Hi,
The goal of the patch is to provide an easy way to find the guilty
clocks when we are optimizing the power consumption of a platform. I
agree with you that it's not enough for a complete PM and it might be
extended to other features (in addition to regulator framework). Such
debug interface sh
and the UK!Cheers, Dave
Sent from yet another ARM powered mobile device
On 17 Oct 2010, at 16:18, Sundar wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
>> BTW, 'cheers' is normally used in Australia and New Zealand. Are you from
>> there? Just curious. :)
>
> Oh really??..I am
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> BTW, 'cheers' is normally used in Australia and New Zealand. Are you from
> there? Just curious. :)
Oh really??..I am not aware of that all.I am from India :). IMO its cool.
cheers!
___
linaro-dev ma
Hi Kevin,
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> Amit Kucheria writes:
>
>> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
>>> Hi Amit and Jeremy,
>>>
>>> This is not a patch review. But patch may bet
Yes, having a interface which can also control clocks is great. I used to
write some code myself to debug clocks, so I have the same feeling with what
you said.
BTW, 'cheers' is normally used in Australia and New Zealand. Are you from
there? Just curious. :)
Yong
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM,
Believe me, it is very useful in both BSP development and SOC power
management. In the company I am working for, people are keen to have this
kind of info.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> Amit Kucheria writes:
>
> > Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might ha
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
>
[..]
>
> That being said, I'm not against $SUBJECT patch, but I question it's
> usefulness in terms of PM. What's more valuable for PM is the statitics
> and knobs exported on a per-device level by the runtime PM core (and
> AFAICT, already i
Amit Kucheria writes:
> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
>> Hi Amit and Jeremy,
>>
>> This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
>> I want to add some code in common clock
On 13 October 2010 16:14, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Vincent Guittot
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Exporting the clock tree state is help us to monitor clocks state and
>> to find the guilty clocks. But could it be also possible to have a
>> write access to the clock tree ? D
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Vincent Guittot
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Exporting the clock tree state is help us to monitor clocks state and
> to find the guilty clocks. But could it be also possible to have a
> write access to the clock tree ? During power consumption optimization
That is an interest
Hi,
Exporting the clock tree state is help us to monitor clocks state and
to find the guilty clocks. But could it be also possible to have a
write access to the clock tree ? During power consumption optimization
step, we need to identify clock/regulator which should be disable but
we also want to
Thanks for your guys' brainstorm. I will take all the thoughts into account
while implementing this.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On 10 Oct 12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > > Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation
On Wednesday 13 October 2010 08:49:42 Amit Kucheria wrote:
> That is something I've been wondering about too. At the moment, tools like
> powerdebug have to periodically re-read the entire clock tree to show
> updates. AFAIK, sysfs and debugfs don't support inotify/poll/select
> mechanisms to
> no
On 10 Oct 12, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> > Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> > >
> > > This is not a patch review. But patch may
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> >
> > This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> > I want to add s
On Tuesday 12 October 2010, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> > Hi Amit and Jeremy,
> >
> > This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> > I want to
Adding linaro-dev to cc. Kernel consolidation WG might have comments.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Yong Shen wrote:
> Hi Amit and Jeremy,
>
> This is not a patch review. But patch may better present my idea. Basically,
> I want to add some code in common clock code to export clock information
17 matches
Mail list logo