Does anybody have more comments on [PATCHv2] ?
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Yong Shen wrote:
>
> > Using wp_tbl is because that it also contains information like regulator
>> > voltage.
>>
>> The clock code does not handle the regulators, not even in the fsl
>> kernel.
>>
> I did not mean to
Nico,
Yes it has been reviewed several times now. So I'm hopeful it'll go in
for the next merge window.
Without it, linaro-media-create can't work since we don't support
anything except SD boot for now.
/Amit
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> Looks like discussion is st
I have updated the cpufreq_powertop_V2.patch with an enum for frequency index.
Vincent
On 11 October 2010 14:30, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 10 Oct 11, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> On 11 October 2010 10:58, Amit Kucheria wrote:
>> > On 10 Oct 11, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Please f
Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> Hi Amit and Jeremy,
>
> This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> I want to add some code in common clock code to export clock information
Patch looks OK. I'm not sure who is working to integrate the ST-E
kernel into the common Linaro tree though. We want these 3 patches
included there, and if relevant sent to mainline.
To repeat my question since I'm still not clear, is there
cpufreq/cpuidle support for ux500 in mainline?
Regards,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
[...]
> There might be an interesting speedup + bugfix in aligning the rootfs
> partition on a power of two, e.g. 1 MiB boundary, as the SD/MMC is
> flash internally, and undergoes erase/write cycles for fs meta-data.
> I think only OMAP has
Should be of general interest to Linaro..
- Forwarded message from Matt Zimmerman -
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:48:42 +0100
From: Matt Zimmerman
To: canonical-t...@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Canonical-tech] Visualizing reads, writes and alignment
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
h
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> 32 sectors * 16 heads is what I usually use -- this gives a 256KB
> cylinder size, which should be an integral number of underlying erase
> blocks on pretty much any flash device, and has divided exactly into
> the size of every SD card of flash stick I ha
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Jamie Bennett wrote:
[...]
>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:13:40PM +0100, Harry Liebel wrote:
I've had mixed results. When the box completes the boot the basic systems
seem to work ok (I can get an IP and poke the filesystem). It still takes
sever
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 11:17 +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> Sincle I believe this is a known issue with the hardware, it could be
> wise to streamline the putting of bootloader and filesystem on
> separate devices.
>
> Manually at least, this wasn't too hard: I ran linaro-media-create,
> copied the bo
Vishwa,
I have a more-or-less complete set of example code for CPU context
save/restore, currently supporting A5/A8/A9 and with planned support for Eagle.
It is structured as "firmware" at the moment, but it would be much better if it
was integrated into the ARM Linux kernel. The idea is the ke
Hi Jon,
That is a nice follow up to the OMAP idle code clean up, cf.
http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-dev/2010-October/001084.html.
It would be nice to see how the code is organized and the impact of
integrating it into the kernel.
Regards,
Jean
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jon Call
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: linaro-dev-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:linaro-dev-
> boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Jon Callan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:10 PM
> To: linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Common ARM context save/restore code
>
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a
Jon,
I'm sure you anticipated this - What is your plan for pushing this out
to the kernel? :)
And how can we help?
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Jon Callan wrote:
> Vishwa,
>
> I have a more-or-less complete set of example code for CPU context
> save/restore, currently supporting A5/A8/A9 a
Jean,
Yes, it is basically doing the same stuff as the OMAP idle code, but in a more
generic way. It is mostly C, with assembler helper functions.
I need to find out whether I can release the code.
Jon.
-Original Message-
From: Jean Pihet [mailto:jean.pi...@newoldbits.com]
Sent: 12 Oct
Well, my plan was to... er... post a message on linaro-dev and see happened!
And yes, refactor as an ARM-common driver + SoC-specific stubs, that sounds
about right.
I plan to work on the Linux integration from 1st December. I have done some
Linux kernel work before but I'm a little rusty.
Jon
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
>> 32 sectors * 16 heads is what I usually use -- this gives a 256KB
>> cylinder size, which should be an integral number of underlying erase
>> blocks on pretty much any flash device, and has divided e
Note: there are some arithmetic bugs in the above code ... but you get
the general idea.
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
:)
As you can see, if you make the source available somewhere, there is plenty
of people interested in dissecting it.
Jon, if you start working on them in December, we'll almost certainly miss
the 2.6.38 merge window to get it integrated to mainline.
/Amit
p.s. /me makes a note to talk to bo...@
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> So we can make the /boot partition look like it has 63*255 geometry,
> and we can make it start at sector offset 63.
Right; ideally, we'd offset it so that it's still on a nice boundary
e.g. we start at sector 512 (1, 8, 8)
> Everything else can be det
Amit,
Yes, it does seem a little tight doesn't it? Bobby is who I'm working with on
this, btw.
Maybe I could get the source code tidied and open it up in 2-3 weeks time? Then
we can all work on it together :-)
Jon.
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kucheria [mailto:amit.kuche...@linaro.or
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
[...]
>> cat <> "$device"
>
> s/-us/-uS/?
Ummm, yeah
Funny, sfdisk didn't report an error for that...
Cheers
---Dave
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.or
Hi,
notes and actions from our Monday graphics cross-vendor call are
available on the wiki:
+ https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2010-10-11
Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here:
+
https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics
The weekly report for the Linaro Foundations team may be found at:
Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2010-10-06
Overall status: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/Status
* Backports of the Linaro gcc packages to Ubuntu 10.04 LTS are now
available at
ht
The weekly report for the Linaro Foundations team may be found at:
Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2010-09-22
Overall status: https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/FoundationsStatus
Work continues on bugfixing for the 10.11 release, as well as some spec work
not affecting
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:34:58AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
> > I've created a wiki page at https://wiki.linaro.org/LiveHelper/Hacking
> > to describe the various steps for building your own linaro images on
> > arm hardware using live help
The weekly report for the Linaro Foundations team may be found at:
Status report: https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2010-09-29
Overall status: https://wiki.linaro.org/Releases/FoundationsStatus
* This week, Avik Sil joins us from IBM as a new assignee to the team.
Welcome, Avik!
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> >
> > This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> > I want to
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> http://rwmj.wordpress.com/2010/10/05/visualizing-reads-writes-and-alignment/
>
> This looks like pretty cool stuff. Using a patch to qemu, these tools
> generate a visualization of I/O showing the location and alignment of reads
> and writes.
>
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010, Dave Martin wrote:
> > So we can make the /boot partition look like it has 63*255 geometry,
> > and we can make it start at sector offset 63.
>
> Right; ideally, we'd offset it so that it's still on a nice boundary
> e.g. we
On 10/11/2010 01:17 PM, John Rigby wrote:
The following changes since commit d0bbdab2bb2c55c3dc6a4b3fd2128250dff99feb:
LINARO: Linaro-2.6.35-1006.12 (2010-09-20 20:01:02 -0600)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.linaro.org/ubuntu/linux-linaro.git linaro-2.6.35-1007.13
Al V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi.
As you know we've been trying to deliver an authenticated interface for
the dashboard for quite some time now without success. Recently we've
decided to add oauth support to the current XML-RPC interface we have.
James implemented a rough support
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> >
> > This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> > I want to add s
Hi Shawn,
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:20:30PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm using lp:~linaro-maintainers/linaro/live-helper.config.maverick.headless
> to build the rootfs image for imx51, and running into the following
> problems.
> - Need --force-yes apt option
> I have to get APT_OPTIONS="--yes
Thanks, Steve.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:20:30PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I'm using lp:~linaro-maintainers/linaro/live-helper.config.maverick.headless
>> to build the rootfs image for imx51, and running into the following
I'm trying to login mx51evk headless on serial console, and facing the
following problems.
- No /etc/init/ttymxc0.conf in headless rootfs
- Do not know what username and passwd to login
Should we get these addressed in headless build? We do not expect
users to do extra manual works after l-m-c,
Hi Shawn,
For "console=ttymxc0" boot option used by mx51evk, there is a bug in
/bin/auto-serial-console, which has been fixed by Alexander in
linaro.overlay.
Could you please have a try with the changes below? Normally, we don't need
to input username/passwd for headless rootfs.
line #15 of auto
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> I'm trying to login mx51evk headless on serial console, and facing the
> following problems.
>
> - No /etc/init/ttymxc0.conf in headless rootfs
> - Do not know what username and passwd to login
>
> Should we get these addressed in headless build?
That is exactly what I'm curious. Maybe I did not look at the correct
place. But I did not see it in linaro-media-create. Can someone
using beagle board please confirm?
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I'm trying to l
On 10 Oct 12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> > >
> > > This is not a patch review. But patch may
40 matches
Mail list logo
