Re: Incident Management (was: Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...))

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 11 May 2012 07:50:48 -0600, Joey STANFORD wrote: > I was hoping we could have one system for this instead of two. Are you > sure that the existing IR process can't be tweaked and used for this > purpose? Well, the main reason we now have two processes is that I wasn't aware of / had forgo

Re: Incident Management (was: Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...))

2012-05-11 Thread Joey STANFORD
I was hoping we could have one system for this instead of two. Are you sure that the existing IR process can't be tweaked and used for this purpose? On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:11:36 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle > wrote: >> On Fri, 11 May

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-11 Thread Jon Medhurst (Tixy)
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 08:15 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 10 May 2012 23:34, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > > Linaro-dev is used for development related discussion, and it's the > > first most folks first subscribe to. I don't have the curre

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-11 Thread Peter Maydell
On 10 May 2012 23:34, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > Linaro-dev is used for development related discussion, and it's the > first most folks first subscribe to. I don't have the current number > of folks participating at this list, but I'd prefer

Re: Incident Management (was: Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...))

2012-05-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 11 May 2012 12:11:36 +1200, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2012 00:30:26 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti > > > Sure, I just think there are better places for it :-) Based on issues > > > we had with LAVA and Jenkins at the

Incident Management (was: Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...))

2012-05-10 Thread Michael Hudson-Doyle
On Fri, 11 May 2012 00:30:26 +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti > > Sure, I just think there are better places for it :-) Based on issues > > we had with LAVA and Jenkins at the previous cycle, if I had one email > > for every issue, I'd send at least

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-10 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Alexander Sack wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti > wrote: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Wookey wrote: >>> +++ Christian Robottom Reis [2012-05-10 17:20 -0300]: On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >>

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-10 Thread Alexander Sack
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Wookey wrote: >> +++ Christian Robottom Reis [2012-05-10 17:20 -0300]: >>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >>> > Sorry to say that, but I hate these kind of emails at Linar

Re: pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-10 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Christian Robottom Reis [2012-05-10 17:20 -0300]: >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Ricardo Salveti wrote: >> > Sorry to say that, but I hate these kind of emails at Linaro Dev, as I >> > believe we have other places (and better ones)

pointless mail, (was Re: android-build's are failing...)

2012-05-10 Thread Wookey
+++ Christian Robottom Reis [2012-05-10 17:20 -0300]: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Ricardo Salveti wrote: > > Sorry to say that, but I hate these kind of emails at Linaro Dev, as I > > believe we have other places (and better ones) to report such issues. > > Twitter would probably be