On the subject of adding other platforms, should we do a source package per platform since it takes seven hours to build? I'm not talking about omap4, that can coexist with omap3. Adding mx51 and versatile express are issues though.
As I am thinking about this I wonder if it matters. Is there a difference between one build machine taking 21 hours to build three kernels and three build machines taking seven hours? John On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:51 AM, Amit Kucheria <amit.kuche...@linaro.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Loïc Minier <loic.min...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010, John Rigby wrote: >>> The long awaited first linux-linaro kernel package is available in the >>> linaro-maintainers kernel ppa: >>> ppa:linaro-maintainers/kernel >>> https://launchpad.net/~linaro-maintainers/+archive/kernel >> >> Awesome! So it's OMAP for now, is it OMAP3 and 4, or just 3? >> >> By any chance, would you have a list of enabled boards / boards >> expected to work? > > John, > > If you're following the Ubuntu Kernel Team mailing list, you'll find > patches posted by me to enable OMAP4 (one backport + config). This > will get you OMAP3 and 4 support in the same kernel. You could also > consider enabling the i.MX51 Babbage board from mainline. Both of > these will boot up to serial console. > > Regards, > Amit > > _______________________________________________ > linaro-dev mailing list > linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev > _______________________________________________ linaro-dev mailing list linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-dev
