Dnia niedziela, 14 listopada 2010 o 23:26:46 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> Hi there. I've been looking into updating the QT4 atomic operations
> as an alternative to working around it in GCC. There's ARM specific
> code in:
> There are bigger problems here though:
> * There's code in corelib/arc
On Sunday 14 November 2010 23:26:46 Michael Hope wrote:
> Hi there. I've been looking into updating the QT4 atomic operations
> as an alternative to working around it in GCC. There's ARM specific
> code in:
> http://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qt/blobs/4.7/src/corelib/arch/qatomic_armv6.h
> that should
Hi Yong,
> Yes, it's also nice to have a file containing all the clock information
> which you have implemented in the email.
> Since we expect more features like enable/disable clocks in the debugfs, we
> also like to have tree-like debugfs for clock information.
Sure; if you want the extended f
Dnia niedziela, 14 listopada 2010 o 23:26:46 Michael Hope napisał(a):
> Hi there. I've been looking into updating the QT4 atomic operations
> as an alternative to working around it in GCC. There's ARM specific
> code in:
> There are bigger problems here though:
> * There's code in corelib/arc
Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
would help?
* Linaro integrates its kernel tree into Ubuntu for two reasons:
- because Linaro uses Ubuntu as a base to build its own derived
images (
Hi all,
thanks to the restless efforts of the User Platforms team and friends,
we have concluded our clutter/mutter/clutk/unity work for the previous
cycle. Although we didn't get to the point of providing an ultra smooth
user experience, this is still a great success and more than we hoped
for at
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
> Some highlights from our efforts:
Alexandros, thanks for the good summary; this is an awesome end-to-end
project demonstrating:
* how to work well with upstreams
* how to achieve state of the art graphics experience on ARM
* how to empower ve
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:05:20AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
> >> That's understandable. Now the question is why John is maintaining and
> >
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
> summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
> would help?
>
>
> * Linaro integrates its kernel tree into Ubuntu for two reasons:
> - because Lin
Good discussion. Stupid question - what is the Ubuntu sauce? I'll ask the
kernel dudes in their meeting in two minutes...
Dave
On 15 Nov 2010, at 15:53, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself,
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Christian Robottom Reis
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 03:05:20AM -0200, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Nicolas Pitre
>> wrote:
>> >>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Ricardo Salveti wrote:
>> >> Th
For what it's worth, I agree with Kiko's statement. We have three
stakeholders - internal use of the kernel by Linaro, external use by
distributions (such as Ubuntu) and external use by community. We need to
position ourselves appropriately...
Dave
On 15 Nov 2010, at 15:57, John Rigby wrot
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, David Rusling wrote:
> Good discussion. Stupid question - what is the Ubuntu sauce? I'll
> ask the kernel dudes in their meeting in two minutes...
Some Ubuntu specific patches are prefixed by "SAUCE" in their subject
line / commit message, but the Ubuntu Sauce we refer
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Proposed plan:
> > * Oliver/Ricardo to confirm with Ubuntu Security Team whether it's ok
> > to base Ubuntu ARM images on linux-linaro tree as constructed
> > currently
> I can't speak for the U
hi,
Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 08:53 -0700 schrieb John Rigby:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Folks, I think this thread is circling a bit back to itself, perhaps
> > summarizing where we stand and what problems we're trying to solve
> > would help?
> >
> >
> > * Lin
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> I'm seeing some speculations wrt increased effort and would like to help
> finding solutions if there is actually a problem.
I'm seeing mainly the same thing: solutions looking for a problem. :)
I guess the only remaining chat is about security su
Lee,
I created a page on how to package a kernel. There are some hacks
here that would not be appropriate when packaging a kernel for a real
upload but should work fine for landing team testing.
https://wiki.linaro.org/PackageYourOwnKernel
John
___
l
On 10 Nov 15, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> /* If we're using the common struct clk, we define the base clk object here
> */
> @@ -64,14 +66,25 @@ struct clk {
> struct mutexmutex;
> spinlock_t spinlock;
> } lock;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_DEBUG
> + const char
Hi Amit,
> > @@ -64,14 +66,25 @@ struct clk {
> >
> > struct mutexmutex;
> > spinlock_t spinlock;
> >
> > } lock;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_DEBUG
> > + const char name[CLK_NAME_LEN];
> > + struct list_headlist;
> > +#endif /* CO
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for those comments. I attached a formal patch below for further
review, hope I catched all your points right.
Du to that I am behind a firewall, my free internet access is problematic,
so I send out patch review by copying it to email.
After this patch, powerdebug (developed by A
20 matches
Mail list logo
