Bumping up this discussion.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
>>> The long awaited first linux-linaro kernel package is available in the
>>> linaro-maintainers kernel ppa:
>>> pp
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 04:20:23PM +0300, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Separate source packages have the following features:
> + One flavour of the kernel is not dependent on others
Dependent in what sense? There is some risk that with everything in one
source package, a bug in a flavour-specific modu
The specific case I was wondering about was parallel builds. Is it
worth it to have multiple sources packages that are completely
identical sources with the only difference the flavours they build in
order to allow for example omap, mx51 and versatile express to all
build in parallel.
On Mon, Aug
They will go into the master branch of the Ubuntu kernel.
Cheers,
Amit
On 10 Aug 02, John Rigby wrote:
> Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
> come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Amit Kucheri
Separate source packages have the following features:
+ One flavour of the kernel is not dependent on others
+ Parallel builds (in theory, if there are build machines available)
+ Different people can upload
+ Different upload schedules
+ More useful if we are going to carry non-upstream BSPs
On the subject of adding other platforms, should we do a source
package per platform since it takes seven hours to build? I'm not
talking about omap4, that can coexist with omap3. Adding mx51 and
versatile express are issues though.
As I am thinking about this I wonder if it matters. Is there a
Ok, I see Nico is planning on getting them for his next merge so they
will go in then.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:27 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
> come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
>
> On Sat, Jul 3
Are these changes going into the Ubuntu kernel? If so then they will
come in next time I merge with it. If not I will grab your patches.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Amit Kucheria
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
>>>
> kernels. How was the OMAP config built for your packages?
>
The kernel is the merge of Ubuntu-2.6.35-12.17 and
linaro_merge_100716. The config is from the Ubuntu kernel plus make
oldconfig to deal with the new options from linaro_merge_100716.
___
l
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, Loïc Minier wrote:
> By any chance, would you have a list of enabled boards / boards
> expected to work?
I tested it on IGEPv2, and it started fine; to my surprize, it found:
mmcblk0: p1 p2
which I thought was borken with Ubuntu-ish kernels. I didn't actually
try Ubu
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
>> The long awaited first linux-linaro kernel package is available in the
>> linaro-maintainers kernel ppa:
>> ppa:linaro-maintainers/kernel
>> https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/kernel
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote:
> The long awaited first linux-linaro kernel package is available in the
> linaro-maintainers kernel ppa:
> ppa:linaro-maintainers/kernel
> https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/kernel
Awesome! So it's OMAP for now, is it OMAP3 and 4, or just
The long awaited first linux-linaro kernel package is available in the
linaro-maintainers kernel ppa:
ppa:linaro-maintainers/kernel
https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/kernel
___
linaro-dev mailing list
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
http:
13 matches
Mail list logo
