On 18 April 2011 14:40, <patrik....@linaro.org> wrote: > From: Patrik Ryd <patrik....@linaro.org> > > In the Linaro set up u-boot will look for uImage (and not for kernel). > --- > tasks/kernel.mk | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
hi Patrik, Does this imply that we requires u-boot as necessary support for common LEB? I am not sure if we should introduce an abstract provider for kernel image, but I prefer to specify in board configurations since we might migrate to other 'fastboot' compatible boot loader implementations such as lk (little kernel) used in Qualcomm patform. Thanks, -jserv > diff --git a/tasks/kernel.mk b/tasks/kernel.mk > index a016d6e..f0ebb93 100644 > --- a/tasks/kernel.mk > +++ b/tasks/kernel.mk > @@ -3,5 +3,5 @@ android_kernel: > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=../$(TARGET_TOOLS_PREFIX) defconfig > $(KERNEL_CONFIG) &&\ > make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=../$(TARGET_TOOLS_PREFIX) uImage > > -$(PRODUCT_OUT)/kernel: android_kernel > - ln -sf ../../../../kernel/arch/arm/boot/uImage $(PRODUCT_OUT)/kernel > \ No newline at end of file > +$(PRODUCT_OUT)/uImage: android_kernel > + ln -sf ../../../../kernel/arch/arm/boot/uImage $(PRODUCT_OUT)/uImage > \ No newline at end of file > -- > 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
