Hello,
There was weird problem with android git mirror again
(https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/patrik-ryd_lt-panda/4/consoleFull):
error: revision tilt-linaro-android.38 in
git.linaro.org/people/andygreen/kernel-tilt not found Archiving
artifacts Finished: FAILURE
This was 100% repro
On 06/01/2011 10:21 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Another cheap thing to do would be to dump the config from the kernel
package in to the output dir, so you can see the config without having
to download the hwpack or produce an image. This can be useful, much
like the new .manif
Hello Arnd,
[]
> > No, sorry for the confusion and not making this clear - I wrote the
> > original mail as a follow-up to "Android Code Review" session,
> > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro-android/+spec/linaro-android-o-code-review
> >
> > http://summit.linaro.org/uds-o/meeting/linaro-a
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:32:10PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 June 2011 16:56:07 Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 03:36:47PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> > > +++ Arnd Bergmann [2011-06-01 16:11 +0200]:
> > > > On Wednesday 01 June 2011, Wookey wrote:
> > >
> > > > I abso
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:37:30PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Dave Martin [2011-06-01 15:56 +0100]:
> > Separate question how big is Debian-installer, in terms of filesystem
> > and RAM footprint?
>
> There are various flavours. Primarily:
>
> 1) a 'full' image which is 160MB and includes the bas
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:24:12 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There was weird problem with android git mirror again
> (https://android-build.linaro.org/jenkins/job/patrik-ryd_lt-panda/4/consoleFull):
>
> error: revision tilt-linaro-android.38 in
> git.linaro.org/people/andygreen/kernel
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 21:18:44 +1200
Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
[]
> > Once I moved that ".git.git" repo away, original issue with repo
> > sync resolved. I have no idea that double-.git repo was created.
> > Based on the timestamp, it was created first, and later barely
> > update
for the GWG cycle public plans 20110602 (today!). Check the
[[https://wiki.linaro.org/Cycles//PublicPlanReview|PublicPlanReview]] page!
* Memory management: Jesse sent out a status report after the UDS
mini-summit discussions. Jesse will coordinate these activities with
Sumit and Rob.
* NUX
Hi All,
The minutes of the power management weekly call can be found at :
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/PowerManagement/Meetings/2011-06-01
Summary:
* A block diagram has been added to the thermal wiki page. A 1st port
of thermal framework is ongoing on panda.
* Powerdebug code has bee
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 09:59 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
>
>> I have a board at home I can try to reproduce with if someone on the pm
>> team
>> doesn't. I probably won't be able to get to it until later in the week
>> though.
>>
>
> Ok, thanks very much.
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:12:29AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
> or cloned from either of those:
>
>
On 06/02/2011 06:14 PM, Paul Larson wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Daniel Lezcanowrote:
On 06/01/2011 09:59 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
I have a board at home I can try to reproduce with if someone on the pm
team
doesn't. I probably won't be able to get to it until later in the week
thoug
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Dave Martin wrote:
> vexpress
>
>
> linux-linaro-2.6.39/master doesn't seem to work on vexpress using the
> linux-linaro-natty configuration (I get "starting the kernel", then
> nothing).
>
> Upstream v2.6.39 does appear to work fully on vexpress in both ARM and
> Th
On 06/02/2011 12:12 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> This will continue to evolve as this is just the beginning for that
> tree, so more stuff will be merged. Only smoke tested on a Dove board,
> and compile tested for OMAP so far.
>
I just tried some testing of my Overo with the omap2plus_defconfi
Paul
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Paul Sokolovsky
wrote:
>
> This is even more interesting, with Google people confirming that repo
> --mirror works within some bounds and limitations:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/repo-discuss/browse_thread/thread/401656c3ad0a4a0c
>
> Finally, here's t
== Weekly Status report ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Status/2011-06-02
== Weekly Meetings minutes ==
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-05-30
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-06-02
== Summary ==
* Public plan review c
I went through Kiko's request:
- What kernel tree it was built from
(A URL to the git tree)
- What revision
(A revision ID)
- What patches were applied on top of it
(A URL to the patchset, maybe?)
- What kernel config was used to build it
(A separate file in
On 01/06/11 19:41, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> This week I initiated a confused conversation during the techleads
> call about having a way to describe what the hardware pack was built
> from. We had a couple of false starts but I think we agreeing that there
> needs to b
I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
presume if those patches were headed upstream they would be headed
upstream:). If not they they shou
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
> presume if those patches were headed upstream they wou
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 01:12 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Time to leave 2.6.38 behind and move on! We now have a 2.6.39 based
> Linaro kernel which can be viewed here:
>
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=kernel/linux-linaro-2.6.39.git;a=summary
>
> or cloned from either of those:
>
> git://
Hello everyone.
I wrote dh_splitpackage, a helper script that unambiguously splits the
files of a binary package into multiple packages based on a
configuration file.
The configuration file may point the primary package (the one that gets
leftover files by default) as well as any number of a
On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality. I
>> pre
On 2 June 2011 19:01, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>>> in or should we plan on
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> >>
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
> >> in or should we plan
On 2 June 2011 22:12, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>
>> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>> >
>> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> >> wonderful are missing. My question now is
On 2 June 2011 21:39, Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 09:01:01PM -0500, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On 2 June 2011 18:55, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>> >
>> >> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> >> wonderful ar
Fixes dependency build error with "make O=" option.
"make O=" option is used to specify output directory.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
mmc_spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mmc_spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/
Hi,
Typo error in writing the mailing address during git-send-email .. hence
resending.
-- Tushar
Original Message
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: S5P: Fix compilation error for exynos4_defconfig
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 10:37:19 +0530
From: Tushar Behera
To: linux-samsung-...@vger.ker
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Rigby wrote:
>
>> I noticed all the fine AndyDoan/Ricardo fixes that make panda
>> wonderful are missing. My question now is should that stuff go back
>> in or should we plan on a LT/BSP kernel for full functionality.
Hi Marek,
Thanks for your review.
On Friday 03 June 2011 11:23 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
On Friday, June 03, 2011 7:07 AM Tushar Behera wrote:
EHCI requires that USB support be enabled in kernel config.
Selecting USB_SUPPORT with S5P_DEV_USB_EHCI fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: T
32 matches
Mail list logo
