro-3.1-2011.11-0-android-0 >From the branch: git://android.git.linaro.org/kernel/linaro-android.git linaro-android-3.1-agreen-rebase Please remember Nico is freezing the 11.11

Linaro Android Kernel Release for Nov 2011

Just following the release of the linux-linaro-3.1-20011.11-0 tag being made, I've updated the Linaro+Android tree. I've tagged it as: linux-linaro-3.1-2011.11-0-android-1 >From the branch: git://android.git.linaro.org/kernel/linaro-android.git linaro-android-3.1-agreen-rebase thanks -john

Initial Linaro+Android kernel for 11.12 is available

Zach reminded me that this month is compressed, so a linaro+android kernel would be needed immediately for 11.12. As Andrey is just ramping up in taking over for the Linaro Android kernel maintenance, I wanted to just get a kernel out, using the older kernel workflow, so that we had someth

Re: Problems with timers with linux-next on snowball

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:06 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Daniel Lezcano > wrote: > > [Me] > >>> It is easy to reproduce with 'time sleep 1' where the timer expires 1, 2 > >>> or 3 seconds later. > >>> > >>> It seems that does not happen with linux-linaro-3.1 but I

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Android fixes w.r.t. 3.6 kernel

On 09/10/2012 10:22 PM, Tushar Behera wrote: Ping !!! On 08/31/2012 09:57 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Required for android-3.6 tree. Tushar Behera (2): netfilter: xt_quota2: Move away from NLMSG_PUT() netfilter: xt_quota2: Update parameter list in netlink_kernel_create net/netfilter/xt_q

Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE freeze the system (Was Re: [PATCH] acpi : remove power from acpi_processor_cx structure)

On 09/10/2012 11:58 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: Would you mind testing the following patch? It seems to resolve the issue, but I've not yet run it through my test suite to make sure it didn't break anything else. No problem, I will try it this evening. Is this problem related to all 32bits arch ?

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

On 11/29/2012 06:04 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .config This looks ok to me, although you might want to add some extra details in the commit log as to why this is useful. And one minor nit below. thanks -john @@ -100,7 +112,7 @@ for MERGE_FI

Re: [PATCH] merge_config.sh: Add option to specify output dir

On 12/02/2012 11:36 PM, Zhangfei Gao wrote: Provide a -O option to specify dir to put generated .config Then merge_config.sh does not need to be copied to target dir, for easy re-usage in other script Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao Tested-by: Jon Medhurst (Tixy) Acked-by: John Stultz thanks

Re: [GIT PULL] cpufreq-interactive-gov-master-v1

On 12/04/2012 02:39 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote: On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 05:30:03PM +0400, Andrey Konovalov wrote: [...] How do you suggest to solve these issues? That you, Andrey and the 'the guy maintaining the Android topic' Deepak, is th

Re: [PATCH] gpu: ion: Use RB_CLEAR_NODE instead of rb_init_node

On 11/15/2012 02:02 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: rb_init_node() has been removed from the kernel, use alternate macro. Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- This patch also needs to go into android-3.7 tree. Thanks for this. Sorry it took me so long, but I've just now merged this into the linaro-an

Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: gadget: android: Fix build error because of removal of usb_gadget_controller_number

On 11/15/2012 01:17 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Required as per commit ed9cbda ("usb: gadget: remove usb_gadget_controller_number()"). Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera Thanks! Merged into linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list

Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: gadget: android: Fix build error because of change in composite driver framework

On 11/15/2012 01:17 AM, Tushar Behera wrote: Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera --- Thanks! Merged into linaro-android-3.7-anton-rebase. -john ___ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev

  1   2   >