Hi Per
Just have a glance of your patch, good thinking. But I have a question
about this patch. You modified mmc_test to test your driver. Does it mean your
driver's performance enhancement depends on application? The caller must have
to know the next request so that could make driver p
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
[...]
> +static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
> + struct mmc_test_multiple_rw *tdata,
> + unsigned int reqsize, unsigned int size)
> +{
> + unsigned int dev
Dear Minkyu,
On 15 April 2011 11:59, Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Chander Kashyap,
>
> On 14 April 2011 18:17, Chander Kashyap
> wrote:
> > Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h |6
Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h |8 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.
Dear Minku,
Please ignore this patch. As i have removed
#define GPIO_DRV_FAST 0x0
#define GPIO_DRV_SLOW 0x1
as these are not defined for s5pc2xx.
But being reffered in s5p_gpio.c.
I will add again and send the patch.
Regards,
Chander
On 18 April 2011 09:31, Chander Kashyap wrote:
> Macro valu
Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h |7 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h
From: Patrik Ryd
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
---
tasks/kernel.mk |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tasks/kernel.mk b/tasks/kernel.mk
index a016d6e..f0ebb93 100644
--- a/tasks/kernel.mk
+++ b/tasks/kernel.mk
@@ -
In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
This patch is Linaro specific and should not be contibuted to AOSP.
---
target/board/Android.mk |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/board/Android.mk b/target/board/Android.mk
index 8
On 18 April 2011 14:40, wrote:
> From: Patrik Ryd
>
> In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel).
> ---
> tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
hi Patrik,
Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessary support for comm
