Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the
partition numbers to mount.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang
---
init.rc |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init.rc b/init.rc
index 7f94a21..c2836b9 100644
--- a/init.rc
+++ b/init.rc
Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the
sdcard partition number.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang
---
vold.fstab |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vold.fstab b/vold.fstab
index c17bb64..04b9690 100644
--- a/vold.fstab
+++ b/vold.
Due to ramdisk introduced that replace the rootfs partition, adjust the
sdcard partition number.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Chang
---
vold.fstab |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vold.fstab b/vold.fstab
index c17bb64..04b9690 100644
--- a/vold.fstab
+++ b/vold.
All,
It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this i.MX53
QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the
graphics/video drivers, and the memory size reserved has to consider the
worst case. And we have to live with this before the unified memory all
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> All,
>
> It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this i.MX53
> QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the
> graphics/video drivers, and the memory size reserved has to consider the
>
Dear Minkyu,
On 18 April 2011 13:00, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 18 April 2011 12:50, Chander Kashyap
> wrote:
> >
> > No need to change. As existing gpio configuration is as per s5pc1xx
> > specification.
>
> According to S5PC110 TRM, DRV levels are as following,
>
> 00 =
On 18 April 2011 16:03, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this
> i.MX53
> > QuickStart board. There is a large chunk of memory being reserved for the
> > graphics/video dr
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Modified to extract correct elements of power_entry structure.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
cpu/cpu.cpp |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu/cpu.cpp b/cpu/cpu.cpp
index 451c120..f9995be 100644
--- a/cpu/cpu.cpp
+++ b
Hi,
notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are
available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-04-13
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Grap
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap
Added a compulsory field bogomips for each processor in case other
fields like model is missing. Error handling code added in case
of package id remains uninitialised.
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap
---
cpu/cpu.cpp |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+),
The following set of patches modify the powertop version 2.0 to work
for ARM platform. The C states and P states was measured after doing
these changes in powertop.
Amit Daniel Kachhap (2):
Modified Powertop to support ARM processor
Added an arm compiler flag
cpu/cpu.cpp |8 +++-
1
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 18 April 2011 13:53, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong.
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h | 7 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/a
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 18 April 2011 12:50, Chander Kashyap wrote:
>
> No need to change. As existing gpio configuration is as per s5pc1xx
> specification.
According to S5PC110 TRM, DRV levels are as following,
00 = 1x
10 = 2x
01 = 3x
11 = 4x
Please fix it at s5pc1xx also.
Thanks
Minkyu Kan
Dear Chander Kashyap,
On 15 April 2011 14:05, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> SROM config code is made common for S5P series of boards.
> smdkc100.c now refers to s5p-common/sromc.c for SROM related
> subroutines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/Makefile |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Spring Zhang wrote:
>
>
> On 18 April 2011 16:03, Dave Martin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 03:34:21PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > It was found that the ubuntu-desktop is a bit memory hungry on this
>> > i.MX53
>> > QuickStart board. There i
S5PC2XX: Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong.
S5PC1XX: Macro values for Driver Strength were wrong.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
Changes for V2:
- Macro value order fixed.
- Added Changes for S5PC1XX.
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h |4 ++-
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
> On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
>> From: Patrik Ryd
>>
>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
>> ---
>> tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++--
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> hi Patrik,
>
> Does
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
>> On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
>>> From: Patrik Ryd
>>>
>>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
>>> ---
>>> tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++--
>>> 1 files c
On 18 April 2011 21:01, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
>> On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
>>> From: Patrik Ryd
>>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
>> hi Patrik,
>> Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessar
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
>>> On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
From: Patrik Ryd
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for k
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
> From: Patrik Ryd
>
> I
John,
I pulled the tree from:
source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git
branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0
board config: omap4430panda_config
(referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid_Main#Getting_Started)
-Zach
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon,
Thanks for the links Zach.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
> John,
>
> I pulled the tree from:
>
> source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git
> branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0
> board config: omap4430panda_config
>
> (referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid
Hi all,
One of the big issues we've been faced with at Linaro is around GPU
and multimedia device integration, in particular the memory management
requirements for supporting them on ARM. This next cycle, we'll be
focusing on driving consensus around a unified memory management
solution for embed
Hi all,
One of the big issues we've been faced with at Linaro is around GPU
and multimedia device integration, in particular the memory management
requirements for supporting them on ARM. This next cycle, we'll be
focusing on driving consensus around a unified memory management
solution for embed
Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the
Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on April 13th
in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC.
https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/DevPlatform/Meetings/2011-04-13
Actions from the meeting where as follows
Hi there. There's a problem with the thread local storage register in
the Tegra 2 which is exposed by Ubuntu switching to GCC 4.5. The
fault is quite serious and causes many applications to segfault.
There's more details in LP: #739374.
The problem is Tegra 2 specific and is caused by bit 20 of
On 18 April 2011 22:35, Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. There's a problem with the thread local storage register in
> the Tegra 2 which is exposed by Ubuntu switching to GCC 4.5. The
> fault is quite serious and causes many applications to segfault.
> There's more details in LP: #739374.
>
> The
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang wrote:
> On 18 Ap
On 19 April 2011 14:28, Amit Pundir wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer wrote:
>>> That would be very nice. There's actually some documentation in u-boot
>>> about fastboot (a README). I wonder if there's some support a
30 matches
Mail list logo
