On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:56:34AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:53:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > The 'rate' is added for fixed-clock support, while 'pll_base' is for
> > > pll clock. These two particular type of clocks are supposed to be
> > > gracefully supported by the common clk api when it gets ready.
> >
> > How does the current imx clock code handle fixed and pll clocks?
>
> For fixed-clock, the current code gets several variables holding the
> rate and then return the rate from several get_rate functions.
>
> static unsigned long external_high_reference, external_low_reference;
> static unsigned long oscillator_reference, ckih2_reference;
>
> static unsigned long get_high_reference_clock_rate(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return external_high_reference;
> }
>
> static unsigned long get_low_reference_clock_rate(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return external_low_reference;
> }
>
> static unsigned long get_oscillator_reference_clock_rate(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return oscillator_reference;
> }
>
> static unsigned long get_ckih2_reference_clock_rate(struct clk *clk)
> {
> return ckih2_reference;
> }
>
> With this new rate member added, all these can be consolidated into one.
>
> For base address of pll, the current code uses the reference to clocks
> statically defined to know which pll is the one.
>
I just noticed that the references to clocks statically created are
being used in the current clock code widely, and I need to work around
it 'globally' anyway, so I will not add the new member 'pll_base'.
> static inline void __iomem *_mx51_get_pll_base(struct clk *pll)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> return pll->pll_base;
> #else
> if (pll == &pll1_main_clk)
> return MX51_DPLL1_BASE;
> else if (pll == &pll2_sw_clk)
> return MX51_DPLL2_BASE;
> else if (pll == &pll3_sw_clk)
> return MX51_DPLL3_BASE;
> else
> BUG();
>
> return NULL;
> #endif
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *_get_pll_base(struct clk *pll)
> {
> if (cpu_is_mx51())
> return _mx51_get_pll_base(pll);
> else
> return _mx53_get_pll_base(pll);
> }
>
> > Using the dt shouldn't require any special treatment in this regard.
> >
> I would say these two members were added to make dt clock code simple
> and good.
--
Regards,
Shawn
_______________________________________________
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
