John, I pulled the tree from:
source: git://gitorious.org/pandaboard/u-boot.git branch: origin/omap4_panda_es2.0 board config: omap4430panda_config (referenced http://omappedia.org/wiki/OMAP_Pandroid_Main#Getting_Started) -Zach On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zach Pfeffer <pfeff...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Alexander Sack <a...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Zach Pfeffer <pfeff...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Jim Huang <jim.hu...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> On 18 April 2011 14:40, <patrik....@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>> From: Patrik Ryd <patrik....@linaro.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). >>>>>> --- >>>>>> tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> hi Patrik, >>>>> >>>>> Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessary support for common >>>>> LEB? >>>>> >>>>> I am not sure if we should introduce an abstract provider for kernel >>>>> image, but I prefer to specify in board configurations since we might >>>>> migrate to other 'fastboot' compatible boot loader implementations >>>>> such as lk (little kernel) used in Qualcomm patform. >>>> >>>> I haven't gotten into lk too much (used it and the legacy fastboot), >>>> but it seems that sticking with u-boot may be a better approach since >>>> it has wider community support and better cross-platform support. Was >>>> there a specific reason to move to lk? >>> >>> I am happy to have a discussion about our default android bootloader >>> at LDS in budapest. >>> >>> IIRC, one blueprint that John Rigby wanted to own is about adding >>> fastboot support to u-boot ... maybe thats a good compromise instead >>> of lk? >> >> That would be very nice. There's actually some documentation in u-boot >> about fastboot (a README). I wonder if there's some support already? > > Yes, I was told that someone (TI?) had a public tree with it. If all > goes well, John (CCed) would review those, clean the patches up, > upstream and integrate then into our u-boot branches so we can have > them for our LEB builds as well. > > -- > > - Alexander > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
