Re: [PATCH 1/5] arm/dts: babbage: add gpt and uart related clock nodes

2011-03-13 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:44:48AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:48:10AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The patch is to add all gpt, uart related dt clock nodes for babbage. > > > It sticks to the clock name used in cloc

Re: [PATCH 2/5] arm/mxc: add clk members to ease dt clock support

2011-03-13 Thread Shawn Guo
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:56:34AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > The 'rate' is added for fixed-clock support, while 'pll_base' is for > > > pll clock.  These two particular type of

Re: Instructions for building Linaro GCC with crosstool-NG

2011-03-13 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:28:15PM +1300, Michael Hope wrote: > I've written some short instructions on using crosstool-NG to build Linaro > GCC: > https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Using/CrosstoolNg > > Could someone review these for me please? > > Linaro GCC is already available

Re: Instructions for building Linaro GCC with crosstool-NG

2011-03-13 Thread Michael Hope
Ta. I've added links to this and others to: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Using -- Michael On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:28:15PM +1300, Michael Hope wrote: >> I've written some short instructions on using crosstool-NG to

Re: Better reviews for the same cost in gcc-linaro

2011-03-13 Thread Michael Hope
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > On 9 March 2011 20:56, Michael Hope wrote: >> We currently use a feature branch / merge request / merge / test / >> push approach in gcc-linaro.  This works fine for a reasonable cost >> but can mean that patches sit unreviewed and unme

Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] arm/dt: add basic mx51 device tree support

2011-03-13 Thread Jason Hui
Hi, Arnd, On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 11 March 2011, Jason Hui wrote: >> >> Alternatively, it could be done the other way round: rename the >> >> identifiers >> >> in the file from mx51_ to mx5_, and make sure that they don't contain >> >> any mx51 specific